Tools & Wizards About Us
onfail.ru screenshot

Report Summary

  • 0

    Performance

  • 0

    Accessibility

  • 0

    Best Practices

  • 0

    SEO

onfail.ru

Free Drivers

Page Load Speed

2.8 sec in total

First Response

896 ms

Resources Loaded

1.7 sec

Page Rendered

149 ms

onfail.ru screenshot

About Website

Welcome to onfail.ru homepage info - get ready to check Onfail best content right away, or after learning these important things about onfail.ru

Free drivers

Visit onfail.ru

Key Findings

We analyzed Onfail.ru page load time and found that the first response time was 896 ms and then it took 1.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

onfail.ru performance score

0

Network Requests Diagram

onfail.ru

896 ms

bootstrap.min.css

39 ms

bootstrap-theme.min.css

57 ms

style.css

329 ms

jquery.min.js

59 ms

Our browser made a total of 10 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 20% of them (2 requests) were addressed to the original Onfail.ru, 40% (4 requests) were made to Maxcdn.bootstrapcdn.com and 10% (1 request) were made to Ajax.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (896 ms) belongs to the original domain Onfail.ru.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 166.6 kB (67%)

Content Size

248.5 kB

After Optimization

81.9 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Onfail.ru main page is 248.5 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 20% of websites need less resources to load. CSS take 148.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-70%

Potential reduce by 13.9 kB

  • Original 20.1 kB
  • After minification 17.1 kB
  • After compression 6.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 2.9 kB, which is 15% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 13.9 kB or 70% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 750 B

  • Original 43.5 kB
  • After minification 42.8 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Onfail images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-73%

Potential reduce by 27.1 kB

  • Original 36.9 kB
  • After minification 36.9 kB
  • After compression 9.8 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 27.1 kB or 73% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 124.9 kB

  • Original 148.1 kB
  • After minification 147.1 kB
  • After compression 23.2 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Onfail.ru needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 124.9 kB or 84% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

7

After Optimization

7

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 7 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Onfail. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Network Requests Diagram

onfail.ru

onfail.ru

896 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

39 ms

bootstrap-theme.min.css

bootstrap-theme.min.css

57 ms

style.css

style.css

329 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

59 ms

jquery-2.1.1.min.js

jquery-2.1.1.min.js

34 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

4 ms

631 ms

glyphicons-halflings-regular.woff

glyphicons-halflings-regular.woff

8 ms

hit

hit

261 ms

SEO Factors

onfail.ru SEO score

0

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Onfail.ru can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Onfail.ru main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

onfail.ru

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Onfail. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: