Tools & Wizards About Us
onagoodnote.net screenshot

Report Summary

  • 45

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    65% of other websites

  • 98

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 95% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    57% of websites

  • 88

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    66% of websites

onagoodnote.net

On A Good Note – Enjoying life, one music-filled, coffee-fueled moment at a time

Page Load Speed

4.3 sec in total

First Response

1.1 sec

Resources Loaded

2.8 sec

Page Rendered

350 ms

onagoodnote.net screenshot

About Website

Welcome to onagoodnote.net homepage info - get ready to check On A Good Note best content right away, or after learning these important things about onagoodnote.net

Providing music therapy services across central Illinois! Check out our website to learn more about music therapy, On A Good Note, and music lessons. Also, click to register for a music therapy consul...

Visit onagoodnote.net

Key Findings

We analyzed Onagoodnote.net page load time and found that the first response time was 1.1 sec and then it took 3.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

onagoodnote.net performance score

45

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value15.1 s

0/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value19.6 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value28.3 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value80 ms

99/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.001

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value18.9 s

3/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.onagoodnote.net

1132 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

133 ms

public.css

129 ms

css-front.css

131 ms

style.min.css

262 ms

Our browser made a total of 55 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 56% of them (31 requests) were addressed to the original Onagoodnote.net, 27% (15 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 7% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.1 sec) belongs to the original domain Onagoodnote.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 445.1 kB (68%)

Content Size

655.9 kB

After Optimization

210.8 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Onagoodnote.net main page is 655.9 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. CSS take 303.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-78%

Potential reduce by 49.6 kB

  • Original 63.7 kB
  • After minification 61.2 kB
  • After compression 14.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 49.6 kB or 78% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-5%

Potential reduce by 2.9 kB

  • Original 62.8 kB
  • After minification 59.9 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. On A Good Note images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-71%

Potential reduce by 160.9 kB

  • Original 225.4 kB
  • After minification 215.7 kB
  • After compression 64.6 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 160.9 kB or 71% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-76%

Potential reduce by 231.7 kB

  • Original 303.9 kB
  • After minification 267.1 kB
  • After compression 72.3 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Onagoodnote.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 231.7 kB or 76% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 28 (74%)

Requests Now

38

After Optimization

10

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 38 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of On A Good Note. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 15 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 15 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

www.onagoodnote.net

www.onagoodnote.net

1132 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

wp-emoji-release.min.js

133 ms

public.css

public.css

129 ms

css-front.css

css-front.css

131 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

262 ms

social_widget.css

social_widget.css

139 ms

css

css

19 ms

css

css

24 ms

css

css

17 ms

header-standard.css

header-standard.css

134 ms

font-awesome.css

font-awesome.css

255 ms

style.css

style.css

318 ms

css

css

18 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

264 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

199 ms

slim-081711.css

slim-081711.css

295 ms

dashicons.min.css

dashicons.min.css

354 ms

frontend_style.css

frontend_style.css

245 ms

jquery.fancybox.min.css

jquery.fancybox.min.css

353 ms

pinit.js

pinit.js

33 ms

navigation.js

navigation.js

352 ms

jquery.carouFredSel-6.2.1-packed.js

jquery.carouFredSel-6.2.1-packed.js

354 ms

jquery.touchSwipe.min.js

jquery.touchSwipe.min.js

353 ms

jquery.fittext.min.js

jquery.fittext.min.js

438 ms

jquery.fitbutton.min.js

jquery.fitbutton.min.js

440 ms

jquery.fitvids.min.js

jquery.fitvids.min.js

445 ms

custom.js

custom.js

445 ms

skip-link-focus-fix.js

skip-link-focus-fix.js

446 ms

search_btn_bg.png

search_btn_bg.png

124 ms

cropped-DSC_0634-1.jpg

cropped-DSC_0634-1.jpg

146 ms

rss.png

rss.png

146 ms

facebook.png

facebook.png

146 ms

twitter.png

twitter.png

146 ms

email.png

email.png

148 ms

pinterest.png

pinterest.png

149 ms

loader.gif

loader.gif

178 ms

S6u9w4BMUTPHh7USSwiPHA.ttf

S6u9w4BMUTPHh7USSwiPHA.ttf

84 ms

S6u8w4BMUTPHh30AXC-v.ttf

S6u8w4BMUTPHh30AXC-v.ttf

84 ms

S6uyw4BMUTPHjx4wWw.ttf

S6uyw4BMUTPHjx4wWw.ttf

81 ms

S6u9w4BMUTPHh6UVSwiPHA.ttf

S6u9w4BMUTPHh6UVSwiPHA.ttf

80 ms

vm8vdRfvXFLG3OLnsO15WYS5DG74wNc.ttf

vm8vdRfvXFLG3OLnsO15WYS5DG74wNc.ttf

86 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

260 ms

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvaorCIPrQ.ttf

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvaorCIPrQ.ttf

84 ms

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvoorCIPrQ.ttf

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvoorCIPrQ.ttf

89 ms

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVuEorCIPrQ.ttf

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVuEorCIPrQ.ttf

85 ms

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvao7CIPrQ.ttf

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvao7CIPrQ.ttf

88 ms

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVsEpbCIPrQ.ttf

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVsEpbCIPrQ.ttf

87 ms

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVs9pbCIPrQ.ttf

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVs9pbCIPrQ.ttf

88 ms

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVtapbCIPrQ.ttf

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVtapbCIPrQ.ttf

89 ms

all.js

all.js

23 ms

S6u_w4BMUTPHjxsI9w2_Gwfo.ttf

S6u_w4BMUTPHjxsI9w2_Gwfo.ttf

60 ms

S6u8w4BMUTPHjxsAXC-v.ttf

S6u8w4BMUTPHjxsAXC-v.ttf

60 ms

S6u_w4BMUTPHjxsI5wq_Gwfo.ttf

S6u_w4BMUTPHjxsI5wq_Gwfo.ttf

59 ms

all.js

all.js

44 ms

pinit_main.js

pinit_main.js

118 ms

Accessibility Review

onagoodnote.net accessibility score

98

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best Practices

onagoodnote.net best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

onagoodnote.net SEO score

88

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Onagoodnote.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Onagoodnote.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

onagoodnote.net

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of On A Good Note. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: