3.4 sec in total
126 ms
2.8 sec
443 ms
Visit onlifehealth.com now to see the best up-to-date Onlife Health content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about onlifehealth.com
See how Onlife Health helps health plans engage their members and guide them on The Next Right Thing To Do throughout their health and well-being journey.
Visit onlifehealth.comWe analyzed Onlifehealth.com page load time and found that the first response time was 126 ms and then it took 3.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.
onlifehealth.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value5.5 s
6/100
10%
Value15.8 s
0/100
25%
Value10.9 s
6/100
10%
Value1,930 ms
8/100
30%
Value0.018
100/100
15%
Value21.1 s
1/100
10%
126 ms
245 ms
106 ms
43 ms
41 ms
Our browser made a total of 192 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 79% of them (152 requests) were addressed to the original Onlifehealth.com, 8% (16 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 3% (6 requests) were made to Google.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (586 ms) belongs to the original domain Onlifehealth.com.
Page size can be reduced by 139.0 kB (4%)
3.7 MB
3.6 MB
In fact, the total size of Onlifehealth.com main page is 3.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only a small number of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.4 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 105.6 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 105.6 kB or 80% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 53 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Onlife Health images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 13.4 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 20.0 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Onlifehealth.com has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 147 (86%)
171
24
The browser has sent 171 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Onlife Health. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 118 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 31 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
onlifehealth.com
126 ms
www.onlifehealth.com
245 ms
js
106 ms
slickmap.css
43 ms
wgs2.css
41 ms
wgs3.css
51 ms
style.min.css
44 ms
styles.css
40 ms
style.css
64 ms
grid.min.css
61 ms
helper-parts.min.css
54 ms
main.min.css
76 ms
mediaelementplayer-legacy.min.css
55 ms
wp-mediaelement.min.css
71 ms
style.css
87 ms
font-awesome.min.css
128 ms
style.min.css
102 ms
style.css
98 ms
dripicons.css
131 ms
kiko-all.css
134 ms
font-awesome-5.min.css
132 ms
stylesheet.min.css
181 ms
print.css
135 ms
style_dynamic.css
136 ms
responsive.min.css
140 ms
style_dynamic_responsive.css
139 ms
js_composer.min.css
151 ms
css
53 ms
core-dashboard.min.css
178 ms
swiper.min.css
148 ms
addthis_wordpress_public.min.css
176 ms
frontend-gtag.min.js
251 ms
jquery.min.js
253 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
269 ms
js
99 ms
css2
81 ms
google_cse_v2.js
265 ms
index.js
266 ms
index.js
264 ms
core.min.js
307 ms
main.min.js
308 ms
addthis_widget.js
49 ms
api.js
64 ms
jquery-3.6.4.min.js
46 ms
select2.min.js
78 ms
accordion.min.js
308 ms
menu.min.js
280 ms
wp-polyfill-inert.min.js
277 ms
regenerator-runtime.min.js
274 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
273 ms
dom-ready.min.js
272 ms
hooks.min.js
268 ms
i18n.min.js
268 ms
a11y.min.js
265 ms
autocomplete.min.js
265 ms
controlgroup.min.js
255 ms
checkboxradio.min.js
239 ms
button.min.js
227 ms
datepicker.min.js
228 ms
mouse.min.js
227 ms
resizable.min.js
199 ms
draggable.min.js
198 ms
dialog.min.js
199 ms
droppable.min.js
197 ms
progressbar.min.js
193 ms
selectable.min.js
299 ms
sortable.min.js
296 ms
slider.min.js
283 ms
spinner.min.js
285 ms
tooltip.min.js
259 ms
tabs.min.js
305 ms
effect.min.js
191 ms
effect-blind.min.js
187 ms
effect-bounce.min.js
175 ms
effect-clip.min.js
172 ms
effect-drop.min.js
173 ms
effect-explode.min.js
216 ms
gtm.js
204 ms
fa7p63lshm
240 ms
insight.min.js
241 ms
effect-fade.min.js
214 ms
effect-fold.min.js
214 ms
effect-highlight.min.js
212 ms
effect-pulsate.min.js
212 ms
effect-size.min.js
210 ms
effect-scale.min.js
209 ms
effect-shake.min.js
261 ms
effect-slide.min.js
259 ms
effect-transfer.min.js
257 ms
doubletaptogo.js
257 ms
modernizr.min.js
254 ms
jquery.appear.js
253 ms
hoverIntent.min.js
472 ms
counter.js
472 ms
easypiechart.js
433 ms
mixitup.js
431 ms
jquery.prettyPhoto.js
253 ms
jquery.fitvids.js
429 ms
jquery.flexslider-min.js
466 ms
mediaelement-and-player.min.js
522 ms
mediaelement-migrate.min.js
519 ms
wp-mediaelement.min.js
519 ms
infinitescroll.min.js
518 ms
jquery.waitforimages.js
586 ms
jquery.form.min.js
415 ms
waypoints.min.js
421 ms
jplayer.min.js
418 ms
bootstrap.carousel.js
419 ms
skrollr.js
419 ms
Chart.min.js
472 ms
jquery.easing.1.3.js
469 ms
abstractBaseClass.js
469 ms
jquery.countdown.js
469 ms
cse.js
80 ms
qFda35WCmI96Ajtm83upeyoaX6QPnlo6_PPrOQ.ttf
98 ms
qFda35WCmI96Ajtm83upeyoaX6QPnlo6_PPbMJqP.ttf
277 ms
qFda35WCmI96Ajtm83upeyoaX6QPnlo6zvPbMJqP.ttf
318 ms
qFda35WCmI96Ajtm83upeyoaX6QPnlo6ovPrOQ.ttf
372 ms
qFda35WCmI96Ajtm83upeyoaX6QPnlo6ovPbMJqP.ttf
316 ms
qFda35WCmI96Ajtm83upeyoaX6QPnlo6fPPbMJqP.ttf
368 ms
qFda35WCmI96Ajtm83upeyoaX6QPnlo6_PLbMJqP.ttf
369 ms
qFda35WCmI96Ajtm83upeyoaX6QPnlo6IvTbMJqP.ttf
316 ms
qFda35WCmI96Ajtm83upeyoaX6QPnlo6G_TrOQ.ttf
317 ms
qFda35WCmI96Ajtm83upeyoaX6QPnlo6G_TbMJqP.ttf
370 ms
qFda35WCmI96Ajtm83upeyoaX6QPnlo6fPTbMJqP.ttf
368 ms
qFda35WCmI96Ajtm83upeyoaX6QPnlo6VfTbMJqP.ttf
373 ms
qFdU35WCmI96Ajtm81GgSdXCNs-VMF0vNLADeqqGncY.ttf
371 ms
qFdU35WCmI96Ajtm81GgSdXCNs-VMF0vNLBdeqqGncY.ttf
428 ms
qFdU35WCmI96Ajtm81GgSdXCNs-VMF0vNLADe6qGncY.ttf
426 ms
qFdU35WCmI96Ajtm81GgSdXCNs-VMF0vNLDkfaqGncY.ttf
427 ms
jquery.multiscroll.min.js
426 ms
jquery.justifiedGallery.min.js
533 ms
bigtext.js
533 ms
cse.js
272 ms
jquery.sticky-kit.min.js
496 ms
owl.carousel.min.js
495 ms
typed.js
496 ms
fluidvids.min.js
500 ms
jquery.carouFredSel-6.2.1.min.js
499 ms
lemmon-slider.min.js
496 ms
clarity.js
231 ms
insight_tag_errors.gif
448 ms
jquery.fullPage.min.js
451 ms
jquery.mousewheel.min.js
449 ms
jquery.touchSwipe.min.js
447 ms
jquery.isotope.min.js
450 ms
packery-mode.pkgd.min.js
452 ms
jquery.stretch.js
449 ms
imagesloaded.js
411 ms
rangeslider.min.js
273 ms
jquery.event.move.js
275 ms
jquery.twentytwenty.js
273 ms
swiper.min.js
239 ms
TweenLite.min.js
236 ms
ScrollToPlugin.min.js
235 ms
cse_element__en.js
82 ms
default+en.css
82 ms
shiny.css
82 ms
smoothPageScroll.min.js
183 ms
default_dynamic.js
214 ms
default.min.js
214 ms
comment-reply.min.js
365 ms
js_composer_front.min.js
242 ms
qode-like.min.js
209 ms
index.js
208 ms
icomoon.ttf
237 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
521 ms
Onlife_2C_253x133px.png
184 ms
horn.png
184 ms
Mask-Group-1.jpg
185 ms
Mobile-image.png
185 ms
Member_1_500x500px.png
183 ms
Group-4736.png
119 ms
Explore_MediTransTips.png
120 ms
Explore_BabyYourself.png
119 ms
Explore_eMindful.png
120 ms
Group-4973.png
119 ms
image-4.png
120 ms
image-2.png
119 ms
mobile1.png
120 ms
image.png
119 ms
imagetab.png
146 ms
mobile2.png
146 ms
Onlife_2C.png
146 ms
25_WHP_Wellness_Promotion_3-years_RGB-1-jpg.webp
188 ms
HiTrust_r2.png
145 ms
recaptcha__en.js
237 ms
async-ads.js
214 ms
clear.png
191 ms
pd.js
127 ms
analytics
233 ms
c.gif
31 ms
onlifehealth.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
onlifehealth.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
onlifehealth.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Onlifehealth.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Onlifehealth.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
onlifehealth.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Onlife Health. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: