3.2 sec in total
657 ms
2.4 sec
119 ms
Visit webmail-next.names.co.uk now to see the best up-to-date Webmail Next Names content for United Kingdom and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about webmail-next.names.co.uk
Visit webmail-next.names.co.ukWe analyzed Webmail-next.names.co.uk page load time and found that the first response time was 657 ms and then it took 2.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.
webmail-next.names.co.uk performance score
657 ms
191 ms
286 ms
384 ms
479 ms
Our browser made a total of 47 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 98% of them (46 requests) were addressed to the original Webmail-next.names.co.uk, 2% (1 request) were made to Trk.names.co.uk. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (936 ms) belongs to the original domain Webmail-next.names.co.uk.
Page size can be reduced by 765.9 kB (74%)
1.0 MB
267.5 kB
In fact, the total size of Webmail-next.names.co.uk main page is 1.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 731.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 43.7 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 43.7 kB or 83% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 0 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Webmail Next Names images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 554.8 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 554.8 kB or 76% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 167.4 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Webmail-next.names.co.uk needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 167.4 kB or 82% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 29 (66%)
44
15
The browser has sent 44 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Webmail Next Names. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 14 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 17 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
webmail-next.names.co.uk
657 ms
styles.css
191 ms
styles.css
286 ms
jquery-ui-1.10.4.custom.css
384 ms
libcal.css
479 ms
calendar.css
485 ms
common.css
502 ms
outlook.css
519 ms
common_desktop.css
527 ms
rcwelcomepage.css
541 ms
rcwelcomepage_desktop.css
570 ms
0881c1d3ebab20006ac2cbb435685ddf301b14ee5c215f4ddde87a1a64a25f78b62e1d4a9d61c864
566 ms
ui.js
595 ms
common.css
610 ms
common.js
621 ms
desktop.css
636 ms
colors.js
650 ms
st_buttons_desktop.css
662 ms
st_menus_desktop.css
681 ms
ic_fa_desktop.css
702 ms
remove_list_icons.css
710 ms
skin_desktop.css
730 ms
jquery.min.js
737 ms
common.js
755 ms
app.js
870 ms
jstz.min.js
794 ms
scripts.js
803 ms
jquery-ui-1.10.4.custom.min.js
936 ms
jquery.ui.datepicker-en-GB.js
823 ms
libcalendaring.js
849 ms
calendar_base.js
884 ms
trk.js
710 ms
JLrcxvhkM17op1c4raL9Fg.woff
560 ms
JLrcxvhkM17op1c4raL9Fg.woff
567 ms
header-logo-white-nco-1.1.svg
103 ms
ajaxloader.gif
93 ms
ajaxloader_dark.gif
88 ms
buttons.png
96 ms
addcontact.png
119 ms
filetypes.png
176 ms
listicons.png
184 ms
messages.png
189 ms
messages_dark.png
215 ms
quota.png
261 ms
selector.png
275 ms
splitter.png
281 ms
watermark.jpg
312 ms
webmail-next.names.co.uk SEO score
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Webmail-next.names.co.uk can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Webmail-next.names.co.uk main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
webmail-next.names.co.uk
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Webmail Next Names. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: