Tools & Wizards About Us
omessenger.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 65

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    78% of other websites

  • 76

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 42% of websites

  • 58

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    20% of websites

  • 69

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    28% of websites

omessenger.com

LAN Instant Messenger - Outlook Messenger is now OMessenger

Page Load Speed

1000 ms in total

First Response

91 ms

Resources Loaded

666 ms

Page Rendered

243 ms

omessenger.com screenshot

About Website

Visit omessenger.com now to see the best up-to-date OMessenger content for Indonesia and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about omessenger.com

OMessenger is an interoffice Instant Messaging Software. Download this Office LAN chat instant Messenger. Best network LAN Messenger

Visit omessenger.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Omessenger.com page load time and found that the first response time was 91 ms and then it took 909 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 20% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

omessenger.com performance score

65

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value1.6 s

94/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.4 s

67/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value1.9 s

100/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value730 ms

41/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.164

72/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value6.9 s

54/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

omessenger.com

91 ms

oms.css

31 ms

jquery.min.js

110 ms

js

118 ms

gtm.js

85 ms

Our browser made a total of 40 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 60% of them (24 requests) were addressed to the original Omessenger.com, 15% (6 requests) were made to Apis.google.com and 8% (3 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (274 ms) relates to the external source Developers.google.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 31.6 kB (10%)

Content Size

309.0 kB

After Optimization

277.4 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Omessenger.com main page is 309.0 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 193.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-69%

Potential reduce by 19.4 kB

  • Original 28.0 kB
  • After minification 23.5 kB
  • After compression 8.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 4.6 kB, which is 16% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 19.4 kB or 69% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-11%

Potential reduce by 9.0 kB

  • Original 81.1 kB
  • After minification 72.1 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, OMessenger needs image optimization as it can save up to 9.0 kB or 11% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 815 B

  • Original 193.2 kB
  • After minification 193.2 kB
  • After compression 192.4 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-35%

Potential reduce by 2.3 kB

  • Original 6.7 kB
  • After minification 6.7 kB
  • After compression 4.4 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Omessenger.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 2.3 kB or 35% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 22 (59%)

Requests Now

37

After Optimization

15

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 37 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of OMessenger. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 11 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

omessenger.com

omessenger.com

91 ms

oms.css

oms.css

31 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

110 ms

js

js

118 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

85 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

21 ms

plusone.js

plusone.js

109 ms

down-arrow.png

down-arrow.png

73 ms

logo.png

logo.png

124 ms

menu_arrow.png

menu_arrow.png

124 ms

menu_bg.png

menu_bg.png

124 ms

header.jpg

header.jpg

125 ms

icon-windows.png

icon-windows.png

123 ms

icon-mac.png

icon-mac.png

123 ms

icon-linux.png

icon-linux.png

153 ms

icon-android.png

icon-android.png

153 ms

icon-iphone.png

icon-iphone.png

153 ms

icon-ipad.png

icon-ipad.png

151 ms

bg-content-1.png

bg-content-1.png

166 ms

icon_lan.png

icon_lan.png

166 ms

icon_vpn.png

icon_vpn.png

176 ms

anywhere.png

anywhere.png

176 ms

Customer1.gif

Customer1.gif

175 ms

arrow.gif

arrow.gif

175 ms

twitter.png

twitter.png

175 ms

facebook.png

facebook.png

174 ms

bg-submenu-td1.png

bg-submenu-td1.png

257 ms

bg-submenu-td2.png

bg-submenu-td2.png

257 ms

bg-submenu-td3.png

bg-submenu-td3.png

257 ms

collect

collect

85 ms

collect

collect

58 ms

cb=gapi.loaded_0

cb=gapi.loaded_0

17 ms

cb=gapi.loaded_1

cb=gapi.loaded_1

36 ms

fastbutton

fastbutton

29 ms

js

js

43 ms

postmessageRelay

postmessageRelay

97 ms

developers.google.com

developers.google.com

274 ms

3636781319-postmessagerelay.js

3636781319-postmessagerelay.js

26 ms

rpc:shindig_random.js

rpc:shindig_random.js

6 ms

cb=gapi.loaded_0

cb=gapi.loaded_0

4 ms

Accessibility Review

omessenger.com accessibility score

76

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).

Best Practices

omessenger.com best practices score

58

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

omessenger.com SEO score

69

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Omessenger.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Omessenger.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

omessenger.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of OMessenger. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: