3.6 sec in total
43 ms
3.2 sec
360 ms
Visit blog.osbornewood.com now to see the best up-to-date Blog Osborne Wood content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about blog.osbornewood.com
Committed to a partnership for success since 1979
Visit blog.osbornewood.comWe analyzed Blog.osbornewood.com page load time and found that the first response time was 43 ms and then it took 3.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.
blog.osbornewood.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.1 s
47/100
10%
Value9.2 s
1/100
25%
Value7.7 s
24/100
10%
Value610 ms
49/100
30%
Value0.095
91/100
15%
Value11.2 s
20/100
10%
43 ms
937 ms
112 ms
78 ms
64 ms
Our browser made a total of 45 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 53% of them (24 requests) were addressed to the original Blog.osbornewood.com, 22% (10 requests) were made to Fonts.wp.com and 4% (2 requests) were made to Fonts-api.wp.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.9 sec) belongs to the original domain Blog.osbornewood.com.
Page size can be reduced by 383.1 kB (7%)
5.2 MB
4.9 MB
In fact, the total size of Blog.osbornewood.com main page is 5.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 4.9 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 66.6 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 66.6 kB or 78% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 315.2 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Blog Osborne Wood images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 922 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 393 B
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Blog.osbornewood.com has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 18 (64%)
28
10
The browser has sent 28 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Blog Osborne Wood. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 15 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
blog.osbornewood.com
43 ms
blog.osbornewood.com
937 ms
112 ms
dashicons.min.css
78 ms
css2
64 ms
css
55 ms
jquery.min.js
74 ms
80 ms
js
229 ms
bilmur.min.js
39 ms
ivory-search.css
100 ms
106 ms
sticky-sidebar.min.js
229 ms
script.min.js
231 ms
scripts.js
310 ms
general.min.js
309 ms
e-202410.js
39 ms
308 ms
frontend.min.js
400 ms
lhn-owp-jssdk-current.min.js
220 ms
ga.js
218 ms
cropped-logo-transparent.png
240 ms
cropped-Blog-Header-February-23.png
518 ms
Blog-Hero-Image_Bayne-Custom-WW-4084.png
1550 ms
Blog-Hero-Image_2442-CDC-Woodworking.png
1850 ms
Blog-Hero-Image_Ashmore_2452.png
254 ms
Floating-Shelf-Guide-1200-x-657-px.png
673 ms
Blog-Hero-Image-Builders-Cabinet-2749.png
239 ms
neIQzD-0qpwxpaWvjeD0X88SAOeaiXM.ttf
93 ms
neIXzD-0qpwxpaWvjeD0X88SAOeasasahSs.ttf
109 ms
vEFI2_5QCwIS4_Dhez5jcWjVamgc.ttf
87 ms
vEFV2_5QCwIS4_Dhez5jcVBp.ttf
93 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf
95 ms
KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf
95 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fBBc9.ttf
95 ms
KFOkCnqEu92Fr1MmgVxIIzc.ttf
108 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfBBc9.ttf
107 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtfBBc9.ttf
109 ms
fa-brands-400.woff
274 ms
fa-solid-900.woff
190 ms
fa-regular-400.woff
259 ms
__utm.gif
24 ms
collect
40 ms
ga-audiences
54 ms
lhn-jquery-1.11.0.min.js
87 ms
blog.osbornewood.com accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
blog.osbornewood.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
blog.osbornewood.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Blog.osbornewood.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Blog.osbornewood.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
blog.osbornewood.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Blog Osborne Wood. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: