25.9 sec in total
466 ms
16.3 sec
9.1 sec
Click here to check amazing OMA content for Russia. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about oma.eu
OMA is a leading international partnership practicing architecture, urbanism, and cultural analysis.
Visit oma.euWe analyzed Oma.eu page load time and found that the first response time was 466 ms and then it took 25.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is an excellent result, as only a small number of websites can load faster.
oma.eu performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.7 s
61/100
10%
Value11.0 s
0/100
25%
Value6.9 s
33/100
10%
Value3,160 ms
2/100
30%
Value0.002
100/100
15%
Value12.3 s
15/100
10%
466 ms
331 ms
1297 ms
6744 ms
6730 ms
Our browser made a total of 14 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 7% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Oma.eu, 29% (4 requests) were made to Assets.oma.eu and 29% (4 requests) were made to S3-eu-west-1.amazonaws.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (6.7 sec) relates to the external source Assets.oma.eu.
Page size can be reduced by 197.3 kB (8%)
2.4 MB
2.2 MB
In fact, the total size of Oma.eu main page is 2.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 33.3 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 33.3 kB or 78% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 3.8 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. OMA images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 32.0 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 32.0 kB or 60% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 128.2 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Oma.eu needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 128.2 kB or 86% of the original size.
We found no issues to fix!
11
11
The browser has sent 11 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of OMA. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.
oma.eu
466 ms
main.css
331 ms
oma-www.js
1297 ms
f58a0715-f633-47e1-bb51-86573f6e331d.woff
6744 ms
d191f2d0-f50a-4a6d-a686-cb7355ad68f4.woff
6730 ms
analytics.js
2758 ms
*:oma.*$*
1407 ms
300.jpg
2333 ms
300.jpg
1600 ms
1600.jpg
3324 ms
700.jpg
2241 ms
collect
401 ms
17586813_640296522830467_4562253109513945088_n.jpg
406 ms
21149345_296394277501255_4813569616146071552_n.jpg
56 ms
oma.eu accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Links do not have a discernible name
Tables and lists
These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
List items (<li>) are not contained within <ul> or <ol> parent elements.
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
oma.eu best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
oma.eu SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
N/A
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Oma.eu can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Oma.eu main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
oma.eu
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of OMA. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: