16 sec in total
1.3 sec
14.5 sec
234 ms
Click here to check amazing Ofactor content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about ofactor.in
Best Creative ad agency in Delhi NCR. Ofactor is a creative digital marketing agency near you. Ofactor is best advertising agency in Gurgaon
Visit ofactor.inWe analyzed Ofactor.in page load time and found that the first response time was 1.3 sec and then it took 14.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 90% of websites can load faster.
ofactor.in performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value6.9 s
1/100
10%
Value40.0 s
0/100
25%
Value25.1 s
0/100
10%
Value1,870 ms
9/100
30%
Value0.042
99/100
15%
Value29.3 s
0/100
10%
1268 ms
252 ms
503 ms
705 ms
726 ms
Our browser made a total of 86 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 76% of them (65 requests) were addressed to the original Ofactor.in, 10% (9 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 9% (8 requests) were made to Ofactor.co.in. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (3.1 sec) relates to the external source Ofactor.co.in.
Page size can be reduced by 133.0 kB (2%)
6.6 MB
6.4 MB
In fact, the total size of Ofactor.in main page is 6.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 5.9 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 118.0 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 118.0 kB or 85% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 1.0 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Ofactor images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 3.0 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 11.1 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Ofactor.in has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 66 (90%)
73
7
The browser has sent 73 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Ofactor. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 22 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 37 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
ofactor.in
1268 ms
frontend.css
252 ms
rs6.css
503 ms
header-footer-elementor.css
705 ms
elementor-icons.min.css
726 ms
frontend.min.css
728 ms
swiper.min.css
753 ms
e-swiper.min.css
755 ms
post-5.css
912 ms
global.css
940 ms
post-59.css
968 ms
post-157.css
969 ms
post-156.css
1004 ms
style.css
1006 ms
style-864.css
1217 ms
forminator-icons.min.css
1175 ms
forminator-utilities.min.css
1210 ms
forminator-grid.open.min.css
1211 ms
forminator-form-material.base.min.css
1255 ms
forminator-form-material.select2.min.css
1259 ms
forminator-form-material.full.min.css
1411 ms
intlTelInput.min.css
1453 ms
buttons.min.css
1453 ms
pum-site-styles.css
1520 ms
general.min.css
1506 ms
css
32 ms
fontawesome.min.css
1507 ms
solid.min.css
1646 ms
regular.min.css
1693 ms
brands.min.css
1695 ms
jquery.min.js
2008 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
1758 ms
revolution.tools.min.js
2430 ms
rs6.min.js
2350 ms
select2.full.min.js
2177 ms
jquery.validate.min.js
1937 ms
forminator-form.min.js
2017 ms
js
57 ms
css
31 ms
widget-image.min.css
2176 ms
widget-spacer.min.css
2011 ms
widget-heading.min.css
1759 ms
widget-social-icons.min.css
1719 ms
apple-webkit.min.css
1702 ms
front.multi.min.js
1786 ms
intlTelInput.min.js
1764 ms
libphonenumber.min.js
1835 ms
primary-navigation.js
1752 ms
responsive-embeds.js
1732 ms
core.min.js
1775 ms
pum-site-scripts.js
1798 ms
general.min.js
1763 ms
frontend.js
1814 ms
elfsight-form-builder.js
1976 ms
webpack.runtime.min.js
1702 ms
frontend-modules.min.js
1835 ms
frontend.min.js
1800 ms
css
18 ms
About-Us-Gif.gif
3019 ms
LOGO20400X400.png
414 ms
LOGO20400X400-pi894d6w24xtqe2ntao2mayq30vn28lntnmdg0ssxm.png
455 ms
transparent.png
551 ms
Hompage-Ofactor-1-1.jpg
1921 ms
eye-gif.gif
2289 ms
1-1.jpg
2781 ms
umbrella.gif
2321 ms
2-1.jpg
2929 ms
plus-min.gif
2379 ms
3-1.jpg
3046 ms
light-1-min.gif
3088 ms
Banner_about_Footer.jpg
1595 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCuM73w5aXw.woff
23 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvr73w5aXw.woff
27 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvC73w5aXw.woff
36 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCu173w5aXw.woff
42 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtZ6Hw5aXw.woff
42 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Hw5aXw.woff
54 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCs16Hw5aXw.woff
42 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvr6Hw5aXw.woff
53 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Xw5aXw.woff
42 ms
fa-solid-900.woff
948 ms
fa-regular-400.woff
590 ms
fa-brands-400.woff
929 ms
polyfills.js
673 ms
admin-ajax.php
1363 ms
print.css
253 ms
ofactor.in accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles
[aria-hidden="true"] elements contain focusable descendents
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
ofactor.in best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
ofactor.in SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document doesn't use legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Ofactor.in can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Ofactor.in main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
ofactor.in
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Ofactor. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: