Tools & Wizards About Us
oceanconservation.org screenshot

Report Summary

  • 17

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    32% of other websites

  • 55

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 23% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 86

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    60% of websites

oceanconservation.org

Ocean Conservation Society: Help Protect Our Oceans Today

Page Load Speed

2 sec in total

First Response

113 ms

Resources Loaded

1.3 sec

Page Rendered

554 ms

oceanconservation.org screenshot

About Website

Visit oceanconservation.org now to see the best up-to-date Ocean Conservation content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about oceanconservation.org

Learn about OCS’ 25 years of whale and dolphin research and educational programs that support and promote ocean conservation. Explore ways to get involved!

Visit oceanconservation.org

Key Findings

We analyzed Oceanconservation.org page load time and found that the first response time was 113 ms and then it took 1.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

oceanconservation.org performance score

17

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.1 s

45/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value8.7 s

1/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value10.2 s

8/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value890 ms

32/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.678

8/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value18.3 s

3/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

oceanconservation.org

113 ms

www.oceanconservation.org

233 ms

67nuo.css

121 ms

css

34 ms

67nuo.js

167 ms

Our browser made a total of 65 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 54% of them (35 requests) were addressed to the original Oceanconservation.org, 23% (15 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 14% (9 requests) were made to Youtube.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (453 ms) belongs to the original domain Oceanconservation.org.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 277.4 kB (16%)

Content Size

1.7 MB

After Optimization

1.4 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Oceanconservation.org main page is 1.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 1.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 51.7 kB

  • Original 61.7 kB
  • After minification 57.4 kB
  • After compression 10.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 51.7 kB or 84% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-20%

Potential reduce by 222.8 kB

  • Original 1.1 MB
  • After minification 874.9 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Ocean Conservation needs image optimization as it can save up to 222.8 kB or 20% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 2.7 kB

  • Original 340.8 kB
  • After minification 340.8 kB
  • After compression 338.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 178 B

  • Original 194.0 kB
  • After minification 194.0 kB
  • After compression 193.8 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Oceanconservation.org has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 12 (38%)

Requests Now

32

After Optimization

20

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 32 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Ocean Conservation. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 10 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

oceanconservation.org

oceanconservation.org

113 ms

www.oceanconservation.org

www.oceanconservation.org

233 ms

67nuo.css

67nuo.css

121 ms

css

css

34 ms

67nuo.js

67nuo.js

167 ms

240ri.css

240ri.css

184 ms

custom.unified.js

custom.unified.js

361 ms

common.js

common.js

161 ms

wp-embed.min.js

wp-embed.min.js

164 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

63 ms

ocean-conservation-society-logo.gif

ocean-conservation-society-logo.gif

59 ms

oQpHuSYE7_E

oQpHuSYE7_E

274 ms

8467799

8467799

72 ms

OCS-bottlenose-dolphins.jpg

OCS-bottlenose-dolphins.jpg

269 ms

OCS-icon-observation-grey.png

OCS-icon-observation-grey.png

69 ms

OCS-icon-support-1.png

OCS-icon-support-1.png

266 ms

OCS-icons-learn-more.png

OCS-icons-learn-more.png

266 ms

humpback-whale-and-calf-OCS.jpg

humpback-whale-and-calf-OCS.jpg

267 ms

OCS-icons-take-action.png

OCS-icons-take-action.png

268 ms

Carl-Safina-Ocean-Conservation-Society.png

Carl-Safina-Ocean-Conservation-Society.png

268 ms

OCS-icon-observation-grey.png

OCS-icon-observation-grey.png

266 ms

OCS-marine-mammal-research-survey.jpg

OCS-marine-mammal-research-survey.jpg

271 ms

OCS-icon-support-2.png

OCS-icon-support-2.png

272 ms

OCS-shop-apparel-bonfire.jpg

OCS-shop-apparel-bonfire.jpg

272 ms

water3.jpg

water3.jpg

264 ms

water4.jpg

water4.jpg

264 ms

ocean-conservation-society-logo.gif

ocean-conservation-society-logo.gif

213 ms

OCS-icons-learn-more.png

OCS-icons-learn-more.png

78 ms

OCS-icon-support-1.png

OCS-icon-support-1.png

77 ms

humpback-whale-and-calf-OCS.jpg

humpback-whale-and-calf-OCS.jpg

360 ms

OCS-icon-observation-grey.png

OCS-icon-observation-grey.png

76 ms

OCS-icons-take-action.png

OCS-icons-take-action.png

76 ms

Carl-Safina-Ocean-Conservation-Society.png

Carl-Safina-Ocean-Conservation-Society.png

357 ms

www-player.css

www-player.css

36 ms

www-embed-player.js

www-embed-player.js

34 ms

base.js

base.js

35 ms

OCS-marine-mammal-research-survey.jpg

OCS-marine-mammal-research-survey.jpg

162 ms

OCS-shop-apparel-bonfire.jpg

OCS-shop-apparel-bonfire.jpg

213 ms

OCS-icon-support-2.png

OCS-icon-support-2.png

160 ms

water3.jpg

water3.jpg

211 ms

water4.jpg

water4.jpg

453 ms

WwkQxPq1DFK04uqseVo.ttf

WwkQxPq1DFK04uqseVo.ttf

83 ms

WwkdxPq1DFK04uJ9XUrNEIA.ttf

WwkdxPq1DFK04uJ9XUrNEIA.ttf

102 ms

WwkdxPq1DFK04uIZXErNEIA.ttf

WwkdxPq1DFK04uIZXErNEIA.ttf

122 ms

modules.ttf

modules.ttf

219 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCuM73w3aX8.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCuM73w3aX8.ttf

122 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvr73w3aX8.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvr73w3aX8.ttf

121 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvC73w3aX8.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvC73w3aX8.ttf

123 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCu173w3aX8.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCu173w3aX8.ttf

121 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtZ6Hw3aX8.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtZ6Hw3aX8.ttf

121 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Hw3aX8.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Hw3aX8.ttf

124 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCs16Hw3aX8.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCs16Hw3aX8.ttf

123 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvr6Hw3aX8.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvr6Hw3aX8.ttf

123 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Xw3aX8.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Xw3aX8.ttf

123 ms

PbytFmztEwbIocezzqM.ttf

PbytFmztEwbIocezzqM.ttf

124 ms

oQpHuSYE7_E

oQpHuSYE7_E

131 ms

www-player.css

www-player.css

10 ms

www-embed-player.js

www-embed-player.js

27 ms

base.js

base.js

59 ms

ad_status.js

ad_status.js

146 ms

UCY5Klx_0fJhMytIltuKLUwnjJON9GWedkq6jjIrpW0.js

UCY5Klx_0fJhMytIltuKLUwnjJON9GWedkq6jjIrpW0.js

110 ms

embed.js

embed.js

37 ms

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf

25 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf

24 ms

id

id

28 ms

Accessibility Review

oceanconservation.org accessibility score

55

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

oceanconservation.org best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

oceanconservation.org SEO score

86

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Oceanconservation.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Oceanconservation.org main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

oceanconservation.org

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Ocean Conservation. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: