6.2 sec in total
660 ms
4.7 sec
851 ms
Visit oneseo.in now to see the best up-to-date ONE SEO content for India and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about oneseo.in
OneSEO is SEO company in Jaipur. SEO company Jaipur, Search Engine Optimization Services Company in Jaipur
Visit oneseo.inWe analyzed Oneseo.in page load time and found that the first response time was 660 ms and then it took 5.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.
oneseo.in performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.4 s
17/100
10%
Value4.7 s
32/100
25%
Value8.8 s
16/100
10%
Value3,190 ms
2/100
30%
Value0.028
100/100
15%
Value12.9 s
13/100
10%
660 ms
1330 ms
79 ms
179 ms
85 ms
Our browser made a total of 83 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 45% of them (37 requests) were addressed to the original Oneseo.in, 10% (8 requests) were made to Cdn-icons-png.flaticon.com and 10% (8 requests) were made to Embed.tawk.to. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.4 sec) belongs to the original domain Oneseo.in.
Page size can be reduced by 168.8 kB (19%)
884.6 kB
715.8 kB
In fact, the total size of Oneseo.in main page is 884.6 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 501.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 101.5 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 23.8 kB, which is 20% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 101.5 kB or 85% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 39.2 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, ONE SEO needs image optimization as it can save up to 39.2 kB or 18% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 24.8 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 3.2 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Oneseo.in has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 32 (44%)
72
40
The browser has sent 72 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of ONE SEO. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 22 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 12 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
oneseo.in
660 ms
oneseo.in
1330 ms
api.js
79 ms
enterprise.js
179 ms
css
85 ms
font-awesome.min.css
78 ms
animate.css
539 ms
owl.carousel.min.css
966 ms
owl.theme.default.min.css
967 ms
bootstrap.min.css
1270 ms
style.css
1117 ms
responsive.css
1086 ms
js
177 ms
sweetalert2.all.min.js
67 ms
sweetalert2.min.css
70 ms
jquery.datetimepicker.css
85 ms
jquery.min.js
68 ms
jquery.datetimepicker.full.js
99 ms
jquery.min.js
1395 ms
bootstrap.min.js
1401 ms
owl.carousel.min.js
1211 ms
bootstrap3-typeahead.min.js
99 ms
bootstrap.min.js
73 ms
recaptcha__en.js
33 ms
js
117 ms
analytics.js
241 ms
56763.png
530 ms
logo.png
351 ms
1.png
325 ms
6.png
365 ms
7.png
351 ms
10.png
352 ms
2.png
325 ms
3.png
634 ms
4.png
631 ms
5.png
678 ms
8.png
633 ms
9.png
633 ms
11.png
632 ms
12.png
840 ms
1.jpg
841 ms
hexalogo.png
852 ms
3.jpg
853 ms
4.jpg
879 ms
5.jpg
964 ms
2.jpg
1055 ms
6.png
1063 ms
7.jpg
1066 ms
8.png
1068 ms
9.jpg
1102 ms
facebook.svg
1204 ms
instagram.svg
1273 ms
twitter.svg
1321 ms
1828774.png
346 ms
724927.png
346 ms
8594135.png
676 ms
8610101.png
932 ms
1384055.png
346 ms
1067555.png
351 ms
3014736.png
351 ms
6xK-dSZaM9iE8KbpRA_LJ3z8mH9BOJvgkM0o58a-xzwxUD22FA.ttf
454 ms
6xK-dSZaM9iE8KbpRA_LJ3z8mH9BOJvgkP8o58a-xzwxUD22FA.ttf
389 ms
6xK-dSZaM9iE8KbpRA_LJ3z8mH9BOJvgkKEo58a-xzwxUD22FA.ttf
402 ms
6xK-dSZaM9iE8KbpRA_LJ3z8mH9BOJvgkCEv58a-xzwxUD22FA.ttf
525 ms
6xK-dSZaM9iE8KbpRA_LJ3z8mH9BOJvgkBgv58a-xzwxUD22FA.ttf
355 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
253 ms
default
362 ms
fallback
115 ms
collect
58 ms
collect
56 ms
fallback__ltr.css
24 ms
css
24 ms
js
41 ms
logo_48.png
4 ms
KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxPKTU1Kg.ttf
12 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9AMP6lQ.ttf
15 ms
twk-event-polyfill.js
58 ms
twk-main.js
35 ms
twk-vendor.js
18 ms
twk-chunk-vendors.js
35 ms
twk-chunk-common.js
23 ms
twk-runtime.js
24 ms
twk-app.js
41 ms
oneseo.in accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Form elements do not have associated labels
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Tables and lists
These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).
List items (<li>) are not contained within <ul> or <ol> parent elements.
oneseo.in best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
oneseo.in SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
robots.txt is not valid
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Oneseo.in can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Oneseo.in main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
oneseo.in
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of ONE SEO. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: