Tools & Wizards About Us
onlinebrokervergleich.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 90

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    91% of other websites

  • 63

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 28% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 83

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    46% of websites

onlinebrokervergleich.com

onlinebrokervergleich.com - This website is for sale! - onlinebrokervergleich Resources and Information.

Page Load Speed

2.6 sec in total

First Response

297 ms

Resources Loaded

1.8 sec

Page Rendered

453 ms

onlinebrokervergleich.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to onlinebrokervergleich.com homepage info - get ready to check Onlinebrokervergleich best content right away, or after learning these important things about onlinebrokervergleich.com

This website is for sale! onlinebrokervergleich.com is your first and best source for all of the information you’re looking for. From general topics to more of what you would expect to find here, onli...

Visit onlinebrokervergleich.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Onlinebrokervergleich.com page load time and found that the first response time was 297 ms and then it took 2.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

onlinebrokervergleich.com performance score

90

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value0.8 s

100/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value0.8 s

100/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value1.8 s

100/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value200 ms

89/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.223

56/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value3.0 s

96/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

onlinebrokervergleich.com

297 ms

www.onlinebrokervergleich.com

330 ms

main.css

100 ms

scheme.css

197 ms

p594781623.gif

106 ms

Our browser made a total of 36 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 75% of them (27 requests) were addressed to the original Onlinebrokervergleich.com, 8% (3 requests) were made to Media.avapartner.com and 6% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (545 ms) relates to the external source Etoro-cdn.etorostatic.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 59.1 kB (52%)

Content Size

114.1 kB

After Optimization

55.0 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Onlinebrokervergleich.com main page is 114.1 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 15% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 46.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-73%

Potential reduce by 18.8 kB

  • Original 25.7 kB
  • After minification 23.4 kB
  • After compression 6.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 18.8 kB or 73% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-7%

Potential reduce by 2.1 kB

  • Original 31.1 kB
  • After minification 29.0 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Onlinebrokervergleich images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-63%

Potential reduce by 29.1 kB

  • Original 46.3 kB
  • After minification 46.3 kB
  • After compression 17.1 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 29.1 kB or 63% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 9.0 kB

  • Original 11.0 kB
  • After minification 6.2 kB
  • After compression 2.0 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Onlinebrokervergleich.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 9.0 kB or 82% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 9 (28%)

Requests Now

32

After Optimization

23

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 32 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Onlinebrokervergleich. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

onlinebrokervergleich.com

onlinebrokervergleich.com

297 ms

www.onlinebrokervergleich.com

www.onlinebrokervergleich.com

330 ms

main.css

main.css

100 ms

scheme.css

scheme.css

197 ms

p594781623.gif

p594781623.gif

106 ms

55 ms

B1920_A15295_TGet.aspx

B1920_A15295_TGet.aspx

192 ms

ga.js

ga.js

8 ms

p189352476.gif

p189352476.gif

96 ms

p563921784.gif

p563921784.gif

114 ms

bg.gif

bg.gif

101 ms

header.jpg

header.jpg

99 ms

nav.gif

nav.gif

187 ms

nav-link.gif

nav-link.gif

197 ms

cols.gif

cols.gif

199 ms

content-title.gif

content-title.gif

198 ms

perex.gif

perex.gif

199 ms

igmarkets_logo.png

igmarkets_logo.png

200 ms

avafx%20logo%20160x70.GIF

avafx%20logo%20160x70.GIF

280 ms

admiralmarkets_logo.png

admiralmarkets_logo.png

296 ms

activetrades_logo.png

activetrades_logo.png

295 ms

dukascopy%20logo.png

dukascopy%20logo.png

295 ms

easyforex%20logo.gif

easyforex%20logo.gif

296 ms

section-title.gif

section-title.gif

296 ms

btn-more.gif

btn-more.gif

370 ms

sections-bottom.gif

sections-bottom.gif

389 ms

aside-title.gif

aside-title.gif

390 ms

aside-box.jpg

aside-box.jpg

390 ms

ico-list.gif

ico-list.gif

390 ms

aside-title-02.gif

aside-title-02.gif

391 ms

cols-bottom.gif

cols-bottom.gif

463 ms

footer.gif

footer.gif

487 ms

__utm.gif

__utm.gif

12 ms

aw.aspx

aw.aspx

259 ms

115x40_logo.gif

115x40_logo.gif

545 ms

print.css

print.css

105 ms

Accessibility Review

onlinebrokervergleich.com accessibility score

63

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

onlinebrokervergleich.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

High

Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools

SEO Factors

onlinebrokervergleich.com SEO score

83

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Page is blocked from indexing

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document doesn't use legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Onlinebrokervergleich.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Onlinebrokervergleich.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

onlinebrokervergleich.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Onlinebrokervergleich. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: