Report Summary

  • 100

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    97% of other websites

  • 93

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 82% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    36% of websites

  • 67

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    25% of websites

Page Load Speed

2.8 sec in total

First Response

162 ms

Resources Loaded

2.5 sec

Page Rendered

131 ms

cme.oxfordjournals.org screenshot

About Website

Welcome to cme.oxfordjournals.org homepage info - get ready to check Cme Oxfordjournals best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about cme.oxfordjournals.org

OeL - Helping you to fulfil your professional development - www.oxforde-learning.com<http://www.oxforde-learning.com>

Visit cme.oxfordjournals.org

Key Findings

We analyzed Cme.oxfordjournals.org page load time and found that the first response time was 162 ms and then it took 2.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

cme.oxfordjournals.org performance score

100

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value0.6 s

100/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value0.6 s

100/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value0.6 s

100/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value0 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value0.6 s

100/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

cme.oxfordjournals.org

162 ms

1394 ms

core.css

341 ms

module.css

174 ms

modernizr.js

260 ms

Our browser made a total of 24 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 4% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Cme.oxfordjournals.org, 50% (12 requests) were made to Oxforde-learning.com and 21% (5 requests) were made to W.sharethis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.4 sec) relates to the external source Oxforde-learning.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 123.7 kB (56%)

Content Size

220.6 kB

After Optimization

96.9 kB

In fact, the total size of Cme.oxfordjournals.org main page is 220.6 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 25% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 203.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-72%

Potential reduce by 8.5 kB

  • Original 11.7 kB
  • After minification 10.6 kB
  • After compression 3.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 8.5 kB or 72% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-4%

Potential reduce by 224 B

  • Original 5.9 kB
  • After minification 5.6 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Cme Oxfordjournals images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-57%

Potential reduce by 115.0 kB

  • Original 203.0 kB
  • After minification 202.9 kB
  • After compression 87.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 115.0 kB or 57% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 8 (36%)

Requests Now

22

After Optimization

14

The browser has sent 22 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Cme Oxfordjournals. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 9 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

cme.oxfordjournals.org accessibility score

93

Accessibility Issues

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Best Practices

cme.oxfordjournals.org best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

SEO Factors

cme.oxfordjournals.org SEO score

67

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Cme.oxfordjournals.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Cme.oxfordjournals.org main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Cme Oxfordjournals. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: