Report Summary

  • 0

    Performance

  • 0

    Accessibility

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    36% of websites

  • 55

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    20% of websites

Page Load Speed

609 ms in total

First Response

112 ms

Resources Loaded

381 ms

Page Rendered

116 ms

onlinedebate.co.uk screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Onlinedebate content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about onlinedebate.co.uk

Visit onlinedebate.co.uk

Key Findings

We analyzed Onlinedebate.co.uk page load time and found that the first response time was 112 ms and then it took 497 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is an excellent result, as only 5% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

onlinedebate.co.uk performance score

0

Network Requests Diagram

onlinedebate.co.uk

112 ms

generic_csscomponent.css

138 ms

87ae207201c55b84c5270851159260e1.1

99 ms

ipg-bg-shadow-1013.jpg

79 ms

ipg-head-logo.gif

35 ms

Our browser made a total of 10 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 10% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Onlinedebate.co.uk, 60% (6 requests) were made to Images.ipage.com and 30% (3 requests) were made to Ipage.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (138 ms) relates to the external source Ipage.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 85.6 kB (65%)

Content Size

132.7 kB

After Optimization

47.1 kB

In fact, the total size of Onlinedebate.co.uk main page is 132.7 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only 10% of websites need less resources to load. CSS take 81.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-70%

Potential reduce by 4.3 kB

  • Original 6.2 kB
  • After minification 6.2 kB
  • After compression 1.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 4.3 kB or 70% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-6%

Potential reduce by 1.7 kB

  • Original 31.4 kB
  • After minification 29.7 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Onlinedebate images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-85%

Potential reduce by 11.3 kB

  • Original 13.3 kB
  • After minification 6.9 kB
  • After compression 2.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 11.3 kB or 85% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 68.2 kB

  • Original 81.8 kB
  • After minification 67.7 kB
  • After compression 13.6 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Onlinedebate.co.uk needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 68.2 kB or 83% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

9

After Optimization

9

The browser has sent 9 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Onlinedebate. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Best Practices

onlinedebate.co.uk best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

SEO Factors

onlinedebate.co.uk SEO score

55

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Document doesn't have a <title> element

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    US-ASCII

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Onlinedebate.co.uk can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else) and no language is claimed in <html> or <meta> tags either. Our system also found out that Onlinedebate.co.uk main page’s claimed encoding is us-ascii. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Onlinedebate. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: