Report Summary

  • 93

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    92% of other websites

  • 100

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 97% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    81% of websites

  • 91

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    71% of websites

john.onolan.org

John O'Nolan

Page Load Speed

3.3 sec in total

First Response

349 ms

Resources Loaded

2.5 sec

Page Rendered

391 ms

john.onolan.org screenshot

About Website

Visit john.onolan.org now to see the best up-to-date John O Nolan content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about john.onolan.org

Founder @ Ghost.org – I write about startup life, open source, journalism and remote work. I also travel a lot and collect tattoos.

Visit john.onolan.org

Key Findings

We analyzed John.onolan.org page load time and found that the first response time was 349 ms and then it took 2.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

john.onolan.org performance score

93

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.6 s

63/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value2.6 s

87/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value2.6 s

97/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value0 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value2.6 s

98/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

john.onolan.org

349 ms

eston-layout.min.css

30 ms

eston-skin-default.min.css

27 ms

jquery-1.11.3.min.js

50 ms

snapwidget.js

348 ms

Our browser made a total of 54 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 15% of them (8 requests) were addressed to the original John.onolan.org, 11% (6 requests) were made to Scontent.cdninstagram.com and 9% (5 requests) were made to Snapwidget.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1 sec) relates to the external source Scontent.cdninstagram.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 187.7 kB (21%)

Content Size

915.3 kB

After Optimization

727.5 kB

In fact, the total size of John.onolan.org main page is 915.3 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 627.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-77%

Potential reduce by 26.4 kB

  • Original 34.2 kB
  • After minification 32.0 kB
  • After compression 7.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 26.4 kB or 77% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 3.6 kB

  • Original 627.7 kB
  • After minification 624.1 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. John O Nolan images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-54%

Potential reduce by 92.1 kB

  • Original 171.9 kB
  • After minification 171.9 kB
  • After compression 79.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 92.1 kB or 54% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-80%

Potential reduce by 65.6 kB

  • Original 81.5 kB
  • After minification 78.5 kB
  • After compression 15.9 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. John.onolan.org needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 65.6 kB or 80% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 28 (57%)

Requests Now

49

After Optimization

21

The browser has sent 49 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of John O Nolan. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 18 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

john.onolan.org accessibility score

100

Accessibility Issues

Best Practices

john.onolan.org best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

SEO Factors

john.onolan.org SEO score

91

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise John.onolan.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that John.onolan.org main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of John O Nolan. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: