Tools & Wizards About Us
ohsodelightful.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 23

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    41% of other websites

  • 95

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 86% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 91

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    70% of websites

ohsodelightful.com

Oh So Delightful - your friendly vintage resource - Oh So Delightful

Page Load Speed

5 sec in total

First Response

140 ms

Resources Loaded

4.2 sec

Page Rendered

617 ms

ohsodelightful.com screenshot

About Website

Visit ohsodelightful.com now to see the best up-to-date Oh So Delightful content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about ohsodelightful.com

If you love the look of vintage fashion and don't know where to start, look no further than Oh So Delightful, helping you be the pinup girl of your dreams!

Visit ohsodelightful.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Ohsodelightful.com page load time and found that the first response time was 140 ms and then it took 4.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

ohsodelightful.com performance score

23

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.7 s

29/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value5.8 s

15/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value8.0 s

22/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value2,800 ms

3/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.119

85/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value14.3 s

9/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

ohsodelightful.com

140 ms

www.ohsodelightful.com

342 ms

style.min.css

80 ms

mediaelementplayer-legacy.min.css

95 ms

wp-mediaelement.min.css

90 ms

Our browser made a total of 72 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 32% of them (23 requests) were addressed to the original Ohsodelightful.com, 25% (18 requests) were made to I0.wp.com and 13% (9 requests) were made to C0.wp.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (510 ms) relates to the external source Googleads.g.doubleclick.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 73.0 kB (2%)

Content Size

4.0 MB

After Optimization

4.0 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Ohsodelightful.com main page is 4.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 3.5 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-77%

Potential reduce by 69.8 kB

  • Original 90.4 kB
  • After minification 90.3 kB
  • After compression 20.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 69.8 kB or 77% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 809 B

  • Original 3.5 MB
  • After minification 3.5 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Oh So Delightful images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 1.6 kB

  • Original 418.2 kB
  • After minification 418.1 kB
  • After compression 416.5 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 721 B

  • Original 53.0 kB
  • After minification 53.0 kB
  • After compression 52.2 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Ohsodelightful.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 36 (60%)

Requests Now

60

After Optimization

24

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 60 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Oh So Delightful. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 26 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 12 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

ohsodelightful.com

ohsodelightful.com

140 ms

www.ohsodelightful.com

www.ohsodelightful.com

342 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

80 ms

mediaelementplayer-legacy.min.css

mediaelementplayer-legacy.min.css

95 ms

wp-mediaelement.min.css

wp-mediaelement.min.css

90 ms

wordpress-svg-icon-plugin-style.min.css

wordpress-svg-icon-plugin-style.min.css

62 ms

cookieNSCconsent.min.css

cookieNSCconsent.min.css

86 ms

fontfaces.css

fontfaces.css

89 ms

css

css

95 ms

style.css

style.css

81 ms

styles_thumbnails.css

styles_thumbnails.css

84 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

90 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

90 ms

buy-me-a-coffee-public.js

buy-me-a-coffee-public.js

287 ms

js

js

145 ms

widget.prod.min.js

widget.prod.min.js

110 ms

js

js

200 ms

adsbygoogle.js

adsbygoogle.js

117 ms

adsbygoogle.js

adsbygoogle.js

160 ms

flexslider.css

flexslider.css

89 ms

public.css

public.css

105 ms

related.css

related.css

104 ms

cookieNSCconsent.min.js

cookieNSCconsent.min.js

274 ms

googlesitekit-consent-mode-3d6495dceaebc28bcca3.js

googlesitekit-consent-mode-3d6495dceaebc28bcca3.js

416 ms

e-202440.js

e-202440.js

104 ms

wp-consent-api.min.js

wp-consent-api.min.js

461 ms

jquery.flexslider.min.js

jquery.flexslider.min.js

461 ms

script.min.js

script.min.js

461 ms

jQuery.easing.min.js

jQuery.easing.min.js

508 ms

frontend.js

frontend.js

503 ms

imagesloaded.min.js

imagesloaded.min.js

86 ms

masonry.min.js

masonry.min.js

102 ms

jquery.masonry.min.js

jquery.masonry.min.js

104 ms

comment-reply.min.js

comment-reply.min.js

104 ms

vcd15cbe7772f49c399c6a5babf22c1241717689176015

vcd15cbe7772f49c399c6a5babf22c1241717689176015

105 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

196 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

185 ms

hotjar-2307670.js

hotjar-2307670.js

315 ms

cropped-1.png

cropped-1.png

226 ms

IMG_1733.png

IMG_1733.png

328 ms

1960s-lingerie-3-1.png

1960s-lingerie-3-1.png

327 ms

1960s-lingerie-4-1.png

1960s-lingerie-4-1.png

329 ms

1960s-lingerie-1.png

1960s-lingerie-1.png

331 ms

clothing-and-accessories.png

clothing-and-accessories.png

368 ms

make-up-and-hair.png

make-up-and-hair.png

292 ms

img_1600-1.png

img_1600-1.png

330 ms

style-inspiration-1.png

style-inspiration-1.png

331 ms

image.jpg

image.jpg

367 ms

img_1764-1.png

img_1764-1.png

333 ms

img_1852-1.png

img_1852-1.png

333 ms

img_1768-1.png

img_1768-1.png

334 ms

what-they-wore-1940s-autumn-1.png

what-they-wore-1940s-autumn-1.png

334 ms

style-inspiration-1.png

style-inspiration-1.png

335 ms

default.png

default.png

334 ms

dressing-vinatge.jpg

dressing-vinatge.jpg

334 ms

Dior.jpg

Dior.jpg

365 ms

show_ads_impl.js

show_ads_impl.js

169 ms

socials.woff

socials.woff

46 ms

z7NFdQDnbTkabZAIOl9il_O6KJj73e7Ff1GhDuXMQg.ttf

z7NFdQDnbTkabZAIOl9il_O6KJj73e7Ff1GhDuXMQg.ttf

175 ms

blocks.woff

blocks.woff

238 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4gaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4gaVc.ttf

189 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVc.ttf

214 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjr0B4gaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjr0B4gaVc.ttf

220 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4gaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4gaVc.ttf

220 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4gaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4gaVc.ttf

219 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgshZ1x4gaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgshZ1x4gaVc.ttf

220 ms

elusive.woff

elusive.woff

44 ms

collect

collect

109 ms

bg_direction_nav.png

bg_direction_nav.png

80 ms

zrt_lookup.html

zrt_lookup.html

71 ms

ads

ads

510 ms

main.js

main.js

53 ms

Accessibility Review

ohsodelightful.com accessibility score

95

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

ohsodelightful.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

ohsodelightful.com SEO score

91

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Ohsodelightful.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Ohsodelightful.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

ohsodelightful.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Oh So Delightful. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: