1.8 sec in total
143 ms
1.3 sec
380 ms
Welcome to onsiteview.com homepage info - get ready to check Onsite View best content right away, or after learning these important things about onsiteview.com
OnsiteView provides robust 4K live streaming and time-lapse cameras for enhanced project monitoring and productivity. Real-time surveillance, and monitoring.
Visit onsiteview.comWe analyzed Onsiteview.com page load time and found that the first response time was 143 ms and then it took 1.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.
onsiteview.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value8.8 s
0/100
10%
Value20.4 s
0/100
25%
Value13.8 s
1/100
10%
Value2,370 ms
5/100
30%
Value0.266
46/100
15%
Value25.1 s
0/100
10%
143 ms
92 ms
116 ms
117 ms
132 ms
Our browser made a total of 66 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 47% of them (31 requests) were addressed to the original Onsiteview.com, 30% (20 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 6% (4 requests) were made to Use.fontawesome.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (455 ms) belongs to the original domain Onsiteview.com.
Page size can be reduced by 1.4 MB (47%)
2.9 MB
1.5 MB
In fact, the total size of Onsiteview.com main page is 2.9 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 1.3 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 63.4 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 63.4 kB or 82% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 51.2 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Onsite View images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 417.0 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 417.0 kB or 70% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 849.5 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Onsiteview.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 849.5 kB or 86% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 27 (69%)
39
12
The browser has sent 39 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Onsite View. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 22 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
onsiteview.com
143 ms
gtm.js
92 ms
js
116 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
117 ms
style.min.css
132 ms
style.css
455 ms
style.min.css
131 ms
css
62 ms
all.css
57 ms
dashicons.min.css
123 ms
v4-shims.css
84 ms
jquery.js
136 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
123 ms
imagesloaded.pkgd.min.js
132 ms
jquery.throttle.debounce.min.js
132 ms
imagesloaded.min.js
149 ms
masonry.pkgd.min.js
140 ms
public.js
149 ms
responsive_preview.js
139 ms
api.js
61 ms
es6-promise.auto.min.js
144 ms
recaptcha.js
149 ms
api.js
104 ms
js
104 ms
custom.unified.js
162 ms
frontend-bundle.min.js
149 ms
common.js
152 ms
wp-embed.min.js
154 ms
swap.js
16 ms
swap.js
42 ms
ptz-osv-clear.png
79 ms
logo-main-new-white.png
80 ms
logo-main-new-white.png
77 ms
4kstatic-osv.jpg
79 ms
ptz-osv.jpg
79 ms
4kptz-osv.jpg
148 ms
onsiteview-solar.jpg
148 ms
bigclients.png
251 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVQ.woff
251 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4gaVQ.woff
269 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4gaVQ.woff
269 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4gaVQ.woff
269 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgshZ1x4gaVQ.woff
269 ms
fa-solid-900.woff
78 ms
fa-regular-400.woff
148 ms
160939712
204 ms
S6u9w4BMUTPHh6UVSwiPHw.woff
249 ms
S6u9w4BMUTPHh50XSwiPHw.woff
249 ms
S6uyw4BMUTPHjx4wWA.woff
276 ms
S6u9w4BMUTPHh7USSwiPHw.woff
274 ms
S6u8w4BMUTPHh30AXC-s.woff
273 ms
modules.ttf
128 ms
iJWZBXyIfDnIV5PNhY1KTN7Z-Yh-NYiFV0Uz.woff
215 ms
iJWZBXyIfDnIV5PNhY1KTN7Z-Yh-B4iFV0Uz.woff
215 ms
iJWZBXyIfDnIV5PNhY1KTN7Z-Yh-WYiFV0Uz.woff
215 ms
iJWZBXyIfDnIV5PNhY1KTN7Z-Yh-4I-FV0Uz.woff
216 ms
iJWZBXyIfDnIV5PNhY1KTN7Z-Yh-ro-FV0Uz.woff
217 ms
memQYaGs126MiZpBA-UFUIcVXSCEkx2cmqvXlWq8tWZ0Pw86hd0Rk8ZkWVAexg.woff
218 ms
memQYaGs126MiZpBA-UFUIcVXSCEkx2cmqvXlWq8tWZ0Pw86hd0Rk5hkWVAexg.woff
217 ms
memQYaGs126MiZpBA-UFUIcVXSCEkx2cmqvXlWq8tWZ0Pw86hd0RkxhjWVAexg.woff
217 ms
memQYaGs126MiZpBA-UFUIcVXSCEkx2cmqvXlWq8tWZ0Pw86hd0RkyFjWVAexg.woff
218 ms
memQYaGs126MiZpBA-UFUIcVXSCEkx2cmqvXlWq8tWZ0Pw86hd0Rk0ZjWVAexg.woff
218 ms
mainpage.php
152 ms
background-image.jpg
123 ms
160939712
322 ms
api.js
51 ms
onsiteview.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Form elements do not have associated labels
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
onsiteview.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
onsiteview.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Page is blocked from indexing
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Onsiteview.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Onsiteview.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
onsiteview.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Onsite View. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: