10.4 sec in total
1.8 sec
7.9 sec
689 ms
Click here to check amazing Omegacompany content for Russia. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about omegacompany.ru
Экспертиза, оценка и юридическая помощь в срок от 1 дня +7(812)45-000-45. 14 лет опыта. Бесплатные консультация! Аккредитация. СРО. Отзывы. Звоните!
Visit omegacompany.ruWe analyzed Omegacompany.ru page load time and found that the first response time was 1.8 sec and then it took 8.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 85% of websites can load faster.
omegacompany.ru performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value5.2 s
8/100
10%
Value14.5 s
0/100
25%
Value16.7 s
0/100
10%
Value3,340 ms
2/100
30%
Value0.044
99/100
15%
Value16.5 s
5/100
10%
1803 ms
161 ms
479 ms
1058 ms
59 ms
Our browser made a total of 94 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 61% of them (57 requests) were addressed to the original Omegacompany.ru, 11% (10 requests) were made to W.uptolike.com and 3% (3 requests) were made to Mc.yandex.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.4 sec) belongs to the original domain Omegacompany.ru.
Page size can be reduced by 323.9 kB (22%)
1.5 MB
1.1 MB
In fact, the total size of Omegacompany.ru main page is 1.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 626.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 285.6 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 285.6 kB or 85% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 1.6 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Omegacompany images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 34.8 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 1.8 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Omegacompany.ru has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 43 (49%)
87
44
The browser has sent 87 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Omegacompany. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 32 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
omegacompany.ru
1803 ms
fxmrh.css
161 ms
fxmrh.css
479 ms
fxmrh.js
1058 ms
js
59 ms
jquery.form.min.js
416 ms
cf7mls.js
906 ms
scripts.js
907 ms
mediaelement-and-player.min.js
1049 ms
mediaelement-migrate.min.js
903 ms
wp-mediaelement.min.js
903 ms
core.min.js
1152 ms
position.min.js
1147 ms
pum-site-scripts.js
1261 ms
wp-embed.min.js
1152 ms
greensock.js
1354 ms
layerslider.kreaturamedia.jquery.js
1262 ms
layerslider.transitions.js
1354 ms
avia-footer-scripts-45ddf401ff2ad6998c1b9e403e161a33.js
1262 ms
c4s.2162.2780c9392497d73648073bbab4f209ae.js
1150 ms
tag.js
836 ms
hammer2.png
183 ms
lightlogo.png
276 ms
messengers.png
333 ms
msg00.png
332 ms
msg03.png
333 ms
msg04.png
663 ms
ms2.png
662 ms
ms1.png
416 ms
bg02.jpg
662 ms
fon02.jpg
662 ms
bg03.jpg
664 ms
eec64472-9c8e-47b5-b5c1-04c7c500632e.jpg
927 ms
vk3.webp
664 ms
meta.webp
664 ms
vetki-1.png
614 ms
sud2-705x323.jpg
865 ms
minishield.png
1715 ms
441.jpg
1846 ms
usl0.jpg
1845 ms
usl2-705x290.jpg
2096 ms
usl3.jpg
1716 ms
crim2.jpg
1839 ms
usl6-290x705.jpg
2392 ms
usl5-705x290.jpg
1996 ms
usl7.jpg
1993 ms
usl9.jpg
2004 ms
usl8.jpg
2005 ms
js
75 ms
analytics.js
28 ms
entypo-fontello.woff
2067 ms
uptolike.js
724 ms
1132871132
721 ms
collect
59 ms
collect
76 ms
css
44 ms
ga-audiences
257 ms
skin.css
1708 ms
ajax-loader.gif
1613 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4gaVc.ttf
33 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVc.ttf
47 ms
orig
526 ms
version.js
141 ms
advert.gif
769 ms
widgetsModule.js
268 ms
share-counter.html
133 ms
impression.html
332 ms
widgets-batch.js
318 ms
icon-muted-white.png
567 ms
icon-unmuted-white.png
1224 ms
k4.jpg
1350 ms
check.png
1223 ms
sync_cookie_image_decide
141 ms
icomoon.svg
132 ms
icomoon.woff
250 ms
extra.js
259 ms
watch.js
1 ms
1
148 ms
collect_stat.js
1506 ms
marking.js
760 ms
loading.gif
618 ms
icon-muted-black.png
616 ms
icon-unmuted-black.png
782 ms
share.php
499 ms
share.php
525 ms
dk
638 ms
dk
650 ms
count.json
22 ms
count.json
22 ms
share_count
754 ms
share_count
759 ms
support.html
134 ms
831 ms
k5.jpg
293 ms
omegacompany.ru accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
[aria-hidden="true"] elements contain focusable descendents
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
omegacompany.ru best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
omegacompany.ru SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
RU
RU
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Omegacompany.ru can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Russian is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Omegacompany.ru main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
omegacompany.ru
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Omegacompany. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: