11 sec in total
914 ms
9.5 sec
601 ms
Welcome to ontap.bg homepage info - get ready to check OnTap best content right away, or after learning these important things about ontap.bg
Намери добрата наливна крафт бира в твоя град. Виж крановете с крафт пиво на бирените барове в България - София, Варна, Бургас, Пловдив ... ✅ Крафт бири, каск ейл, IPA, портър, стаут близо до теб.
Visit ontap.bgWe analyzed Ontap.bg page load time and found that the first response time was 914 ms and then it took 10.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 90% of websites can load faster.
ontap.bg performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value5.8 s
4/100
10%
Value7.1 s
6/100
25%
Value5.8 s
49/100
10%
Value650 ms
46/100
30%
Value0.091
92/100
15%
Value9.5 s
30/100
10%
914 ms
88 ms
25 ms
90 ms
58 ms
Our browser made a total of 111 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 88% of them (98 requests) were addressed to the original Ontap.bg, 4% (4 requests) were made to Ajax.googleapis.com and 3% (3 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (4.3 sec) belongs to the original domain Ontap.bg.
Page size can be reduced by 392.3 kB (15%)
2.6 MB
2.2 MB
In fact, the total size of Ontap.bg main page is 2.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 123.9 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 123.9 kB or 87% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 83.0 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. OnTap images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 185.4 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 185.4 kB or 61% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 8 (7%)
110
102
The browser has sent 110 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of OnTap. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 9 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
ontap.bg
914 ms
js
88 ms
jquery-ui.css
25 ms
js
90 ms
analytics.js
58 ms
js
125 ms
jquery.min.js
11 ms
jquery-ui.min.js
22 ms
sdk.js
78 ms
fbds.js
85 ms
logosmall.png
420 ms
menu5.png
391 ms
lightbulb3.png
406 ms
map.png
410 ms
collect
51 ms
sdk.js
43 ms
collect
79 ms
64d1dae951846.jpg
374 ms
65e343853b525.jpg
515 ms
star.png
881 ms
65e343647b0c0.jpg
666 ms
65e2f5a126d06.jpg
532 ms
65c0c9256ce1f.jpg
546 ms
5c66a05e5f874.jpg
980 ms
65e0b86666c77.jpg
1034 ms
5cd3e1a790daa.jpg
1230 ms
64cfe73eec0ef.jpg
1038 ms
65e076365e3c4.jpg
1253 ms
65e071452bb2c.jpg
1947 ms
65d36df322aac.jpg
2101 ms
65e00cf1cf453.jpg
2133 ms
5dd24dc53e66a.jpg
2108 ms
659fa836ad5fb.jpg
2495 ms
5ed49d0322145.jpg
3075 ms
658fc8a25ec31.jpg
2975 ms
64e3721dd559f.jpg
3150 ms
Logo.png
3086 ms
65dda48200f87.jpg
3330 ms
60d04981d8a90.jpg
3325 ms
65dc97cdd07e1.jpg
3335 ms
65ca3db7c40a7.jpg
3208 ms
5da0202a83faa.jpg
3557 ms
5ce1330beda09.jpg
3694 ms
65d36d817b498.jpg
3809 ms
65d34eb82e240.jpg
3728 ms
5f6f2293b5c93.jpg
4079 ms
65d34e98b6dbf.jpg
3769 ms
65d34e886c279.jpg
3754 ms
65d34e7c4b6ff.jpg
3880 ms
631362081b1c3.jpg
3902 ms
64a1cc8f0807c.jpg
3983 ms
65d092ff65115.jpg
3888 ms
65d0883c64569.jpg
3990 ms
ui-bg_highlight-soft_100_eeeeee_1x100.png
4 ms
5f2c29fe1a05d.jpg
4129 ms
5cdd76a327a04.jpg
3996 ms
65659d01b10a4.jpg
3889 ms
6526a6d668771.jpg
4112 ms
5db2a225238b2.jpg
3972 ms
6219329242e48.jpg
4267 ms
6549152c07088.jpg
4095 ms
658d60f6d049d.jpg
3567 ms
65c262cac2551.jpg
4124 ms
65c25d87bb404.jpg
3990 ms
613db7c64dcb9.jpg
3971 ms
65c1212f44d79.jpg
3267 ms
5c6a53f53fca0.jpg
3233 ms
6347f949b9cdb.jpg
3478 ms
65a7cedf8d64a.jpg
3413 ms
65b2c767d65a1.jpg
2970 ms
5de0d65a691fd.jpg
2614 ms
5c655d80a74e7.jpg
2524 ms
5c6a52e1def87.jpg
2492 ms
601bae8fd763a.jpg
2976 ms
65ad33cef0068.jpg
2991 ms
5e4fd34946362.jpg
2777 ms
65a13e13897c9.jpg
2914 ms
6589509880740.jpg
2910 ms
5c667c9792109.jpg
2812 ms
5c5ae03c03f98.png
2656 ms
5c4dc35fa209d.png
3593 ms
60d03d87bfc29.jpg
2896 ms
6596b3f74bb90.jpg
2744 ms
6063473fea7d1.jpg
2725 ms
627e622fdfbfa.jpg
2534 ms
627121c3ef213.jpg
2658 ms
627121772e80a.jpg
3002 ms
627121284d81f.jpg
2742 ms
627120bd610a1.jpg
2912 ms
5ec8c42ab7018.jpg
2833 ms
5cfdfc9a05de1.jpg
3812 ms
5c965a77b0561.jpg
2660 ms
5c54457a3332b.png
3475 ms
5c44840fba73e.jpg
2779 ms
5cec2e92beff1.jpg
2891 ms
5cec26bf3e17f.jpg
2877 ms
5dce9df5833f1.jpg
2605 ms
5c7f74cd40471.jpg
2513 ms
5c66a79fe4184.jpg
2683 ms
5e4d1fe877c5b.jpg
2401 ms
5c9533926e2d1.jpg
2502 ms
5c973d7d28988.jpg
2764 ms
602780ca82f7e.jpg
2835 ms
5c4f72008d48f.png
2521 ms
5c66a5b88e287.jpg
2671 ms
5c8a1ee2544bf.jpg
2590 ms
5c83f7bbb4bb9.jpg
2642 ms
5e4c4caceac32.jpg
2794 ms
5c65b505417f9.jpg
2928 ms
5c65b427e31ec.jpg
2534 ms
5c65b3d10a52a.jpg
2568 ms
ontap.bg accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
ontap.bg best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
ontap.bg SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
BG
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Ontap.bg can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it does not match the claimed Bulgarian language. Our system also found out that Ontap.bg main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
ontap.bg
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of OnTap. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: