Tools & Wizards About Us
onestcom.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 55

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    72% of other websites

  • 85

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 58% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 98

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    92% of websites

onestcom.com

Agence web spécialisé dans la création des sites web vitrines | ONESTCOM

Page Load Speed

3.5 sec in total

First Response

274 ms

Resources Loaded

2 sec

Page Rendered

1.2 sec

onestcom.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to onestcom.com homepage info - get ready to check ONESTCOM best content right away, or after learning these important things about onestcom.com

Agence spécialisé dans le développement des sites web et le webmarketing. Ne payer qu'après la mise en ligne de votre site vitrine…

Visit onestcom.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Onestcom.com page load time and found that the first response time was 274 ms and then it took 3.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

onestcom.com performance score

55

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.2 s

20/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value8.0 s

2/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value7.5 s

26/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value40 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value7.7 s

45/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

onestcom.com

274 ms

onestcom.com

377 ms

css

32 ms

css

51 ms

bootstrap.min.css

334 ms

Our browser made a total of 47 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 87% of them (41 requests) were addressed to the original Onestcom.com, 9% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 4% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1 sec) belongs to the original domain Onestcom.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 528.1 kB (20%)

Content Size

2.6 MB

After Optimization

2.1 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Onestcom.com main page is 2.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.0 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 34.6 kB

  • Original 41.3 kB
  • After minification 23.7 kB
  • After compression 6.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 17.5 kB, which is 42% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 34.6 kB or 84% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-4%

Potential reduce by 87.1 kB

  • Original 2.0 MB
  • After minification 1.9 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. ONESTCOM images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-69%

Potential reduce by 163.8 kB

  • Original 236.6 kB
  • After minification 231.1 kB
  • After compression 72.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 163.8 kB or 69% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-86%

Potential reduce by 242.5 kB

  • Original 283.1 kB
  • After minification 268.8 kB
  • After compression 40.6 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Onestcom.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 242.5 kB or 86% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 15 (38%)

Requests Now

40

After Optimization

25

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 40 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of ONESTCOM. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 9 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 8 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

onestcom.com

onestcom.com

274 ms

onestcom.com

onestcom.com

377 ms

css

css

32 ms

css

css

51 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

334 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

319 ms

slick.css

slick.css

241 ms

slick-theme.css

slick-theme.css

253 ms

animate.min.css

animate.min.css

417 ms

style.css

style.css

425 ms

Onest-favicon.png

Onest-favicon.png

320 ms

Onestcom-logo-SITE.svg

Onestcom-logo-SITE.svg

337 ms

Onestcom-slide1.2_00077.png

Onestcom-slide1.2_00077.png

523 ms

Easyplan-ref.jpg

Easyplan-ref.jpg

719 ms

logo-easy-plan.png

logo-easy-plan.png

419 ms

Aji-pressing.jpg

Aji-pressing.jpg

755 ms

aji-logo.png

aji-logo.png

523 ms

megastonen-ref.png

megastonen-ref.png

590 ms

megastone-logo.svg

megastone-logo.svg

523 ms

jquery-3.3.1.min.js

jquery-3.3.1.min.js

639 ms

popper.min.js

popper.min.js

590 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

599 ms

slick.min.js

slick.min.js

674 ms

jquery.nav.js

jquery.nav.js

676 ms

wow.min.js

wow.min.js

687 ms

imagesloaded.pkgd.min.js

imagesloaded.pkgd.min.js

719 ms

jquery.lazy.min.js

jquery.lazy.min.js

760 ms

main.js

main.js

760 ms

Cr%C3%A9ation_de_site_web.jpg

Cr%C3%A9ation_de_site_web.jpg

858 ms

ref-payant.jpg

ref-payant.jpg

797 ms

Seo-onestcom.jpg

Seo-onestcom.jpg

799 ms

Social_Media.png

Social_Media.png

837 ms

Email-marketing.jpg

Email-marketing.jpg

844 ms

app-mobile-onestcom.png

app-mobile-onestcom.png

926 ms

roland-muntzer.jpg

roland-muntzer.jpg

880 ms

Asmaa-charafane.jpg

Asmaa-charafane.jpg

960 ms

marco-cataldi.jpg

marco-cataldi.jpg

925 ms

philippe-thomas.jpg

philippe-thomas.jpg

930 ms

yamen-rass.png

yamen-rass.png

1030 ms

bg_realis.png

bg_realis.png

524 ms

Onest-cursor.png

Onest-cursor.png

573 ms

Clignote2-footer-DESKT.gif

Clignote2-footer-DESKT.gif

906 ms

iJWZBXyIfDnIV5PNhY1KTN7Z-Yh-B4iFV0Uz.woff

iJWZBXyIfDnIV5PNhY1KTN7Z-Yh-B4iFV0Uz.woff

16 ms

iJWZBXyIfDnIV5PNhY1KTN7Z-Yh-NYiFV0Uz.woff

iJWZBXyIfDnIV5PNhY1KTN7Z-Yh-NYiFV0Uz.woff

33 ms

iJWZBXyIfDnIV5PNhY1KTN7Z-Yh-4I-FV0Uz.woff

iJWZBXyIfDnIV5PNhY1KTN7Z-Yh-4I-FV0Uz.woff

45 ms

w8gdH283Tvk__Lua32TysjIfp8uJ.woff

w8gdH283Tvk__Lua32TysjIfp8uJ.woff

46 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

493 ms

Accessibility Review

onestcom.com accessibility score

85

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

onestcom.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

onestcom.com SEO score

98

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    FR

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Onestcom.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that French is used on the page, and it does not match the claimed English language. Our system also found out that Onestcom.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

onestcom.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of ONESTCOM. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: