Tools & Wizards About Us
oiec.in screenshot

Report Summary

  • 42

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    61% of other websites

  • 70

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 35% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 79

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    40% of websites

oiec.in

OIEC Khanna | Study Visa Consultants Khanna | IELTS Institute Khanna | Spoken English Institute Khanna | Immigration Consultants Khanna | Interview Pr...

Page Load Speed

3.6 sec in total

First Response

363 ms

Resources Loaded

2.3 sec

Page Rendered

899 ms

oiec.in screenshot

About Website

Visit oiec.in now to see the best up-to-date OIEC content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about oiec.in

OIEC Khanna has positively affected the career outcomes of innumerable aspirants and our ongoing relationship with our students has been a gratifying story of unparalleled success...OIEC Khanna

Visit oiec.in

Key Findings

We analyzed Oiec.in page load time and found that the first response time was 363 ms and then it took 3.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

oiec.in performance score

42

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value7.5 s

1/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value9.1 s

1/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value11.8 s

4/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value210 ms

88/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.002

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value24.5 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

oiec.in

363 ms

bootstrap.min.css

442 ms

style.css

435 ms

responsive.css

261 ms

lg.jpg

454 ms

Our browser made a total of 76 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 89% of them (68 requests) were addressed to the original Oiec.in, 3% (2 requests) were made to Cdnjs.cloudflare.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Google.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (913 ms) belongs to the original domain Oiec.in.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 2.3 MB (35%)

Content Size

6.6 MB

After Optimization

4.3 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Oiec.in main page is 6.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 4.5 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 44.2 kB

  • Original 53.6 kB
  • After minification 42.3 kB
  • After compression 9.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 11.3 kB, which is 21% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 44.2 kB or 83% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-13%

Potential reduce by 560.8 kB

  • Original 4.5 MB
  • After minification 3.9 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, OIEC needs image optimization as it can save up to 560.8 kB or 13% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-73%

Potential reduce by 928.5 kB

  • Original 1.3 MB
  • After minification 1.1 MB
  • After compression 347.5 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 928.5 kB or 73% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-89%

Potential reduce by 757.7 kB

  • Original 849.7 kB
  • After minification 656.2 kB
  • After compression 92.1 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Oiec.in needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 757.7 kB or 89% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 40 (58%)

Requests Now

69

After Optimization

29

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 69 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of OIEC. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 18 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 24 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

oiec.in

oiec.in

363 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

442 ms

style.css

style.css

435 ms

responsive.css

responsive.css

261 ms

lg.jpg

lg.jpg

454 ms

studyhome.jpg

studyhome.jpg

349 ms

tourhome.jpg

tourhome.jpg

560 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

29 ms

embed

embed

310 ms

migration.jpg

migration.jpg

607 ms

hm12.png

hm12.png

521 ms

graduation.png

graduation.png

434 ms

h1.jpg

h1.jpg

521 ms

h2.jpg

h2.jpg

458 ms

h3.jpg

h3.jpg

695 ms

home3.jpg

home3.jpg

637 ms

t1.jpg

t1.jpg

608 ms

t2.jpg

t2.jpg

609 ms

t3.jpg

t3.jpg

651 ms

t4.jpg

t4.jpg

695 ms

b1.jpg

b1.jpg

697 ms

b4.jpg

b4.jpg

782 ms

whatsapp-logo.png

whatsapp-logo.png

727 ms

jquery-1.12.4.js

jquery-1.12.4.js

838 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

781 ms

bootsnav.js

bootsnav.js

782 ms

parallax.js

parallax.js

703 ms

scrollto.js

scrollto.js

735 ms

jquery-scrolltofixed-min.js

jquery-scrolltofixed-min.js

788 ms

jquery.counterup.js

jquery.counterup.js

790 ms

gallery.js

gallery.js

789 ms

wow.min.js

wow.min.js

790 ms

slider.js

slider.js

825 ms

video-player.js

video-player.js

849 ms

jquery.barfiller.js

jquery.barfiller.js

874 ms

timepicker.js

timepicker.js

875 ms

tweetie.js

tweetie.js

876 ms

color-switcher.js

color-switcher.js

875 ms

newscript.js

newscript.js

913 ms

js

js

53 ms

jquery-ui.min.css

jquery-ui.min.css

683 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

701 ms

css

css

25 ms

font-awesome-animation.min.css

font-awesome-animation.min.css

698 ms

elegantIcons.css

elegantIcons.css

693 ms

flaticon.css

flaticon.css

684 ms

pe-icon-7-stroke.css

pe-icon-7-stroke.css

655 ms

animate.css

animate.css

664 ms

bootsnav.css

bootsnav.css

615 ms

fullcalendar.min.css

fullcalendar.min.css

615 ms

slider.css

slider.css

582 ms

hover.css

hover.css

535 ms

fancyBox.css

fancyBox.css

571 ms

owl.css

owl.css

608 ms

isotop.css

isotop.css

585 ms

magnific-popup.css

magnific-popup.css

572 ms

flipclock.css

flipclock.css

528 ms

timecounter.css

timecounter.css

528 ms

3d-buttons.css

3d-buttons.css

571 ms

1.jpg

1.jpg

91 ms

2.jpg

2.jpg

175 ms

3.jpg

3.jpg

264 ms

1.jpg

1.jpg

184 ms

1.jpg

1.jpg

91 ms

homebg.jpg

homebg.jpg

108 ms

bg.jpg

bg.jpg

177 ms

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf

57 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

56 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

182 ms

Flaticon.svg

Flaticon.svg

214 ms

Flaticon.woff

Flaticon.woff

262 ms

ElegantIcons.woff

ElegantIcons.woff

276 ms

default.css

default.css

230 ms

embed

embed

178 ms

tweet.php

tweet.php

90 ms

js

js

34 ms

Accessibility Review

oiec.in accessibility score

70

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

oiec.in best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

oiec.in SEO score

79

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Oiec.in can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Oiec.in main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

oiec.in

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of OIEC. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: