Tools & Wizards About Us
onerockwell.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 20

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    37% of other websites

  • 91

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 77% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    56% of websites

  • 92

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    75% of websites

onerockwell.com

1R Agency

Page Load Speed

2.2 sec in total

First Response

66 ms

Resources Loaded

1.9 sec

Page Rendered

276 ms

onerockwell.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Onerockwell content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about onerockwell.com

We are a global, full-service agency that partners with innovators and creators to power commerce.

Visit onerockwell.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Onerockwell.com page load time and found that the first response time was 66 ms and then it took 2.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

onerockwell.com performance score

20

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.0 s

51/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value9.6 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value11.4 s

5/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,020 ms

26/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.297

40/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value17.7 s

4/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

onerockwell.com

66 ms

www.onerockwell.com

1251 ms

twemoji.js

17 ms

wp-emoji.js

19 ms

styles.css

20 ms

Our browser made a total of 61 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 89% of them (54 requests) were addressed to the original Onerockwell.com, 5% (3 requests) were made to S.gravatar.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.3 sec) belongs to the original domain Onerockwell.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 450.9 kB (4%)

Content Size

11.5 MB

After Optimization

11.1 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Onerockwell.com main page is 11.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 11.0 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-81%

Potential reduce by 32.8 kB

  • Original 40.3 kB
  • After minification 29.9 kB
  • After compression 7.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 10.4 kB, which is 26% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 32.8 kB or 81% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 1.5 kB

  • Original 11.0 MB
  • After minification 11.0 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Onerockwell images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-72%

Potential reduce by 294.8 kB

  • Original 410.4 kB
  • After minification 335.4 kB
  • After compression 115.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 294.8 kB or 72% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-89%

Potential reduce by 121.9 kB

  • Original 137.4 kB
  • After minification 105.8 kB
  • After compression 15.5 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Onerockwell.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 121.9 kB or 89% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 21 (38%)

Requests Now

55

After Optimization

34

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 55 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Onerockwell. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 18 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

onerockwell.com

onerockwell.com

66 ms

www.onerockwell.com

www.onerockwell.com

1251 ms

twemoji.js

twemoji.js

17 ms

wp-emoji.js

wp-emoji.js

19 ms

styles.css

styles.css

20 ms

style.css

style.css

19 ms

master.css

master.css

31 ms

jquery.js

jquery.js

40 ms

jquery-migrate.js

jquery-migrate.js

39 ms

jquery.form.min.js

jquery.form.min.js

38 ms

scripts.js

scripts.js

39 ms

gprofiles.js

gprofiles.js

66 ms

wpgroho.js

wpgroho.js

37 ms

skip-link-focus-fix.js

skip-link-focus-fix.js

64 ms

socialshare.min.js

socialshare.min.js

64 ms

slimscroll.min.js

slimscroll.min.js

64 ms

fullpage.js

fullpage.js

68 ms

slick.min.js

slick.min.js

66 ms

masonry.min.js

masonry.min.js

66 ms

visible.min.js

visible.min.js

66 ms

onerockwell.js

onerockwell.js

67 ms

devicepx-jetpack.js

devicepx-jetpack.js

4 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

30 ms

abccarpetandhome_2.jpg

abccarpetandhome_2.jpg

188 ms

Calypso_Small.jpg

Calypso_Small.jpg

190 ms

Circus1.jpg

Circus1.jpg

191 ms

CoutureLab_4.jpg

CoutureLab_4.jpg

187 ms

EddiBorgo_Small.jpg

EddiBorgo_Small.jpg

188 ms

Etienne21.jpg

Etienne21.jpg

189 ms

figue2.jpg

figue2.jpg

192 ms

Giftlab_Big.jpg

Giftlab_Big.jpg

192 ms

guideboat.jpg

guideboat.jpg

194 ms

LoefflerRandall_2.jpg

LoefflerRandall_2.jpg

192 ms

Mara_Big2.jpg

Mara_Big2.jpg

203 ms

marcfisher_thumbnail.jpg

marcfisher_thumbnail.jpg

195 ms

pam1.jpg

pam1.jpg

193 ms

Reed2.jpg

Reed2.jpg

202 ms

SamEdelman4.jpg

SamEdelman4.jpg

198 ms

Showroom35_Small.jpg

Showroom35_Small.jpg

214 ms

Welden3.jpg

Welden3.jpg

198 ms

logotype.svg

logotype.svg

194 ms

twitter.svg

twitter.svg

199 ms

facebook.svg

facebook.svg

200 ms

google+.svg

google+.svg

202 ms

linkedin.svg

linkedin.svg

203 ms

email.svg

email.svg

204 ms

hovercard.css

hovercard.css

150 ms

services.css

services.css

149 ms

Mara.jpg

Mara.jpg

279 ms

EddiBorgo5.jpg

EddiBorgo5.jpg

143 ms

ReedKrakoff1.jpg

ReedKrakoff1.jpg

170 ms

Calypso5.jpg

Calypso5.jpg

150 ms

marcfisher_homepage.jpg

marcfisher_homepage.jpg

213 ms

SamEdelman7.jpg

SamEdelman7.jpg

243 ms

Circus5.jpg

Circus5.jpg

214 ms

Welden2.jpg

Welden2.jpg

210 ms

collect

collect

58 ms

Univers-Light.woff

Univers-Light.woff

150 ms

DINAlternate-Bold.woff

DINAlternate-Bold.woff

159 ms

BigCaslon-Medium.woff

BigCaslon-Medium.woff

184 ms

collect

collect

55 ms

Accessibility Review

onerockwell.com accessibility score

91

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

[id] attributes on active, focusable elements are not unique

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

List items (<li>) are not contained within <ul> or <ol> parent elements.

Best Practices

onerockwell.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

onerockwell.com SEO score

92

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Onerockwell.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Onerockwell.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

onerockwell.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Onerockwell. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: