Report Summary

  • 100

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    97% of other websites

  • 93

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 82% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    56% of websites

  • 58

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    20% of websites

Page Load Speed

594 ms in total

First Response

193 ms

Resources Loaded

296 ms

Page Rendered

105 ms

track.namastelight.com screenshot

About Website

Visit track.namastelight.com now to see the best up-to-date Track Namastelight content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about track.namastelight.com

Visit track.namastelight.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Track.namastelight.com page load time and found that the first response time was 193 ms and then it took 401 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is an excellent result, as only 5% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

track.namastelight.com performance score

100

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value1.5 s

95/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value1.5 s

100/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value1.5 s

100/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value10 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.026

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value1.6 s

100/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

track.namastelight.com

193 ms

application.1.8.0.css

67 ms

jquery-1.7.2.min.js

82 ms

application.1.8.0.js

39 ms

Our browser made a total of 4 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that all of those requests were addressed to Track.namastelight.com and no external sources were called. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (193 ms) belongs to the original domain Track.namastelight.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 149.8 kB (75%)

Content Size

198.8 kB

After Optimization

49.0 kB

In fact, the total size of Track.namastelight.com main page is 198.8 kB. This result falls within a vast category (top 1 000 000) of heavyweight, probably not optimized, and thus slow loading web pages. Only a small number of websites need less resources to load. CSS take 102.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-49%

Potential reduce by 619 B

  • Original 1.3 kB
  • After minification 1.2 kB
  • After compression 632 B

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 619 B or 49% of the original size.

JavaScript Optimization

-64%

Potential reduce by 61.1 kB

  • Original 95.1 kB
  • After minification 95.0 kB
  • After compression 34.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 61.1 kB or 64% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-86%

Potential reduce by 88.1 kB

  • Original 102.5 kB
  • After minification 86.3 kB
  • After compression 14.4 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Track.namastelight.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 88.1 kB or 86% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

3

After Optimization

3

The browser has sent 3 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Track Namastelight. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Accessibility Review

track.namastelight.com accessibility score

93

Accessibility Issues

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

track.namastelight.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

track.namastelight.com SEO score

58

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Page is blocked from indexing

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Track.namastelight.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Track.namastelight.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Track Namastelight. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: