Report Summary

  • 28

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    47% of other websites

  • 65

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 30% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 91

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    70% of websites

omegatechnical.services

Omega Technical Services - Catering Engineers | Wrexham | Chester | North West

Page Load Speed

4 sec in total

First Response

740 ms

Resources Loaded

2.9 sec

Page Rendered

437 ms

omegatechnical.services screenshot

About Website

Welcome to omegatechnical.services homepage info - get ready to check Omega Technical best content right away, or after learning these important things about omegatechnical.services

Welcome to Omega Technical Services, your commercial catering equipment service partner. Omega offer commercial catering engineers in Wrexham, Chester and the North West. Omega cover a multitude of ca...

Visit omegatechnical.services

Key Findings

We analyzed Omegatechnical.services page load time and found that the first response time was 740 ms and then it took 3.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

omegatechnical.services performance score

28

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.6 s

14/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value12.6 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value7.9 s

23/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value530 ms

55/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.292

41/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value11.4 s

19/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.omegatechnical.services

740 ms

css

17 ms

twiget.css

133 ms

layerslider.css

145 ms

style.min.css

141 ms

Our browser made a total of 101 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 73% of them (74 requests) were addressed to the original Omegatechnical.services, 6% (6 requests) were made to Apis.google.com and 4% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (888 ms) belongs to the original domain Omegatechnical.services.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 201.2 kB (14%)

Content Size

1.5 MB

After Optimization

1.3 MB

In fact, the total size of Omegatechnical.services main page is 1.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 783.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-80%

Potential reduce by 82.6 kB

  • Original 102.6 kB
  • After minification 100.7 kB
  • After compression 20.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 82.6 kB or 80% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-7%

Potential reduce by 54.7 kB

  • Original 783.5 kB
  • After minification 728.8 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Omega Technical images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-10%

Potential reduce by 44.3 kB

  • Original 465.9 kB
  • After minification 465.9 kB
  • After compression 421.6 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-19%

Potential reduce by 19.6 kB

  • Original 101.1 kB
  • After minification 100.8 kB
  • After compression 81.5 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Omegatechnical.services needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 19.6 kB or 19% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 44 (47%)

Requests Now

93

After Optimization

49

The browser has sent 93 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Omega Technical. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 31 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 15 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

omegatechnical.services accessibility score

65

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-hidden="true"] elements contain focusable descendents

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

omegatechnical.services best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

omegatechnical.services SEO score

91

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Omegatechnical.services can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Omegatechnical.services main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Omega Technical. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: