9.1 sec in total
484 ms
8.2 sec
337 ms
Click here to check amazing Olimpck content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about olimpck.ru
В компании СК Олимп вы можете заказать изготовление лестничных ограждений из нержавеющей стали и стекла, любой сложности и конфигурации.
Visit olimpck.ruWe analyzed Olimpck.ru page load time and found that the first response time was 484 ms and then it took 8.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 85% of websites can load faster.
olimpck.ru performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value5.7 s
5/100
10%
Value5.7 s
17/100
25%
Value12.5 s
3/100
10%
Value190 ms
91/100
30%
Value0.114
86/100
15%
Value9.1 s
33/100
10%
484 ms
4841 ms
151 ms
88 ms
96 ms
Our browser made a total of 72 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 42% of them (30 requests) were addressed to the original Olimpck.ru, 33% (24 requests) were made to C0.wp.com and 14% (10 requests) were made to I0.wp.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (4.8 sec) belongs to the original domain Olimpck.ru.
Page size can be reduced by 152.2 kB (23%)
671.8 kB
519.7 kB
In fact, the total size of Olimpck.ru main page is 671.8 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 252.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 88.5 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 88.5 kB or 81% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 44 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Olimpck images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 61.6 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 61.6 kB or 24% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 2.0 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Olimpck.ru has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 54 (79%)
68
14
The browser has sent 68 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Olimpck. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 24 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 32 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
olimpck.ru
484 ms
olimpck.ru
4841 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
151 ms
style.min.css
88 ms
mediaelementplayer-legacy.min.css
96 ms
wp-mediaelement.min.css
98 ms
wc-blocks-vendors-style.css
91 ms
wc-blocks-style.css
99 ms
classic-themes.min.css
97 ms
A.styles.css,qver=5.6.4.pagespeed.cf.-dvEpspat2.css
294 ms
woocommerce-layout.css
109 ms
woocommerce.css
111 ms
A.jquery.bxslider.min.css,qver=4.2.51.pagespeed.cf.w4eAjcFhMa.css
391 ms
css
134 ms
A.font-awesome.min.css,qver=4.7.0.pagespeed.cf.jBrWCt-D4j.css
404 ms
A.style.css,qver=6.1.7.pagespeed.cf.5X2tlSAPPB.css
431 ms
elementor-icons.min.css
437 ms
A.frontend-legacy.min.css,qver=3.8.0.pagespeed.cf.9VHh6kdHp7.css
439 ms
frontend.min.css
593 ms
A.global.css,qver=1667927952.pagespeed.cf.dhgL6FO5MW.css
525 ms
A.post-8.css,qver=1667998465.pagespeed.cf.Fr0yctQIVQ.css
537 ms
A.pum-site-styles.css,qgenerated=1667928107,aver=1.16.12.pagespeed.cf.NIoF_7DiAQ.css
572 ms
style.min.css
117 ms
style.min.css
124 ms
style.min.css
129 ms
style.min.css
122 ms
style.min.css
121 ms
A.blocks.style.build.css,qver=3.2.4.pagespeed.cf.Ri6b1_l--S.css
581 ms
A.gutentor-woocommerce.css,qver=3.2.4.pagespeed.cf.vPlAC6se4M.css
590 ms
css
165 ms
A.fontawesome.min.css,qver=5.15.3.pagespeed.cf.Kybvi4lUrb.css
652 ms
jetpack.css
129 ms
jquery.min.js
140 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
139 ms
s-202439.js
134 ms
animations.min.css
738 ms
photon.min.js
136 ms
index.js
756 ms
index.js
755 ms
cf7msm.min.js
754 ms
jquery.blockUI.min.js
136 ms
add-to-cart.min.js
132 ms
js.cookie.min.js
135 ms
woocommerce.min.js
135 ms
cart-fragments.min.js
136 ms
themes,_supernews,_assets,_library,_bxslider,_js,_jquery.bxslider.js,qver==4.2.5.1+themes,_supernews,_assets,_library,_SlickNav,_jquery.slicknav.min.js,qver==1.0.7+plugins,_gutentor,_assets,_library,_theia-sticky-sidebar,_theia-sticky-sidebar.min.js,qver==4.0.1+themes,_supernews,_assets,_js,_supernews-custom.js,qver==1.0.1.pagespeed.jc.YDUxRsGY6K.js
758 ms
core.min.js
136 ms
pum-site-scripts.js,qdefer,agenerated=1667928107,aver=1.16.12.pagespeed.jm.u0S89KqMpA.js
778 ms
gutentor.js
813 ms
webpack.runtime.min.js
910 ms
frontend-modules.min.js
905 ms
waypoints.min.js
911 ms
swiper.min.js,qver=5.3.6.pagespeed.jm.0kJnTpXBgJ.js
1056 ms
share-link,_share-link.min.js,qver==3.8.0+dialog,_dialog.min.js,qver==4.9.0.pagespeed.jc.l2n-1DoEVB.js
906 ms
frontend.min.js,qver==3.8.0+preloaded-modules.min.js,qver==3.8.0.pagespeed.jc.rYv9t8M7La.js
932 ms
e-202439.js
129 ms
woocommerce-smallscreen.css
2 ms
css
25 ms
watch.js
65 ms
pic7.jpg
114 ms
pic5-e1591731683522.jpg
128 ms
pic12.jpg
129 ms
logo-1.png
131 ms
katalog12.jpg
93 ms
perila_dva_rigela-e1667997612673.png
134 ms
perila_tri_rigela.jpg
107 ms
perila_4_rigela.jpg
128 ms
lest4_2.jpg
129 ms
perila_steklo-e1667941291327.jpg
132 ms
font
52 ms
font
52 ms
fa-solid-900.woff
2146 ms
olimpck.ru accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
olimpck.ru best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
olimpck.ru SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
RU
RU
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Olimpck.ru can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Russian is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Olimpck.ru main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
olimpck.ru
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Olimpck. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: