Tools & Wizards About Us
ontaponline.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 8

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    22% of other websites

  • 86

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 61% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 90

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    68% of websites

ontaponline.com

ontaponline.com

Page Load Speed

3.4 sec in total

First Response

1.3 sec

Resources Loaded

1.9 sec

Page Rendered

239 ms

ontaponline.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Ontaponline content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about ontaponline.com

D.C.'s Lifestyle & Entertainment Source

Visit ontaponline.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Ontaponline.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1.3 sec and then it took 2.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

ontaponline.com performance score

8

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.3 s

19/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value13.3 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value6.6 s

38/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value3,550 ms

1/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.551

13/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value23.6 s

1/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

districtfray.com

1346 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

21 ms

style.min.css

39 ms

foobox.free.min.css

36 ms

bs.css

33 ms

Our browser made a total of 61 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 0% of them (0 request) were addressed to the original Ontaponline.com, 3% (2 requests) were made to Pro.fontawesome.com and 2% (1 request) were made to Cdn.jsdelivr.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.3 sec) relates to the external source Districtfray.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 166.3 kB (10%)

Content Size

1.7 MB

After Optimization

1.5 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Ontaponline.com main page is 1.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 115.2 kB

  • Original 139.7 kB
  • After minification 123.0 kB
  • After compression 24.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 16.7 kB, which is 12% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 115.2 kB or 82% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-4%

Potential reduce by 46.2 kB

  • Original 1.1 MB
  • After minification 1.1 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Ontaponline images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 3.6 kB

  • Original 294.6 kB
  • After minification 294.6 kB
  • After compression 290.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 1.3 kB

  • Original 143.4 kB
  • After minification 143.1 kB
  • After compression 142.1 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Ontaponline.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 48 (81%)

Requests Now

59

After Optimization

11

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 59 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Ontaponline. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 33 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 17 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

districtfray.com

districtfray.com

1346 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

wp-emoji-release.min.js

21 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

39 ms

foobox.free.min.css

foobox.free.min.css

36 ms

bs.css

bs.css

33 ms

flat-ui.css

flat-ui.css

31 ms

zocial.css

zocial.css

51 ms

ppcore.min.css

ppcore.min.css

42 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

49 ms

chosen.min.css

chosen.min.css

47 ms

style.css

style.css

65 ms

style.css

style.css

50 ms

wpp.css

wpp.css

53 ms

issuem-leaky-paywall.css

issuem-leaky-paywall.css

60 ms

leaky-paywall-coupons.css

leaky-paywall-coupons.css

60 ms

favorites.css

favorites.css

69 ms

slick.css

slick.css

31 ms

main.css

main.css

95 ms

all.css

all.css

80 ms

init-2.min.js

init-2.min.js

43 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

71 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

72 ms

zxcvbn-async.min.js

zxcvbn-async.min.js

73 ms

bootstrap-filestyle.js

bootstrap-filestyle.js

74 ms

jcarousel.js

jcarousel.js

87 ms

sweetalert2.min.js

sweetalert2.min.js

89 ms

chosen.jquery.min.js

chosen.jquery.min.js

128 ms

analytics-talk-content-tracking.js

analytics-talk-content-tracking.js

88 ms

wpp.min.js

wpp.min.js

87 ms

leaky-paywall-registration-redirect.js

leaky-paywall-registration-redirect.js

131 ms

favorites.min.js

favorites.min.js

129 ms

jquery.image_zoom.min.js

jquery.image_zoom.min.js

129 ms

image_zoom-init.js

image_zoom-init.js

129 ms

foobox.free.min.js

foobox.free.min.js

133 ms

modernizr.custom.min.js

modernizr.custom.min.js

130 ms

main.js

main.js

160 ms

email-decode.min.js

email-decode.min.js

127 ms

core.min.js

core.min.js

209 ms

datepicker.min.js

datepicker.min.js

207 ms

40 ms

OneSignalSDK.js

OneSignalSDK.js

68 ms

regenerator-runtime.min.js

regenerator-runtime.min.js

206 ms

wp-polyfill.min.js

wp-polyfill.min.js

194 ms

hooks.min.js

hooks.min.js

184 ms

i18n.min.js

i18n.min.js

193 ms

password-strength-meter.min.js

password-strength-meter.min.js

192 ms

frontend.js

frontend.js

189 ms

script.js

script.js

187 ms

ajax-load-more.min.js

ajax-load-more.min.js

180 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

212 ms

7706.js

7706.js

187 ms

DistrictFraylogo-01.png

DistrictFraylogo-01.png

184 ms

DFM_Mobile_logo.png

DFM_Mobile_logo.png

183 ms

434771660_961393205349018_5408897422684187281_n-858x492.jpg

434771660_961393205349018_5408897422684187281_n-858x492.jpg

185 ms

DSC08071-858x492.jpg

DSC08071-858x492.jpg

183 ms

DCF-Play-007-858x492.jpg

DCF-Play-007-858x492.jpg

184 ms

Screenshot-2024-05-03-at-12.50.07-PM-796x492.png

Screenshot-2024-05-03-at-12.50.07-PM-796x492.png

186 ms

FRAYLIFE_Membership_Marketing-Graphics_Sidebar-ad-300x300-1-300x300.jpg

FRAYLIFE_Membership_Marketing-Graphics_Sidebar-ad-300x300-1-300x300.jpg

189 ms

DSC00456.jpg

DSC00456.jpg

189 ms

Screenshot-2023-12-16-at-10.07.18%E2%80%AFAM.png

Screenshot-2023-12-16-at-10.07.18%E2%80%AFAM.png

187 ms

fa-brands-400.woff

fa-brands-400.woff

58 ms

Accessibility Review

ontaponline.com accessibility score

86

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

[id] attributes on active, focusable elements are not unique

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

ontaponline.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

ontaponline.com SEO score

90

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Ontaponline.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Ontaponline.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

ontaponline.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Ontaponline. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: