Report Summary

  • 54

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    72% of other websites

  • 94

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 84% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    81% of websites

  • 82

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    44% of websites

omegaletter.com

Omegaletter | What's this world coming to?

Page Load Speed

865 ms in total

First Response

52 ms

Resources Loaded

348 ms

Page Rendered

465 ms

omegaletter.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to omegaletter.com homepage info - get ready to check Omegaletter best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about omegaletter.com

What's this world coming to?

Visit omegaletter.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Omegaletter.com page load time and found that the first response time was 52 ms and then it took 813 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 15% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

omegaletter.com performance score

54

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.0 s

24/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.7 s

32/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.5 s

73/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value130 ms

96/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.935

3/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value5.3 s

73/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

omegaletter.com

52 ms

index.asp

96 ms

omega.css

34 ms

aspajax.asp

46 ms

morebutton.js

38 ms

Our browser made a total of 40 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 83% of them (33 requests) were addressed to the original Omegaletter.com, 18% (7 requests) were made to Jpost.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (152 ms) relates to the external source Jpost.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 91.5 kB (10%)

Content Size

891.0 kB

After Optimization

799.5 kB

In fact, the total size of Omegaletter.com main page is 891.0 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 831.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-72%

Potential reduce by 27.0 kB

  • Original 37.5 kB
  • After minification 36.3 kB
  • After compression 10.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 27.0 kB or 72% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-5%

Potential reduce by 45.4 kB

  • Original 831.2 kB
  • After minification 785.8 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Omegaletter images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-48%

Potential reduce by 317 B

  • Original 666 B
  • After minification 542 B
  • After compression 349 B

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 317 B or 48% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-86%

Potential reduce by 18.8 kB

  • Original 21.7 kB
  • After minification 15.9 kB
  • After compression 2.9 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Omegaletter.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 18.8 kB or 86% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

38

After Optimization

38

The browser has sent 38 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Omegaletter. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Accessibility Review

omegaletter.com accessibility score

94

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

omegaletter.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

omegaletter.com SEO score

82

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    ISO-8859-1

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Omegaletter.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Omegaletter.com main page’s claimed encoding is iso-8859-1. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Omegaletter. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: