3.5 sec in total
446 ms
2.7 sec
425 ms
Welcome to ompile.com homepage info - get ready to check Ompile best content right away, or after learning these important things about ompile.com
Welcome to Ompile With more then 45 years of experience, we specialize in solid and patterned velvet woven from natural yarns like Cotton, Wool and man-made yarns like Rayon, Polyester and Viscose. - ...
Visit ompile.comWe analyzed Ompile.com page load time and found that the first response time was 446 ms and then it took 3.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.
ompile.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value5.0 s
9/100
10%
Value12.8 s
0/100
25%
Value12.0 s
4/100
10%
Value370 ms
70/100
30%
Value0.016
100/100
15%
Value12.5 s
14/100
10%
446 ms
857 ms
17 ms
34 ms
30 ms
Our browser made a total of 101 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 88% of them (89 requests) were addressed to the original Ompile.com, 11% (11 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 1% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1 sec) belongs to the original domain Ompile.com.
Page size can be reduced by 177.7 kB (5%)
3.6 MB
3.5 MB
In fact, the total size of Ompile.com main page is 3.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only a small number of websites need less resources to load. Images take 3.0 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 78.7 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 78.7 kB or 82% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 78.2 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Ompile images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 14.4 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 6.4 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Ompile.com has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 71 (82%)
87
16
The browser has sent 87 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Ompile. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 50 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 23 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
ompile.com
446 ms
ompile.com
857 ms
frontend.min.css
17 ms
style.min.css
34 ms
styles.css
30 ms
rs6.css
38 ms
style.css
27 ms
plugins.min.css
28 ms
modules.min.css
53 ms
font-awesome.min.css
46 ms
style.min.css
48 ms
ionicons.min.css
49 ms
style.css
64 ms
simple-line-icons.css
66 ms
dripicons.css
71 ms
modules-responsive.min.css
68 ms
blog-responsive.min.css
71 ms
style_dynamic_responsive.css
69 ms
style_dynamic.css
67 ms
js_composer.min.css
75 ms
css
70 ms
select2.min.css
73 ms
core-dashboard.min.css
71 ms
modern.css
71 ms
jquery.min.js
74 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
115 ms
scrolltoplugin.min.js
114 ms
revolution.tools.min.js
118 ms
rs6.min.js
151 ms
animate.min.css
189 ms
hooks.min.js
186 ms
i18n.min.js
187 ms
index.js
196 ms
index.js
197 ms
core.min.js
197 ms
tabs.min.js
200 ms
accordion.min.js
202 ms
mediaelement-and-player.min.js
206 ms
mediaelement-migrate.min.js
214 ms
wp-mediaelement.min.js
197 ms
mouse.min.js
185 ms
slider.min.js
206 ms
jquery.appear.js
207 ms
modernizr.custom.85257.js
196 ms
hoverIntent.min.js
193 ms
jquery.plugin.js
288 ms
jquery.countdown.min.js
288 ms
owl.carousel.min.js
274 ms
parallax.min.js
271 ms
easypiechart.js
271 ms
jquery.waypoints.min.js
273 ms
Chart.min.js
298 ms
counter.js
297 ms
fluidvids.min.js
300 ms
jquery.prettyPhoto.js
300 ms
jquery.nicescroll.min.js
300 ms
TweenLite.min.js
301 ms
jquery.mixitup.min.js
307 ms
jquery.waitforimages.js
305 ms
jquery.infinitescroll.min.js
266 ms
jquery.easing.1.3.js
264 ms
particles.min.js
262 ms
skrollr.js
262 ms
bootstrapCarousel.js
194 ms
jquery.touchSwipe.min.js
192 ms
absoluteCounter.min.js
192 ms
jquery.draggable.min.js
185 ms
jquery.touchpunch.min.js
184 ms
isotope.pkgd.min.js
184 ms
smoothPageScroll.js
181 ms
modules.min.js
180 ms
comment-reply.min.js
178 ms
js_composer_front.min.js
177 ms
like.min.js
177 ms
vc-waypoints.min.js
168 ms
Ompile-Logo-1.png
166 ms
preload_pattern.png
159 ms
slider02-1.jpg
159 ms
slider03.jpg
157 ms
slider01.jpg
61 ms
pixel-video.png
58 ms
OmpileVideo-SliderImage-02.jpg
58 ms
Trans001.jpeg
60 ms
noise-background.jpg
235 ms
Apprael-color-1.jpg
56 ms
furnishing-color-1.jpg
103 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvoorCGPrQ.ttf
222 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvaorCGPrQ.ttf
250 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVuEorCGPrQ.ttf
249 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVtaorCGPrQ.ttf
250 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvao7CGPrQ.ttf
251 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVsEpbCGPrQ.ttf
286 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVs9pbCGPrQ.ttf
288 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVtapbCGPrQ.ttf
287 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVtzpbCGPrQ.ttf
287 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
1004 ms
EJRVQgYoZZY2vCFuvAFYzro.ttf
286 ms
EJRSQgYoZZY2vCFuvAnt66qcVy4.ttf
286 ms
curtains-color-1.jpg
230 ms
Ompile-BusSeatVelvet-01.jpg
203 ms
mill03.jpg
261 ms
ompile.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
ompile.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
ompile.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Ompile.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Ompile.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
ompile.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Ompile. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: