Tools & Wizards About Us
ontheedge.ru screenshot

Report Summary

  • 29

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    49% of other websites

  • 82

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 52% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 92

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    74% of websites

ontheedge.ru

"На Грани": проект Дмитрия Пелина об активной жизни

Page Load Speed

4.4 sec in total

First Response

396 ms

Resources Loaded

3.3 sec

Page Rendered

633 ms

ontheedge.ru screenshot

About Website

Visit ontheedge.ru now to see the best up-to-date Ontheedge content for Russia and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about ontheedge.ru

Блог об заработке в интернете, активном отдыхе, экстриме, приключениях, самостоятельных путешествиях.

Visit ontheedge.ru

Key Findings

We analyzed Ontheedge.ru page load time and found that the first response time was 396 ms and then it took 4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

ontheedge.ru performance score

29

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.8 s

55/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value2.9 s

80/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value11.7 s

4/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value3,930 ms

1/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.471

18/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value21.9 s

1/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

ontheedge.ru

396 ms

ontheedge.ru

729 ms

social-likes_flat.css

204 ms

93dd57665ca9ca04c98539461a26f0eb.css

33 ms

adsbygoogle.js

164 ms

Our browser made a total of 63 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 75% of them (47 requests) were addressed to the original Ontheedge.ru, 8% (5 requests) were made to Travelpayouts.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Cdn.jsdelivr.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.9 sec) belongs to the original domain Ontheedge.ru.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 122.2 kB (11%)

Content Size

1.1 MB

After Optimization

1.0 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Ontheedge.ru main page is 1.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 697.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-71%

Potential reduce by 101.9 kB

  • Original 144.6 kB
  • After minification 144.4 kB
  • After compression 42.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 101.9 kB or 71% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 4.8 kB

  • Original 697.4 kB
  • After minification 692.6 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Ontheedge images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 650 B

  • Original 208.3 kB
  • After minification 208.3 kB
  • After compression 207.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-19%

Potential reduce by 14.9 kB

  • Original 79.9 kB
  • After minification 79.9 kB
  • After compression 65.0 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Ontheedge.ru needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 14.9 kB or 19% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 20 (34%)

Requests Now

59

After Optimization

39

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 59 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Ontheedge. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 18 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

ontheedge.ru

ontheedge.ru

396 ms

ontheedge.ru

ontheedge.ru

729 ms

social-likes_flat.css

social-likes_flat.css

204 ms

93dd57665ca9ca04c98539461a26f0eb.css

93dd57665ca9ca04c98539461a26f0eb.css

33 ms

adsbygoogle.js

adsbygoogle.js

164 ms

408 ms

context.js

context.js

1006 ms

c32ffbd75aeffe09cf4bd27eb8c027e8.js

c32ffbd75aeffe09cf4bd27eb8c027e8.js

498 ms

jquery-f949e9ad598d04e8c9395a45ec67bbee.js

jquery-f949e9ad598d04e8c9395a45ec67bbee.js

15 ms

jquery.scrollTo-2780a98cad5149dee88524d95b027baf.js

jquery.scrollTo-2780a98cad5149dee88524d95b027baf.js

39 ms

superfish-489df267d7ad535443092a1c1baa94d6.js

superfish-489df267d7ad535443092a1c1baa94d6.js

21 ms

jquery.mobilemenu-c61632e53ef568c68eedbdf347d02ffe.js

jquery.mobilemenu-c61632e53ef568c68eedbdf347d02ffe.js

28 ms

custom-11f453d1b0fc8d9cddf55fcf8f8d369c.js

custom-11f453d1b0fc8d9cddf55fcf8f8d369c.js

52 ms

social-likes.min.js

social-likes.min.js

6 ms

frontend.min-6.2.3.js

frontend.min-6.2.3.js

26 ms

lazyload.min.js

lazyload.min.js

19 ms

fbevents.js

fbevents.js

204 ms

header_menu_border.png

header_menu_border.png

179 ms

timthumb.php

timthumb.php

792 ms

timthumb.php

timthumb.php

825 ms

timthumb.php

timthumb.php

825 ms

timthumb.php

timthumb.php

782 ms

timthumb.php

timthumb.php

928 ms

timthumb.php

timthumb.php

389 ms

timthumb.php

timthumb.php

549 ms

pagin_arrow.png

pagin_arrow.png

561 ms

fb.png

fb.png

580 ms

vk.png

vk.png

607 ms

tw.png

tw.png

608 ms

gp.png

gp.png

620 ms

yt.png

yt.png

638 ms

in.png

in.png

719 ms

category_sidebar.png

category_sidebar.png

737 ms

footer_bg.png

footer_bg.png

749 ms

yoda.png

yoda.png

760 ms

up.png

up.png

775 ms

watch.js

watch.js

35 ms

ga-575b5480531da4d14e7453e2016fe0bc.js

ga-575b5480531da4d14e7453e2016fe0bc.js

633 ms

42852.woff

42852.woff

1201 ms

search_m.png

search_m.png

586 ms

headerbg.jpg

headerbg.jpg

586 ms

na_grani.png

na_grani.png

1004 ms

img_1.png

img_1.png

998 ms

img_2.png

img_2.png

1048 ms

img_3.png

img_3.png

1032 ms

img_4.png

img_4.png

1119 ms

img_5.png

img_5.png

1432 ms

menu_m.png

menu_m.png

1021 ms

search_head.png

search_head.png

1468 ms

logo.png

logo.png

1467 ms

banner_parashut.jpg

banner_parashut.jpg

1736 ms

banner_shar.jpg

banner_shar.jpg

1138 ms

logo_f.png

logo_f.png

1569 ms

logo_f2.jpg

logo_f2.jpg

1577 ms

logo_f3.jpg

logo_f3.jpg

1865 ms

c32ffbd75aeffe09cf4bd27eb8c027e8.js

c32ffbd75aeffe09cf4bd27eb8c027e8.js

292 ms

styles.css

styles.css

132 ms

sp.js

sp.js

17 ms

whereami

whereami

324 ms

logos.css

logos.css

400 ms

j.gif

j.gif

116 ms

collect

collect

27 ms

js

js

63 ms

Accessibility Review

ontheedge.ru accessibility score

82

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[role] values are not valid

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

ontheedge.ru best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

ontheedge.ru SEO score

92

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    RU

  • Language Claimed

    RU

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Ontheedge.ru can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Russian is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Ontheedge.ru main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

ontheedge.ru

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Ontheedge. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: