Tools & Wizards About Us
onthemarklocalmarketing.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 47

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    65% of other websites

  • 96

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 88% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 93

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    83% of websites

onthemarklocalmarketing.com

Brantford Marketing Agency | Internet Advertising Company

Page Load Speed

7.4 sec in total

First Response

248 ms

Resources Loaded

6.8 sec

Page Rendered

353 ms

onthemarklocalmarketing.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to onthemarklocalmarketing.com homepage info - get ready to check Onthemarklocal Marketing best content right away, or after learning these important things about onthemarklocalmarketing.com

Leading internet marketing company in Brantford run by an experienced online consultant. Unique approach from other firms. One of the original local marketing agencies.

Visit onthemarklocalmarketing.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Onthemarklocalmarketing.com page load time and found that the first response time was 248 ms and then it took 7.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 85% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

onthemarklocalmarketing.com performance score

47

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.5 s

15/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value10.3 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value8.3 s

19/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value240 ms

85/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value10.0 s

26/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

onthemarklocalmarketing.com

248 ms

onthemarklocalmarketing.com

1576 ms

js

87 ms

style-gutenberg-frontend-style.css

427 ms

main.min.css

343 ms

Our browser made a total of 103 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 84% of them (87 requests) were addressed to the original Onthemarklocalmarketing.com, 11% (11 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 3% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.4 sec) belongs to the original domain Onthemarklocalmarketing.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 285.7 kB (27%)

Content Size

1.1 MB

After Optimization

789.5 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Onthemarklocalmarketing.com main page is 1.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 463.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 195.8 kB

  • Original 239.5 kB
  • After minification 232.1 kB
  • After compression 43.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 195.8 kB or 82% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 48 B

  • Original 65.7 kB
  • After minification 65.7 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Onthemarklocal Marketing images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-17%

Potential reduce by 76.7 kB

  • Original 463.9 kB
  • After minification 463.9 kB
  • After compression 387.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 76.7 kB or 17% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-4%

Potential reduce by 13.2 kB

  • Original 306.2 kB
  • After minification 306.2 kB
  • After compression 293.0 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Onthemarklocalmarketing.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 83 (94%)

Requests Now

88

After Optimization

5

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 88 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Onthemarklocal Marketing. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 48 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 37 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

onthemarklocalmarketing.com

onthemarklocalmarketing.com

248 ms

onthemarklocalmarketing.com

onthemarklocalmarketing.com

1576 ms

js

js

87 ms

style-gutenberg-frontend-style.css

style-gutenberg-frontend-style.css

427 ms

main.min.css

main.min.css

343 ms

buttons.min.css

buttons.min.css

320 ms

dashicons.min.css

dashicons.min.css

447 ms

mediaelementplayer-legacy.min.css

mediaelementplayer-legacy.min.css

350 ms

wp-mediaelement.min.css

wp-mediaelement.min.css

500 ms

media-views.min.css

media-views.min.css

630 ms

imgareaselect.css

imgareaselect.css

637 ms

fontawesome.css

fontawesome.css

977 ms

review_widget_form.css

review_widget_form.css

718 ms

review_widget_display.css

review_widget_display.css

756 ms

htbbootstrap.css

htbbootstrap.css

811 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

940 ms

animation.css

animation.css

947 ms

htmega-keyframes.css

htmega-keyframes.css

1026 ms

elementor-icons.min.css

elementor-icons.min.css

1066 ms

frontend.min.css

frontend.min.css

1121 ms

swiper.min.css

swiper.min.css

1250 ms

e-swiper.min.css

e-swiper.min.css

1255 ms

post-813.css

post-813.css

1285 ms

animations.min.css

animations.min.css

1338 ms

post-1675.css

post-1675.css

1384 ms

css

css

60 ms

fontawesome.min.css

fontawesome.min.css

1431 ms

solid.min.css

solid.min.css

1558 ms

regular.min.css

regular.min.css

1564 ms

frontend-gtag.min.js

frontend-gtag.min.js

1593 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

1751 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

1692 ms

workflow.bundle.js

workflow.bundle.js

1762 ms

utils.min.js

utils.min.js

1869 ms

moxie.min.js

moxie.min.js

1978 ms

plupload.min.js

plupload.min.js

1901 ms

widget-image.min.css

widget-image.min.css

1974 ms

widget-heading.min.css

widget-heading.min.css

1978 ms

widget-text-editor.min.css

widget-text-editor.min.css

1978 ms

widget-spacer.min.css

widget-spacer.min.css

2003 ms

widget-icon-list.min.css

widget-icon-list.min.css

1907 ms

slick.min.css

slick.min.css

1969 ms

htmega-widgets.css

htmega-widgets.css

2186 ms

widget-toggle.min.css

widget-toggle.min.css

1966 ms

widget-icon-box.min.css

widget-icon-box.min.css

1931 ms

frontend.js

frontend.js

2001 ms

frontend.min.js

frontend.min.js

1954 ms

progressbar.js

progressbar.js

1972 ms

css

css

18 ms

css

css

22 ms

toggles.js

toggles.js

1974 ms

counter.js

counter.js

1937 ms

tabs.js

tabs.js

1996 ms

countdown.js

countdown.js

1904 ms

lottie-player.js

lottie-player.js

2119 ms

underscore.min.js

underscore.min.js

1918 ms

shortcode.min.js

shortcode.min.js

1974 ms

backbone.min.js

backbone.min.js

1935 ms

wp-util.min.js

wp-util.min.js

1996 ms

wp-backbone.min.js

wp-backbone.min.js

1904 ms

media-models.min.js

media-models.min.js

1972 ms

wp-plupload.min.js

wp-plupload.min.js

2025 ms

core.min.js

core.min.js

1973 ms

mouse.min.js

mouse.min.js

1991 ms

sortable.min.js

sortable.min.js

1999 ms

mediaelement-and-player.min.js

mediaelement-and-player.min.js

2015 ms

mediaelement-migrate.min.js

mediaelement-migrate.min.js

1960 ms

wp-mediaelement.min.js

wp-mediaelement.min.js

2025 ms

api-request.min.js

api-request.min.js

1927 ms

dom-ready.min.js

dom-ready.min.js

1934 ms

hooks.min.js

hooks.min.js

2087 ms

i18n.min.js

i18n.min.js

2015 ms

a11y.min.js

a11y.min.js

2027 ms

container_HZcKBzuA.js

container_HZcKBzuA.js

85 ms

clipboard.min.js

clipboard.min.js

1869 ms

media-views.min.js

media-views.min.js

2054 ms

S6uyw4BMUTPHjx4wWA.woff

S6uyw4BMUTPHjx4wWA.woff

24 ms

S6u9w4BMUTPHh7USSwiPHw.woff

S6u9w4BMUTPHh7USSwiPHw.woff

33 ms

S6u8w4BMUTPHh30AXC-s.woff

S6u8w4BMUTPHh30AXC-s.woff

42 ms

S6u9w4BMUTPHh6UVSwiPHw.woff

S6u9w4BMUTPHh6UVSwiPHw.woff

62 ms

S6u9w4BMUTPHh50XSwiPHw.woff

S6u9w4BMUTPHh50XSwiPHw.woff

63 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVQ.woff

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVQ.woff

62 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjr0B4gaVQ.woff

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjr0B4gaVQ.woff

63 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4gaVQ.woff

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4gaVQ.woff

61 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4gaVQ.woff

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4gaVQ.woff

52 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4gaVQ.woff

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4gaVQ.woff

62 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgshZ1x4gaVQ.woff

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgshZ1x4gaVQ.woff

63 ms

media-editor.min.js

media-editor.min.js

2101 ms

media-audiovideo.min.js

media-audiovideo.min.js

2124 ms

review_widget_form.js

review_widget_form.js

2053 ms

popper.min.js

popper.min.js

2021 ms

htbbootstrap.js

htbbootstrap.js

2144 ms

waypoints.js

waypoints.js

2104 ms

slick.min.js

slick.min.js

2132 ms

htmega-widgets-active.js

htmega-widgets-active.js

2054 ms

webpack.runtime.min.js

webpack.runtime.min.js

1972 ms

frontend-modules.min.js

frontend-modules.min.js

2271 ms

frontend.min.js

frontend.min.js

2364 ms

fa-solid-900.woff

fa-solid-900.woff

2409 ms

fa-regular-400.woff

fa-regular-400.woff

2231 ms

letters-only-close-border-300x41.png

letters-only-close-border-300x41.png

2053 ms

rr-min-1-982x1024.jpg

rr-min-1-982x1024.jpg

2227 ms

impressed-curious-man-presses-lips-advertises-product-points-with-both-index-fingers-3-e1713802248407.webp

impressed-curious-man-presses-lips-advertises-product-points-with-both-index-fingers-3-e1713802248407.webp

2247 ms

Accessibility Review

onthemarklocalmarketing.com accessibility score

96

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

onthemarklocalmarketing.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

onthemarklocalmarketing.com SEO score

93

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Onthemarklocalmarketing.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Onthemarklocalmarketing.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

onthemarklocalmarketing.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Onthemarklocal Marketing. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: