2.7 sec in total
331 ms
2 sec
355 ms
Welcome to oldmoondigital.com homepage info - get ready to check Old Moon Digital best content right away, or after learning these important things about oldmoondigital.com
Looking for dependable Drupal expertise for your next project? We've built Drupal websites since 2011, get in touch now!
Visit oldmoondigital.comWe analyzed Oldmoondigital.com page load time and found that the first response time was 331 ms and then it took 2.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.
oldmoondigital.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.0 s
50/100
10%
Value7.0 s
6/100
25%
Value6.6 s
38/100
10%
Value430 ms
64/100
30%
Value0.042
99/100
15%
Value10.0 s
26/100
10%
331 ms
75 ms
119 ms
43 ms
21 ms
Our browser made a total of 29 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 59% of them (17 requests) were addressed to the original Oldmoondigital.com, 14% (4 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com and 14% (4 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (483 ms) belongs to the original domain Oldmoondigital.com.
Page size can be reduced by 228.1 kB (20%)
1.2 MB
937.4 kB
In fact, the total size of Oldmoondigital.com main page is 1.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Javascripts take 714.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 164.1 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 164.1 kB or 82% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 41.3 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Old Moon Digital needs image optimization as it can save up to 41.3 kB or 16% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 22.7 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Number of requests can be reduced by 21 (75%)
28
7
The browser has sent 28 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Old Moon Digital. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 18 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
oldmoondigital.com
331 ms
google_tag.script.js
75 ms
gtag.js
119 ms
css2
43 ms
logo.svg
21 ms
email-decode.min.js
28 ms
polyfill.min.js
62 ms
js_wipq0xnqiCEQjotmPv2mTm6mpaI08fwsrnY3YvwaO_s.js
172 ms
quicklink.umd.js
60 ms
js_Qsik1UkxOZFtjiGP3TAXgMhOPelyr_kfW4vJwXdoaZg.js
307 ms
oldmoondigital.script.js
170 ms
jquery.visible.min.js
123 ms
fontawesome.min.js
110 ms
light.min.js
319 ms
js_utxAG97nRGIB3PohcH6tYXM-uRaPLN7319Ypevh8nVU.js
483 ms
js
56 ms
js
97 ms
analytics.js
77 ms
js
49 ms
js
44 ms
collect
16 ms
collect
18 ms
collect
27 ms
gtm.js
85 ms
css_7NAKdJbneb0obx376nOKTZd0An5VlYvxhEL-6ADd0kM.css
423 ms
css_7NAKdJbneb0obx376nOKTZd0An5VlYvxhEL-6ADd0kM.css
162 ms
css_w4uQKn-4adVKxJltJSwqHgiggA1zOCZBP7ZnSg41iuc.css
180 ms
css_w4uQKn-4adVKxJltJSwqHgiggA1zOCZBP7ZnSg41iuc.css
175 ms
Vector.png
74 ms
oldmoondigital.com accessibility score
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
oldmoondigital.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
oldmoondigital.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Oldmoondigital.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Oldmoondigital.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
oldmoondigital.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Old Moon Digital. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: