7.9 sec in total
2.3 sec
4.1 sec
1.5 sec
Visit onfaqua.com now to see the best up-to-date Onfaqua content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about onfaqua.com
优游30秒彩绿盾小优全优游国际注册国企业征信系优游30秒彩,优游国际注册,优游台湾快乐8登陆官网,优游1.0平台统是经央行企业征信备案并通过国家发改委出具信用修复层把关为客户提供质量优异的农
Visit onfaqua.comWe analyzed Onfaqua.com page load time and found that the first response time was 2.3 sec and then it took 5.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.
onfaqua.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.8 s
26/100
10%
Value11.9 s
0/100
25%
Value7.4 s
28/100
10%
Value1,110 ms
23/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value11.1 s
20/100
10%
2281 ms
272 ms
34 ms
201 ms
216 ms
Our browser made a total of 58 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 0% of them (0 request) were addressed to the original Onfaqua.com, 31% (18 requests) were made to Static.parastorage.com and 5% (3 requests) were made to Onf.com.tw. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.3 sec) relates to the external source Onf.com.tw.
Page size can be reduced by 778.9 kB (75%)
1.0 MB
257.1 kB
In fact, the total size of Onfaqua.com main page is 1.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 914.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 767.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 767.2 kB or 84% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 0 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Onfaqua images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 11.7 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 11.7 kB or 18% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 7 (16%)
45
38
The browser has sent 45 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Onfaqua. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 8 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.onf.com.tw
2281 ms
bt
272 ms
minified.js
34 ms
fetch.umd.js
201 ms
bolt-custom-elements.min.js
216 ms
requirejs.min.js
215 ms
bolt-performance
241 ms
dynamicmodel
11 ms
wixcode-worker.js
144 ms
wix-perf-measure.bundle.min.js
134 ms
siteTags.bundle.min.js
133 ms
flatnano%20stand(for%20phone)%20(1).jpg
786 ms
staticCss.min.css
113 ms
%E5%85%89%E6%99%AF_web.jpg
823 ms
Flat%20nano%20stand_%20logo_white.png
715 ms
FLAT%20NANO%20STAND%20%E6%A1%8C%E4%B8%8A%E5%9E%8B%E6%A4%8D%E7%89%A9%E5%9F%B9%E8%82%B2%E7%87%88%E5%85%B7-11.png
823 ms
flat-nano-stand_-web.jpg
735 ms
logo-13.png
897 ms
66d9b9_91686cb09fcf4a41b670a9f2f8754486~mv2.jpg
939 ms
66d9b9_9ff0a6f4589c491b92a6edb0089c2bc3~mv2.jpg
1127 ms
66d9b9_9a8e95ddd053449dbd97cd4debab3135~mv2.jpg
1013 ms
66d9b9_e92df7704c914669bcdfa01f338a4a73~mv2.jpg
954 ms
66d9b9_44aa20cfee624d049a4a61053365994c~mv2.jpg
959 ms
66d9b9_1d367a5d63fa415c8fefd9a57dc968ea~mv2.jpg
1076 ms
66d9b9_668c55ca68824b4bbe33eca9b624a586~mv2.jpg
1028 ms
66d9b9_c280af0d9043400eab4bb86229ca044c~mv2.jpg
1134 ms
66d9b9_e6d530ba13ec4fcca6c4f6f25623198e~mv2.jpg
1048 ms
66d9b9_9a38ba94ff0247999ea3c7ac3966924e~mv2.jpg
1154 ms
66d9b9_9945781871374bddb8e6b22c020fcc17~mv2.jpg
1119 ms
66d9b9_2de8194886d34eb7aea21dadb19c9e92~mv2.jpg
1120 ms
66d9b9_5efde0e3b414419281e1596b71cbfb80~mv2.jpg
1247 ms
66d9b9_1b6b766d64244b8b9598fe5f5a295545~mv2.jpg
1228 ms
66d9b9_ac0b5b2df61f4d0a9c49cf062a0c9e7c~mv2.jpg
1273 ms
66d9b9_c69eeebe757540cfbe00ae7f66350e40~mv2.jpg
1196 ms
66d9b9_4f47e1f5f56448f7923ff6ff71956e2e~mv2.jpg
1366 ms
66d9b9_bcc8049a7efd4b248e369bc9a1694e21~mv2.jpg
1373 ms
66d9b9_13e0052ba5bb425bb0ee685a3749dbc0~mv2.jpg
1373 ms
66d9b9_0c8c57b39c144b049b125b7aab7b36c8~mv2.jpg
1366 ms
66d9b9_37a1f329641f4845a673e897ab63d84b~mv2.jpg
1441 ms
%E5%B0%8F%E6%97%A5%E5%AD%90.png
1413 ms
%E6%A6%AE%E7%8D%B2%E5%A4%A7%E7%8D%8E_en.jpg
1615 ms
%E5%85%A8%E7%90%83%E5%AA%92%E9%AB%94%E7%88%AD%E7%9B%B8%E5%A0%B1%E5%B0%8E_en.jpg
1455 ms
logo.png
1174 ms
%E4%BF%AE%E6%AD%A3%EF%BC%88%E6%BC%B8%E5%B1%A4%E9%BB%91logo%EF%BC%89-01.png
1239 ms
lodash.min.js
100 ms
bt
98 ms
20323430-24f4-4767-9d4d-060d1e89758a.woff
75 ms
94e45703-fbd7-46e5-9fcd-228ae59d6266.woff
76 ms
9ee00678-b6d7-4b4f-8448-70cfa267d36b.woff
77 ms
ae844b11-5158-4caf-90b4-7ace49ac3440.woff
136 ms
d3bbaa1b-d5e3-431f-93a7-9cea63601bb6.woff
196 ms
908c4810-64db-4b46-bb8e-823eb41f68c0.woff
134 ms
u_mYNr_qYP37m7vgvmIYZxa1RVmPjeKy21_GQJaLlJI.woff
197 ms
FD_Udbezj8EHXbdsqLUplxa1RVmPjeKy21_GQJaLlJI.woff
197 ms
61bd362e-7162-46bd-b67e-28f366c4afbe.woff
135 ms
03805817-4611-4dbc-8c65-0f73031c3973.woff
135 ms
80c34ad2-27c2-4d99-90fa-985fd64ab81a.woff
134 ms
e2b9cbeb-fa8e-41cd-8a6a-46044b29ba52.woff
194 ms
onfaqua.com accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
onfaqua.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
onfaqua.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
JA
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Onfaqua.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Japanese is used on the page, and it does not match the claimed English language. Our system also found out that Onfaqua.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
onfaqua.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Onfaqua. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: