Latest Accessibility News on Accessify

Gez Lemon created a nice javascript favelet to make hidden attributes of complex data tables (summary, headers, axis, scope and abbr) visible. Excellent stuff!

The Disability Discrimination Act expects companies to take reasonable steps to make their sites accessible to the disabled. The companies in Knexus Community reckon they are doing what is necessary - but they lack the guidance that would give them certainty.

…

At a Knexus forum this month, participants from member companies including American Express, Boots, Britvic Soft Drinks, BSI, ebookers, GlaxoSmithKline, Invesco, LloydsTSB, O2, Prudential, Standard Life, Telegraph Group and William Hill met to discuss web accessibility. Uncharacteristically, the forum went public with its members’ views.

Knexus chairman Graeme Foux spoke to OUT-LAW after the event. He was keen to stress that neither he nor Knexus represents the voice of these members. But he approached us to convey the tenor of their concerns.

…

One member, described as a leading provider of business services, said: "We have provided the facility so customers that visit our web site can get our information either through a telephone number or request it in an alternative source."

The unnamed member added: "I would question whether we are going over the top to ensure that everything has to be made [available] on-line."

But the Disability Rights Commission does not consider it "over the top," according to Patrick Edwards, a spokesman for the independent statutory body that monitors the effectiveness of the UK’s disability legislation.

"It’s extremely doubtful that services available on the web could possibly be translated to a telephone line without some loss in fairness to disabled people," Edwards told OUT-LAW. "Web services are available 24 hours a day and have incredibly high levels of interactivity and it is unlikely that similar type services could be duplicated on a phone line."

Edwards cited a recent High Court case which confirmed that reasonable adjustments under the Disability Discrimination Act "are not about doing the minimum" but all about doing everything reasonably practical to ensure that disabled people are treated the same as non-disabled people.

"Companies holding these views on web access are acting at considerable legal risk," concluded Edwards

Read the full article at The Register.

Andrew Kirkpatrick — project manager for NCAM projects dealing with web and rich media accessibility at the CPB/WGBH — talked about advanced accessibility challenges at the recent Web Design World 2004 conference in Boston.

When it comes to improving Web site accessibility, most designers know the basics. That’s great, but it isn’t enough. A growing number of sites employ complex forms, Web applications, dynamically updating pages, and JavaScript enhancements?and each of these elements brings its own set of accessibility challenges. In his Web Design World session, Andrew Kirkpatrick described today’s accessibility bottlenecks along with the development decisions you must make to address them, and weighed the pros and cons of automatic page transcoding tools.

Watch a video of Andrew Kirkpatrick’s session (Windows Media 9 format)

Spotted on BBC News today: Speegle, the search engine that speaks its results and bears more than a passing resemblence to Google (no way, the company protests).

I’m with Julie on this one (see the article for comment) - a one-off search engine doesn’t really help blind or partially sighted people a huge amount - as soon as they’ve moved off that page they’ll have to use another screen reader anyway.

Anyway, the site didn’t even load when I tried it. How’s that for accessible? [Update: tried again later and got the site running but it wouldn't play ball on Firefox - plug-ins required]

So, here I am sitting at a friend’s PC, riding out the down-time between my year-long travels and Christmas/returning to work. A bit of casual browsing later reveals a little gem that just begged to be posted here …

Over at Standards-Schmandards (love the name!) is an interesting project by the name of Fangs that deserves a look. The author of this tool has created an extension for Firefox that aims to mimic the output that would be generated (audibly) by screen readers such as Jaws. Given how pricey a full copy of Jaws is, this looks like a promising option for the developer who cares about standards/accessibility but does not need to use a screen reader a huge amount (and hence justify paying for it). In addition, unlike Jaws, this is cross-platform - if you have Firefox 1.0, this *should* work. The ’should’ part needs emphasising because the extension is still in development. However, the author is definitely after feedback and is also sharing the source code. Give it a try and see if you can help out.

Try the archives on the site for more Fangs news.

As previously mentioned by Patrick the W3C WCAG Working Group is requesting your feedback on the latest Working Draft of the Web Content Accessibility Guidelines. This is your (soon to be last) opportunity to have your input into the next version of these important guidelines. Once this document reaches Candidate Recommendation (hopefully early in 2005) your comments will be much more difficult for the W3C to make use of, if at all.

An introduction (which feedback is requested for too) is available at:

http://www.w3.org/WAI/intro/wcag20

The five Working Drafts published on the 19^th of November can be found at:

• Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 2.0
• General Techniques for WCAG 2.0
• HTML Techniques for WCAG 2.0
• CSS Techniques for WCAG 2.0
• Client-side Scripting Techniques for WCAG 2.0

And once you’ve read some of that lot (comments on the techniques documents are especially needed) send your comments to public-comments-wcag20@w3.org. 200 public comments were incorporated into the 19^th of November Working Drafts, get your comments incorporated in the next and leave your mark on this important step for Web Acccessibility.

Distinctly higher quality than in 2003

Economics Minister Clement: Accessibility has a considerable innovation and growth potential

Aktion Mensch and Stiftung Digitale Chancen honoured the best German accessible Websites with the BIENE Award in Berlin last night. Golden BIENEs were awarded to the Postbank and the Integrationsfachdienst Profil Hamburg. All in all 19 websites were honoured for their exceptional accessibility. Federal Economics Minister Wolfgang Clement emphasized in his welcoming address that every Internet application has to follow accessibility standards. Herein lies a considerable innovation and growth potential for a digital Germany.

Read the full press release for the BIENE Awards 2004.

There are still some places available for the Ninth CETIS-TechDis Accessibility Special Interest Group (SIG) Meeting, which will be hosted by BECTA in Coventry on Thursday 9th December from 10.30 to approximately 16:00. There is no charge for attending the meeting and lunch will be provided.

The agenda will include:

An Introduction to the IMS Accessibility Guidelines ? Sharon Perry, CETIS.

A brief overview of the IMS Accessibility Guidelines.

NLN Materials Project ? Andy Dudfield, BECTA.

An overview of the NLN Materials Project

Accessibility and BECTA - Adrian Higginbotham, BECTA.

An introduction to BECTA’s wider reaching accessibility work.

Is “Good Enough”, Good Enough? Creating an Authoring Tool with Built-in Accessibility Support - David Kraithman, University of Hertfordshire.

The SMIRK program developed at the University of Hertfordshire will be demonstrated and related to standards and specifications on accessibility. SMIRK is a tool for capturing, producing and then sending audio-visual presentations over the internet.

Discussion.

Time for discussion about relevant issues.

If you would like to attend, please complete the registration form.

The Frauenhofer Institute of Technology has recently released a version of the Web Sites That Work video dubbed in German. Available as MPEG, Quicktime and — which is the part that particularly piqued my interest — Quicktime SMIL. The original english version is, of course, also available.

A new Working Draft of the Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 2.0 (WCAG 2.0) as well as four supporting documents were published 19 November 2004. The Web Content Accessibility Guidelines Working Group (WCAG WG) invites you to comment on these documents. W3C Working Drafts provide opportunities for public comment during the development of a specification. Please send comments to the public comments mailing list by 3 January 2005: public-comments-wcag20@w3.org

WCAG 2.0 addresses accessibility of Web content for people with disabilities. It will apply to a wider range of Web technologies than WCAG 1.0 and is intended to be understandable to a wider audience.

See Judy Brewer’s full call for review for further details.