Tools & Wizards About Us
onapp.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 14

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    26% of other websites

  • 91

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 77% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    56% of websites

  • 90

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    68% of websites

onapp.com

OnApp: the cloud success platform for Telcos & MSPs

Page Load Speed

2.1 sec in total

First Response

295 ms

Resources Loaded

1.7 sec

Page Rendered

154 ms

onapp.com screenshot

About Website

Visit onapp.com now to see the best up-to-date On App content for Pakistan and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about onapp.com

Suddenly, cloud becomes clear. Powered by innovation, freed from complexity and built for business: OnApp is the cloud success platform for Telcos & MSPs.

Visit onapp.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Onapp.com page load time and found that the first response time was 295 ms and then it took 1.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

onapp.com performance score

14

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value6.8 s

1/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value7.2 s

5/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value13.4 s

2/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value830 ms

35/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.709

7/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value16.1 s

6/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

onapp.com

295 ms

bootstrap.css

484 ms

style2015.css

411 ms

ae993575-c5d7-4a11-8962-52f889d0463c.css

125 ms

nivo-slider.css

165 ms

Our browser made a total of 47 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 55% of them (26 requests) were addressed to the original Onapp.com, 4% (2 requests) were made to Fast.fonts.com and 4% (2 requests) were made to Munchkin.marketo.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (972 ms) belongs to the original domain Onapp.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 777.0 kB (60%)

Content Size

1.3 MB

After Optimization

509.3 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Onapp.com main page is 1.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 645.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-74%

Potential reduce by 22.4 kB

  • Original 30.1 kB
  • After minification 26.0 kB
  • After compression 7.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 4.1 kB, which is 14% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 22.4 kB or 74% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-20%

Potential reduce by 70.5 kB

  • Original 344.8 kB
  • After minification 274.3 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, On App needs image optimization as it can save up to 70.5 kB or 20% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-70%

Potential reduce by 454.4 kB

  • Original 645.9 kB
  • After minification 585.5 kB
  • After compression 191.5 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 454.4 kB or 70% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-87%

Potential reduce by 229.7 kB

  • Original 265.5 kB
  • After minification 215.7 kB
  • After compression 35.8 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Onapp.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 229.7 kB or 87% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 31 (72%)

Requests Now

43

After Optimization

12

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 43 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of On App. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 23 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

onapp.com

onapp.com

295 ms

bootstrap.css

bootstrap.css

484 ms

style2015.css

style2015.css

411 ms

ae993575-c5d7-4a11-8962-52f889d0463c.css

ae993575-c5d7-4a11-8962-52f889d0463c.css

125 ms

nivo-slider.css

nivo-slider.css

165 ms

default.css

default.css

166 ms

modernizr-2.0.6.min.js

modernizr-2.0.6.min.js

246 ms

jquery-1.11.3.min.js

jquery-1.11.3.min.js

419 ms

jquery.tools.min.js

jquery.tools.min.js

661 ms

jquery.nivo.slider.pack.js

jquery.nivo.slider.pack.js

328 ms

jquery.prettyphoto.js

jquery.prettyphoto.js

525 ms

jquery.ui.core.js

jquery.ui.core.js

526 ms

jquery.ui.widget.js

jquery.ui.widget.js

566 ms

jquery.ui.position.js

jquery.ui.position.js

571 ms

jquery.ui.selectmenu.js

jquery.ui.selectmenu.js

717 ms

jquery.hoverintent.js

jquery.hoverintent.js

648 ms

jquery.tools.validator.js

jquery.tools.validator.js

654 ms

plugins.js

plugins.js

726 ms

script.js

script.js

732 ms

buttons.js

buttons.js

11 ms

bootstrap.js

bootstrap.js

972 ms

munchkin.js

munchkin.js

45 ms

global-sprites.png

global-sprites.png

116 ms

srch.png

srch.png

83 ms

hero.png

hero.png

413 ms

home-platform.png

home-platform.png

286 ms

home-vmware.png

home-vmware.png

211 ms

home-federation.png

home-federation.png

247 ms

pr-bkgnd.png

pr-bkgnd.png

412 ms

UKCA-Winner-logo.png

UKCA-Winner-logo.png

385 ms

a32c3a17-3242-461c-a048-ca8e775582b1.woff

a32c3a17-3242-461c-a048-ca8e775582b1.woff

30 ms

ga.js

ga.js

39 ms

munchkin.js

munchkin.js

6 ms

wc.js

wc.js

78 ms

visitWebPage

visitWebPage

161 ms

__utm.gif

__utm.gif

13 ms

collect

collect

100 ms

getAllAppDefault.esi

getAllAppDefault.esi

14 ms

2776.js

2776.js

29 ms

ga-audiences

ga-audiences

50 ms

getSegment.php

getSegment.php

187 ms

checkOAuth.esi

checkOAuth.esi

7 ms

s

s

58 ms

t.js

t.js

36 ms

u

u

58 ms

s

s

10 ms

t.dhj

t.dhj

40 ms

Accessibility Review

onapp.com accessibility score

91

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

onapp.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

onapp.com SEO score

90

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Onapp.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Onapp.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

onapp.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of On App. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: