Tools & Wizards About Us
journal.oraltradition.org screenshot

Report Summary

  • 21

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    39% of other websites

  • 77

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 45% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 86

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    60% of websites

journal.oraltradition.org

Oral Tradition Journal at Harvard University

Page Load Speed

1.6 sec in total

First Response

279 ms

Resources Loaded

997 ms

Page Rendered

353 ms

journal.oraltradition.org screenshot

About Website

Welcome to journal.oraltradition.org homepage info - get ready to check Journal Oral Tradition best content for Philippines right away, or after learning these important things about journal.oraltradition.org

An open-access journal devoted to the study of the world’s oral traditions, past and present.

Visit journal.oraltradition.org

Key Findings

We analyzed Journal.oraltradition.org page load time and found that the first response time was 279 ms and then it took 1.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 25% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

journal.oraltradition.org performance score

21

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.5 s

15/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value20.4 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value11.3 s

5/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,550 ms

13/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value17.5 s

4/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

journal.oraltradition.org

279 ms

style.css

110 ms

jd.gallery.css

179 ms

layout.css

146 ms

mediabox.css

182 ms

Our browser made a total of 26 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 73% of them (19 requests) were addressed to the original Journal.oraltradition.org, 12% (3 requests) were made to Jc.revolvermaps.com and 8% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (364 ms) belongs to the original domain Journal.oraltradition.org.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 94.4 kB (46%)

Content Size

203.5 kB

After Optimization

109.1 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Journal.oraltradition.org main page is 203.5 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only 10% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 78.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 32.2 kB

  • Original 38.8 kB
  • After minification 30.9 kB
  • After compression 6.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 7.9 kB, which is 20% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 32.2 kB or 83% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-5%

Potential reduce by 4.0 kB

  • Original 78.0 kB
  • After minification 74.0 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Journal Oral Tradition images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-64%

Potential reduce by 43.6 kB

  • Original 68.1 kB
  • After minification 61.5 kB
  • After compression 24.5 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 43.6 kB or 64% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-78%

Potential reduce by 14.5 kB

  • Original 18.6 kB
  • After minification 15.4 kB
  • After compression 4.0 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Journal.oraltradition.org needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 14.5 kB or 78% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 14 (56%)

Requests Now

25

After Optimization

11

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 25 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Journal Oral Tradition. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 5 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

journal.oraltradition.org

journal.oraltradition.org

279 ms

style.css

style.css

110 ms

jd.gallery.css

jd.gallery.css

179 ms

layout.css

layout.css

146 ms

mediabox.css

mediabox.css

182 ms

AC_QuickTime.js

AC_QuickTime.js

252 ms

pngfix.js

pngfix.js

218 ms

1.js

1.js

201 ms

clear-children.js

clear-children.js

179 ms

headerbg.jpg

headerbg.jpg

75 ms

logo_small_new2.png

logo_small_new2.png

181 ms

OT_Founding_Editor.png

OT_Founding_Editor.png

182 ms

contentbg.gif

contentbg.gif

255 ms

eCompanion.png

eCompanion.png

254 ms

no_eCompanion.gif

no_eCompanion.gif

218 ms

eCompanion_small.png

eCompanion_small.png

292 ms

contentbottombg.gif

contentbottombg.gif

291 ms

contentbottomleftbg.gif

contentbottomleftbg.gif

330 ms

contentbottomrightbg.gif

contentbottomrightbg.gif

329 ms

chinese_version.png

chinese_version.png

364 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

5 ms

collect

collect

11 ms

c.php

c.php

100 ms

r.php

r.php

199 ms

f.php

f.php

209 ms

0.jpg

0.jpg

201 ms

Accessibility Review

journal.oraltradition.org accessibility score

77

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best Practices

journal.oraltradition.org best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

High

Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools

SEO Factors

journal.oraltradition.org SEO score

86

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document doesn't use legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Journal.oraltradition.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Journal.oraltradition.org main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

journal.oraltradition.org

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Journal Oral Tradition. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: