Tools & Wizards About Us
onlinewebmarks.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 18

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    34% of other websites

  • 85

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 58% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 89

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    66% of websites

onlinewebmarks.com

Internet Driven SEO System for Submitting Business Content

Page Load Speed

3.9 sec in total

First Response

1.1 sec

Resources Loaded

2.5 sec

Page Rendered

313 ms

onlinewebmarks.com screenshot

About Website

Visit onlinewebmarks.com now to see the best up-to-date Onlinewebmarks content for India and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about onlinewebmarks.com

Provide ways to process and submit your website URL on business directories to create backlinks and increase your product, brand and service offered awareness

Visit onlinewebmarks.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Onlinewebmarks.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1.1 sec and then it took 2.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

onlinewebmarks.com performance score

18

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.7 s

12/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value6.6 s

8/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value32.2 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value50,400 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.013

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value68.8 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.onlinewebmarks.com

1110 ms

styles.css

127 ms

layout.css

119 ms

style.css

134 ms

skin_sky_blue.css

144 ms

Our browser made a total of 68 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 34% of them (23 requests) were addressed to the original Onlinewebmarks.com, 15% (10 requests) were made to S.wordpress.com and 10% (7 requests) were made to Googleads.g.doubleclick.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.1 sec) belongs to the original domain Onlinewebmarks.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 142.8 kB (50%)

Content Size

286.0 kB

After Optimization

143.2 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Onlinewebmarks.com main page is 286.0 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 86.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-85%

Potential reduce by 73.5 kB

  • Original 86.0 kB
  • After minification 80.7 kB
  • After compression 12.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 73.5 kB or 85% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-8%

Potential reduce by 6.3 kB

  • Original 76.2 kB
  • After minification 69.9 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Onlinewebmarks images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-37%

Potential reduce by 29.7 kB

  • Original 79.2 kB
  • After minification 76.9 kB
  • After compression 49.5 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 29.7 kB or 37% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-75%

Potential reduce by 33.2 kB

  • Original 44.5 kB
  • After minification 37.1 kB
  • After compression 11.3 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Onlinewebmarks.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 33.2 kB or 75% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 33 (50%)

Requests Now

66

After Optimization

33

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 66 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Onlinewebmarks. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 27 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 8 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

www.onlinewebmarks.com

www.onlinewebmarks.com

1110 ms

styles.css

styles.css

127 ms

layout.css

layout.css

119 ms

style.css

style.css

134 ms

skin_sky_blue.css

skin_sky_blue.css

144 ms

print.css

print.css

140 ms

theme-my-login.css

theme-my-login.css

201 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

33 ms

comment-reply.min.js

comment-reply.min.js

214 ms

show_ads.js

show_ads.js

10 ms

widgets.js

widgets.js

6 ms

plusone.js

plusone.js

94 ms

brand

brand

23 ms

hoverIntent.min.js

hoverIntent.min.js

214 ms

superfish.js

superfish.js

216 ms

printPreview.js

printPreview.js

210 ms

htmlEditor.js

htmlEditor.js

210 ms

jquery.tools.min.js

jquery.tools.min.js

356 ms

jquery.elastic.js

jquery.elastic.js

274 ms

jquery.form.min.js

jquery.form.min.js

357 ms

www.onlinewebmarks.com

www.onlinewebmarks.com

361 ms

brand

brand

46 ms

css

css

23 ms

zrt_lookup.html

zrt_lookup.html

30 ms

show_ads_impl.js

show_ads_impl.js

47 ms

http%3A%2F%2Fwww.exportcave.com

http%3A%2F%2Fwww.exportcave.com

226 ms

logo.png

logo.png

121 ms

http%3A%2F%2Fthegossipsworld.com%2F2016%2F02%2F29%2Fcheryl-cole-meets-with-liam-payne%2F

http%3A%2F%2Fthegossipsworld.com%2F2016%2F02%2F29%2Fcheryl-cole-meets-with-liam-payne%2F

115 ms

http%3A%2F%2Fwww.jrlaw.org%2Fcontact-us%2F

http%3A%2F%2Fwww.jrlaw.org%2Fcontact-us%2F

140 ms

http%3A%2F%2Fmadhavwebhosting.com%2Fseo-company-in-delhi-ncr

http%3A%2F%2Fmadhavwebhosting.com%2Fseo-company-in-delhi-ncr

116 ms

http%3A%2F%2Fthegossipsworld.com%2F2016%2F02%2F29%2Flady-gaga-urged-by-sony%2F

http%3A%2F%2Fthegossipsworld.com%2F2016%2F02%2F29%2Flady-gaga-urged-by-sony%2F

117 ms

http%3A%2F%2Fsofanhap.net%2Fsan-pham%2Fsofa%2Fsofa-phong-khach.html

http%3A%2F%2Fsofanhap.net%2Fsan-pham%2Fsofa%2Fsofa-phong-khach.html

223 ms

http%3A%2F%2Fthegossipsworld.com%2F2016%2F02%2F29%2Fleonardo-dicaprio-received-an-oscar%2F

http%3A%2F%2Fthegossipsworld.com%2F2016%2F02%2F29%2Fleonardo-dicaprio-received-an-oscar%2F

117 ms

http%3A%2F%2Fwww.dvdfab.cn%2Fpasskey-for-blu-ray.htm

http%3A%2F%2Fwww.dvdfab.cn%2Fpasskey-for-blu-ray.htm

221 ms

http%3A%2F%2Fmahashivaratri2016.com%2F

http%3A%2F%2Fmahashivaratri2016.com%2F

222 ms

http%3A%2F%2Fwww.idcgaragedoor.com

http%3A%2F%2Fwww.idcgaragedoor.com

266 ms

ads

ads

180 ms

osd.js

osd.js

65 ms

ads

ads

285 ms

ads

ads

228 ms

bg_content.gif

bg_content.gif

112 ms

ads

ads

238 ms

ads

ads

188 ms

ads

ads

274 ms

cb=gapi.loaded_0

cb=gapi.loaded_0

78 ms

print.css

print.css

107 ms

abg.js

abg.js

110 ms

vote-buttons-small.png

vote-buttons-small.png

97 ms

google_custom_search_watermark.gif

google_custom_search_watermark.gif

119 ms

ga.js

ga.js

108 ms

button.831500944bc3eb7ea5276ccdc3f71d2e.js

button.831500944bc3eb7ea5276ccdc3f71d2e.js

98 ms

cb=gapi.loaded_1

cb=gapi.loaded_1

57 ms

fastbutton

fastbutton

135 ms

vote-buttons.png

vote-buttons.png

91 ms

tinyicons.png

tinyicons.png

91 ms

menuDropdown_999.gif

menuDropdown_999.gif

104 ms

like.php

like.php

189 ms

postmessageRelay

postmessageRelay

85 ms

__utm.gif

__utm.gif

61 ms

tweet_button.6a78875565a912489e9aef879c881358.en.html

tweet_button.6a78875565a912489e9aef879c881358.en.html

20 ms

cb=gapi.loaded_0

cb=gapi.loaded_0

25 ms

cb=gapi.loaded_1

cb=gapi.loaded_1

25 ms

api.js

api.js

42 ms

core:rpc:shindig.random:shindig.sha1.js

core:rpc:shindig.random:shindig.sha1.js

69 ms

2536007149-postmessagerelay.js

2536007149-postmessagerelay.js

56 ms

vpc6VNjRPXV.js

vpc6VNjRPXV.js

142 ms

LVx-xkvaJ0b.png

LVx-xkvaJ0b.png

157 ms

jot

jot

99 ms

Accessibility Review

onlinewebmarks.com accessibility score

85

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

onlinewebmarks.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

onlinewebmarks.com SEO score

89

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Onlinewebmarks.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Onlinewebmarks.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

onlinewebmarks.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Onlinewebmarks. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: