1.9 sec in total
356 ms
1.3 sec
197 ms
Click here to check amazing Onlinedebate content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about onlinedebate.net
This is a debate community for all ages, skill levels and topics.
Visit onlinedebate.netWe analyzed Onlinedebate.net page load time and found that the first response time was 356 ms and then it took 1.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 30% of websites can load faster.
onlinedebate.net performance score
356 ms
253 ms
281 ms
280 ms
260 ms
Our browser made a total of 76 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 74% of them (56 requests) were addressed to the original Onlinedebate.net, 11% (8 requests) were made to Google.com and 4% (3 requests) were made to Bible.logos.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (602 ms) belongs to the original domain Onlinedebate.net.
Page size can be reduced by 295.8 kB (58%)
508.9 kB
213.1 kB
In fact, the total size of Onlinedebate.net main page is 508.9 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 245.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 36.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 6.2 kB, which is 13% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 36.2 kB or 78% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 13.1 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Onlinedebate needs image optimization as it can save up to 13.1 kB or 24% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 113.8 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 113.8 kB or 46% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 132.6 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Onlinedebate.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 132.6 kB or 82% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 49 (66%)
74
25
The browser has sent 74 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Onlinedebate. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 12 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 11 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
onlinedebate.net
356 ms
tapatalkdetect.js
253 ms
vbulletin-core.js
281 ms
main-rollup.css
280 ms
vbulletin_lightbox.js
260 ms
additional.css
260 ms
css.php
423 ms
poll.css
281 ms
postbit.css
283 ms
lightbox.css
285 ms
adv_portal.css
307 ms
css.php
602 ms
vbulletin_md5.js
324 ms
referencetagging.js
424 ms
yuiloader-dom-event.js
102 ms
connection-min.js
75 ms
pageBG.gif
31 ms
btn_subscribeCC_LG.gif
62 ms
x-click-but04.gif
69 ms
loginBoxInput.gif
54 ms
loginButton.gif
53 ms
logo.jpg
62 ms
searchButton.gif
53 ms
navbit-home.png
60 ms
collapse_40b.png
52 ms
email.png
71 ms
lastpost-right.png
69 ms
poll_posticon.gif
78 ms
paperclip.png
72 ms
cron.php
211 ms
pixel.gif
62 ms
headerBoxBG_left.jpg
87 ms
navBG.gif
84 ms
navLeft_left.gif
87 ms
navRight_left.gif
86 ms
navSplit.gif
94 ms
navBG_hover.gif
105 ms
contentTopBG.gif
111 ms
contentTopLeft.gif
114 ms
contentTopRight.gif
114 ms
iconWelcome.gif
124 ms
iconSearchBox.gif
136 ms
searchInput.gif
139 ms
contentBottomBG.gif
142 ms
contentLeft.gif
141 ms
contentRight.gif
157 ms
contentTL.gif
191 ms
contentTR.gif
191 ms
contentBL.gif
188 ms
contentBR.gif
189 ms
bcBG.gif
192 ms
bcLeft.gif
205 ms
bcRight.gif
206 ms
newbtn_middle.png
251 ms
rating-trans-15_5.png
251 ms
ReferenceTagging.css
189 ms
ReferenceData.aspx
262 ms
cse.js
77 ms
jsapi
34 ms
default+en.css
3 ms
default.css
33 ms
default+en.I.js
14 ms
default.css
17 ms
vglnk.js
39 ms
async-ads.js
88 ms
google_custom_search_watermark.gif
32 ms
footerBG.gif
37 ms
footerLeft.gif
37 ms
footerRight.gif
35 ms
footerTopLeft_left.gif
37 ms
footerTopRight_left.gif
37 ms
small-logo.png
17 ms
search_box_icon.png
17 ms
clear.png
21 ms
pixel.gif
8 ms
pixel.gif
18 ms
onlinedebate.net SEO score
EN
EN
ISO-8859-1
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Onlinedebate.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Onlinedebate.net main page’s claimed encoding is iso-8859-1. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.
onlinedebate.net
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Onlinedebate. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: