Tools & Wizards About Us
onepoundfish.net screenshot

Report Summary

  • 0

    Performance

  • 0

    Accessibility

  • 0

    Best Practices

  • 0

    SEO

onepoundfish.net

onepoundfish.net

Page Load Speed

5.5 sec in total

First Response

842 ms

Resources Loaded

4.4 sec

Page Rendered

220 ms

onepoundfish.net screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Onepoundfish content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about onepoundfish.net

This domain may be for sale!

Visit onepoundfish.net

Key Findings

We analyzed Onepoundfish.net page load time and found that the first response time was 842 ms and then it took 4.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

onepoundfish.net performance score

0

Network Requests Diagram

onepoundfish.net

842 ms

jquery.min.js

55 ms

config.js

434 ms

styles.css

1653 ms

textstyles.css

1041 ms

Our browser made a total of 20 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 95% of them (19 requests) were addressed to the original Onepoundfish.net, 5% (1 request) were made to Ajax.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.7 sec) belongs to the original domain Onepoundfish.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 97.9 kB (82%)

Content Size

119.6 kB

After Optimization

21.8 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Onepoundfish.net main page is 119.6 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only 10% of websites need less resources to load. CSS take 106.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-60%

Potential reduce by 4.9 kB

  • Original 8.1 kB
  • After minification 8.1 kB
  • After compression 3.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 4.9 kB or 60% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-4%

Potential reduce by 147 B

  • Original 3.9 kB
  • After minification 3.8 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Onepoundfish images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-74%

Potential reduce by 691 B

  • Original 935 B
  • After minification 534 B
  • After compression 244 B

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 691 B or 74% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-86%

Potential reduce by 92.2 kB

  • Original 106.6 kB
  • After minification 86.2 kB
  • After compression 14.5 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Onepoundfish.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 92.2 kB or 86% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 9 (47%)

Requests Now

19

After Optimization

10

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 19 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Onepoundfish. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

onepoundfish.net

onepoundfish.net

842 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

55 ms

config.js

config.js

434 ms

styles.css

styles.css

1653 ms

textstyles.css

textstyles.css

1041 ms

header.jpg

header.jpg

1452 ms

tables.css

tables.css

385 ms

commonstyles.css

commonstyles.css

946 ms

top_bg.gif

top_bg.gif

198 ms

border_bg.gif

border_bg.gif

219 ms

rss_button.png

rss_button.png

227 ms

sitemap_button.png

sitemap_button.png

207 ms

headerbox_bg.gif

headerbox_bg.gif

644 ms

headerbox_inner.gif

headerbox_inner.gif

1169 ms

h3_bg.gif

h3_bg.gif

554 ms

h5.png

h5.png

400 ms

menu_title_bg.gif

menu_title_bg.gif

586 ms

menulist_li_bg.gif

menulist_li_bg.gif

420 ms

menu_bg.png

menu_bg.png

581 ms

pagetop_button.png

pagetop_button.png

614 ms

SEO Factors

onepoundfish.net SEO score

0

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    JA

  • Encoding

    SHIFT_JIS

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Onepoundfish.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it does not match the claimed Japanese language. Our system also found out that Onepoundfish.net main page’s claimed encoding is shift_jis. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

onepoundfish.net

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Onepoundfish. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: