Report Summary

  • 14

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    26% of other websites

  • 91

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 77% of websites

  • 0

    Best Practices

  • 85

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    56% of websites

Page Load Speed

4.1 sec in total

First Response

1.4 sec

Resources Loaded

2.4 sec

Page Rendered

431 ms

cybersecurity.oxfordjournals.org screenshot

About Website

Visit cybersecurity.oxfordjournals.org now to see the best up-to-date Cybersecurity Oxfordjournals content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about cybersecurity.oxfordjournals.org

Visit cybersecurity.oxfordjournals.org

Key Findings

We analyzed Cybersecurity.oxfordjournals.org page load time and found that the first response time was 1.4 sec and then it took 2.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

cybersecurity.oxfordjournals.org performance score

14

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.7 s

62/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value11.4 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value6.6 s

37/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value3,330 ms

2/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.472

18/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value13.6 s

11/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

cybersecurity.oxfordjournals.org

1356 ms

css_sjWB4vH-lEfnTxZczCUiLo6oA82DxNlqffbG1NXFGN8.css

120 ms

css_0tl77SZBCeFUnhp5204AGbvTdRDlQsZY10IdCA60RJU.css

135 ms

css_LAv6GPvJS7_BmayT4gPMuTWYfNk-lba7-YZlLHNHmL8.css

138 ms

css_akOPK2us0pE2W2wmoLtrpEz0VpSj-8IpIcV-gCfvoHY.css

134 ms

Our browser made a total of 77 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 13% of them (10 requests) were addressed to the original Cybersecurity.oxfordjournals.org, 66% (51 requests) were made to Dle0zb5r5znmr.cloudfront.net and 3% (2 requests) were made to Gab.cookie.oup.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.4 sec) belongs to the original domain Cybersecurity.oxfordjournals.org.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 822.6 kB (71%)

Content Size

1.2 MB

After Optimization

333.8 kB

In fact, the total size of Cybersecurity.oxfordjournals.org main page is 1.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 606.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-81%

Potential reduce by 80.2 kB

  • Original 99.0 kB
  • After minification 95.8 kB
  • After compression 18.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 80.2 kB or 81% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-9%

Potential reduce by 11.8 kB

  • Original 133.4 kB
  • After minification 121.5 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Cybersecurity Oxfordjournals images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-76%

Potential reduce by 460.0 kB

  • Original 606.4 kB
  • After minification 523.2 kB
  • After compression 146.5 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 460.0 kB or 76% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-85%

Potential reduce by 270.5 kB

  • Original 317.6 kB
  • After minification 309.8 kB
  • After compression 47.1 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Cybersecurity.oxfordjournals.org needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 270.5 kB or 85% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 43 (57%)

Requests Now

76

After Optimization

33

The browser has sent 76 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Cybersecurity Oxfordjournals. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 24 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 11 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

cybersecurity.oxfordjournals.org accessibility score

91

Accessibility Issues

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

SEO Factors

cybersecurity.oxfordjournals.org SEO score

85

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Cybersecurity.oxfordjournals.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Cybersecurity.oxfordjournals.org main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Cybersecurity Oxfordjournals. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: