3.7 sec in total
68 ms
3.5 sec
97 ms
Click here to check amazing OLM content for India. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about olm.net
OLM Cloud hosting services and solutions are powerful yet surprisingly affordable. We offer a full array of services including Cloud Hosting, Cloud Servers, Wordpress Management, Wordpress Security an...
Visit olm.netWe analyzed Olm.net page load time and found that the first response time was 68 ms and then it took 3.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.
olm.net performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.0 s
50/100
10%
Value10.6 s
0/100
25%
Value7.6 s
26/100
10%
Value220 ms
88/100
30%
Value0.174
69/100
15%
Value9.1 s
33/100
10%
68 ms
1729 ms
35 ms
45 ms
59 ms
Our browser made a total of 32 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 81% of them (26 requests) were addressed to the original Olm.net, 6% (2 requests) were made to S.adroll.com and 6% (2 requests) were made to D.adroll.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.7 sec) belongs to the original domain Olm.net.
Page size can be reduced by 315.0 kB (22%)
1.4 MB
1.1 MB
In fact, the total size of Olm.net main page is 1.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 79.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 79.2 kB or 79% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 235.0 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, OLM needs image optimization as it can save up to 235.0 kB or 21% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 288 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 446 B
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Olm.net has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 13 (45%)
29
16
The browser has sent 29 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of OLM. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 10 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
olm.net
68 ms
olm.net
1729 ms
css
35 ms
1678538258index.css
45 ms
1678538258index.css
59 ms
1712123348index.css
68 ms
1678538258index.css
64 ms
jquery.min.js
78 ms
1712122273index.js
55 ms
1712122273index.js
58 ms
mobmenu.js
59 ms
1678538259index.js
127 ms
1678538259index.js
126 ms
1678538259index.js
125 ms
roundtrip.js
389 ms
OLM_LOGO_200x55_tr_whtout.png
131 ms
OLM_SLIDER_FRONT_PAGE_900x300-2.png
175 ms
WP_SLIDDER_HANDS_SERVICES_900x300-2.png
148 ms
SiteMadeEasy_New_900x300.png
134 ms
INBOXSENTRY_SLIDER_900X300.png
175 ms
facebook.png
130 ms
twitter.png
136 ms
instagram.png
137 ms
youtube.png
148 ms
linkedin.png
151 ms
pinterest.png
152 ms
astra.woff
96 ms
BCCP3VS6HZD2JGQT42DECP
15 ms
sendrolling.js
5 ms
F37ZYQXII5HMVA2U5DDLND
3 ms
trigger
20 ms
olm.net
649 ms
olm.net accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
ARIA input fields do not have accessible names
ARIA toggle fields do not have accessible names
olm.net best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
olm.net SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Olm.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Olm.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
olm.net
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of OLM. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: