Tools & Wizards About Us
oldorchardinn.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 30

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    50% of other websites

  • 95

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 86% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 85

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    55% of websites

oldorchardinn.com

Old Orchard Inn Resort and Spa – Everything Blossoms at the Old Orchard Inn

Page Load Speed

1.9 sec in total

First Response

51 ms

Resources Loaded

697 ms

Page Rendered

1.1 sec

oldorchardinn.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Old Orchard Inn content for Canada. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about oldorchardinn.com

Visit oldorchardinn.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Oldorchardinn.com page load time and found that the first response time was 51 ms and then it took 1.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

oldorchardinn.com performance score

30

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.6 s

31/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value10.9 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value6.8 s

34/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,010 ms

27/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value21.2 s

1/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

oldorchardinn.com

51 ms

oldorchardinn.com

144 ms

main.min.css

42 ms

css

33 ms

frontend.css

46 ms

Our browser made a total of 91 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 92% of them (84 requests) were addressed to the original Oldorchardinn.com, 3% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 2% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (250 ms) belongs to the original domain Oldorchardinn.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 250.7 kB (5%)

Content Size

4.8 MB

After Optimization

4.6 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Oldorchardinn.com main page is 4.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 4.3 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 206.1 kB

  • Original 244.3 kB
  • After minification 238.4 kB
  • After compression 38.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 206.1 kB or 84% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 41.7 kB

  • Original 4.3 MB
  • After minification 4.2 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Old Orchard Inn images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 946 B

  • Original 172.8 kB
  • After minification 172.3 kB
  • After compression 171.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 2.0 kB

  • Original 117.7 kB
  • After minification 117.7 kB
  • After compression 115.7 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Oldorchardinn.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 63 (72%)

Requests Now

88

After Optimization

25

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 88 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Old Orchard Inn. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 35 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 30 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

oldorchardinn.com

oldorchardinn.com

51 ms

oldorchardinn.com

oldorchardinn.com

144 ms

main.min.css

main.min.css

42 ms

css

css

33 ms

frontend.css

frontend.css

46 ms

woocommerce-layout-grid.min.css

woocommerce-layout-grid.min.css

45 ms

woocommerce-grid.min.css

woocommerce-grid.min.css

84 ms

tribe-events-single-skeleton.min.css

tribe-events-single-skeleton.min.css

64 ms

tribe-events-single-full.min.css

tribe-events-single-full.min.css

65 ms

widget-base.min.css

widget-base.min.css

67 ms

elementor-icons.min.css

elementor-icons.min.css

68 ms

frontend-lite.min.css

frontend-lite.min.css

91 ms

swiper.min.css

swiper.min.css

87 ms

post-3.css

post-3.css

87 ms

frontend-lite.min.css

frontend-lite.min.css

88 ms

global.css

global.css

89 ms

post-118.css

post-118.css

105 ms

post-24.css

post-24.css

104 ms

post-96.css

post-96.css

103 ms

general.min.css

general.min.css

107 ms

css

css

30 ms

fontawesome.min.css

fontawesome.min.css

129 ms

solid.min.css

solid.min.css

110 ms

brands.min.css

brands.min.css

123 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

147 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

124 ms

jquery.blockUI.min.js

jquery.blockUI.min.js

126 ms

add-to-cart.min.js

add-to-cart.min.js

135 ms

js.cookie.min.js

js.cookie.min.js

144 ms

woocommerce.min.js

woocommerce.min.js

143 ms

js

js

58 ms

widget-nav-menu.min.css

widget-nav-menu.min.css

146 ms

widget-loop-builder.min.css

widget-loop-builder.min.css

188 ms

widget-icon-list.min.css

widget-icon-list.min.css

187 ms

wc-blocks.css

wc-blocks.css

201 ms

animations.min.css

animations.min.css

202 ms

photoswipe.min.css

photoswipe.min.css

202 ms

default-skin.min.css

default-skin.min.css

203 ms

frontend.min.js

frontend.min.js

216 ms

sourcebuster.min.js

sourcebuster.min.js

215 ms

order-attribution.min.js

order-attribution.min.js

217 ms

general.min.js

general.min.js

204 ms

jquery.smartmenus.min.js

jquery.smartmenus.min.js

185 ms

imagesloaded.min.js

imagesloaded.min.js

182 ms

webpack-pro.runtime.min.js

webpack-pro.runtime.min.js

237 ms

webpack.runtime.min.js

webpack.runtime.min.js

237 ms

frontend-modules.min.js

frontend-modules.min.js

238 ms

hooks.min.js

hooks.min.js

234 ms

i18n.min.js

i18n.min.js

216 ms

frontend.min.js

frontend.min.js

216 ms

waypoints.min.js

waypoints.min.js

215 ms

core.min.js

core.min.js

215 ms

frontend.min.js

frontend.min.js

215 ms

elements-handlers.min.js

elements-handlers.min.js

209 ms

underscore-before.js

underscore-before.js

200 ms

underscore.min.js

underscore.min.js

200 ms

underscore-after.js

underscore-after.js

198 ms

wp-util.min.js

wp-util.min.js

198 ms

frontend.min.js

frontend.min.js

195 ms

jquery.zoom.min.js

jquery.zoom.min.js

182 ms

jquery.flexslider.min.js

jquery.flexslider.min.js

181 ms

photoswipe.min.js

photoswipe.min.js

179 ms

photoswipe-ui-default.min.js

photoswipe-ui-default.min.js

172 ms

add-to-cart-variation.min.js

add-to-cart-variation.min.js

171 ms

single-product.min.js

single-product.min.js

162 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

142 ms

Old-Orchard-Inn-logo-2023-1.svg

Old-Orchard-Inn-logo-2023-1.svg

190 ms

hotel3-708x1024.jpg

hotel3-708x1024.jpg

138 ms

patio-home.jpg

patio-home.jpg

250 ms

Old-Orchard-Deep-Roots-Promo-Banner-AD-1024x160.png

Old-Orchard-Deep-Roots-Promo-Banner-AD-1024x160.png

105 ms

King-with-Hide-a-bed-NEW-1024x683.jpg

King-with-Hide-a-bed-NEW-1024x683.jpg

156 ms

KingRm_Window_Door-1.jpg

KingRm_Window_Door-1.jpg

117 ms

Queen-with-Hide-a-Bed-1024x683.jpg

Queen-with-Hide-a-Bed-1024x683.jpg

161 ms

package-01.jpg

package-01.jpg

142 ms

oldo-cooking-2.jpg

oldo-cooking-2.jpg

216 ms

package-03.jpg

package-03.jpg

178 ms

final-file-300x169.png

final-file-300x169.png

177 ms

Resized-scaled-2.jpg

Resized-scaled-2.jpg

175 ms

spa-baner-2.jpg

spa-baner-2.jpg

174 ms

wine-girl-768x562.jpg

wine-girl-768x562.jpg

175 ms

chef-joe1.jpg

chef-joe1.jpg

139 ms

plate1.jpg

plate1.jpg

138 ms

5f28a8e7449cb86f750623f2_stars-testimonial-hotel-template.svg

5f28a8e7449cb86f750623f2_stars-testimonial-hotel-template.svg

137 ms

Chamber-Member-20232024-Color-PNG-250-%C3%97-250-px-150x150.png

Chamber-Member-20232024-Color-PNG-250-%C3%97-250-px-150x150.png

138 ms

CAFESeal-RGB-150x150.png

CAFESeal-RGB-150x150.png

138 ms

default-skin.png

default-skin.png

139 ms

font

font

56 ms

font

font

87 ms

font

font

89 ms

fa-brands-400.woff

fa-brands-400.woff

129 ms

woocommerce-smallscreen-grid.min.css

woocommerce-smallscreen-grid.min.css

21 ms

Accessibility Review

oldorchardinn.com accessibility score

95

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

oldorchardinn.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

oldorchardinn.com SEO score

85

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Oldorchardinn.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Oldorchardinn.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

oldorchardinn.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Old Orchard Inn. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: