Tools & Wizards About Us
ontimestaffing.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 45

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    64% of other websites

  • 95

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 86% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    94% of websites

ontimestaffing.com

Light Industrial Staffing with On Time Staffing | Warehouse Staffing

Page Load Speed

1.4 sec in total

First Response

103 ms

Resources Loaded

941 ms

Page Rendered

313 ms

ontimestaffing.com screenshot

About Website

Visit ontimestaffing.com now to see the best up-to-date On Time Staffing content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about ontimestaffing.com

On Time Staffing supports light industrial staffing and warehouse staffing while talent acquisition experts maintain a strong pool of candidates.

Visit ontimestaffing.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Ontimestaffing.com page load time and found that the first response time was 103 ms and then it took 1.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 25% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

ontimestaffing.com performance score

45

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.7 s

61/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.4 s

68/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.6 s

71/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,670 ms

11/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.198

62/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value10.5 s

24/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.ontimestaffing.com

103 ms

_required.min.css

53 ms

bootstrap.min.css

74 ms

sr-base.css

77 ms

module_99912186753_SR_Nav_Dropdown_01.min.css

71 ms

Our browser made a total of 55 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 80% of them (44 requests) were addressed to the original Ontimestaffing.com, 2% (1 request) were made to Googletagmanager.com and 2% (1 request) were made to Code.jquery.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (445 ms) belongs to the original domain Ontimestaffing.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 112.8 kB (31%)

Content Size

358.1 kB

After Optimization

245.4 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Ontimestaffing.com main page is 358.1 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 154.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 84.8 kB

  • Original 101.9 kB
  • After minification 94.1 kB
  • After compression 17.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 84.8 kB or 83% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 406 B

  • Original 154.7 kB
  • After minification 154.3 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. On Time Staffing images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-11%

Potential reduce by 7.3 kB

  • Original 64.8 kB
  • After minification 64.8 kB
  • After compression 57.5 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 7.3 kB or 11% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-55%

Potential reduce by 20.2 kB

  • Original 36.7 kB
  • After minification 22.8 kB
  • After compression 16.5 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Ontimestaffing.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 20.2 kB or 55% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 28 (56%)

Requests Now

50

After Optimization

22

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 50 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of On Time Staffing. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 19 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 11 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

www.ontimestaffing.com

www.ontimestaffing.com

103 ms

_required.min.css

_required.min.css

53 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

74 ms

sr-base.css

sr-base.css

77 ms

module_99912186753_SR_Nav_Dropdown_01.min.css

module_99912186753_SR_Nav_Dropdown_01.min.css

71 ms

module_99912154979_SR_Hero_03.min.css

module_99912154979_SR_Hero_03.min.css

296 ms

module_99905606448_SR_Stats_01.min.css

module_99905606448_SR_Stats_01.min.css

292 ms

module_99905550229_SR_Offer_Bar_06.min.css

module_99905550229_SR_Offer_Bar_06.min.css

245 ms

module_99905306462_SR_Cards_Grid_02.min.css

module_99905306462_SR_Cards_Grid_02.min.css

309 ms

module_99905415239_SR_Clients_Carousel_01.min.css

module_99905415239_SR_Clients_Carousel_01.min.css

112 ms

module_108616038144_TW_Testimonial_Slider.min.css

module_108616038144_TW_Testimonial_Slider.min.css

294 ms

module_99905449525_SR_Footer_Min_01.min.css

module_99905449525_SR_Footer_Min_01.min.css

141 ms

js

js

99 ms

jquery-3.6.0.min.js

jquery-3.6.0.min.js

84 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

77 ms

embed.js

embed.js

90 ms

project.js

project.js

175 ms

element.js

element.js

103 ms

project.js

project.js

209 ms

headroom.min.js

headroom.min.js

239 ms

module_99905606448_SR_Stats_01.min.js

module_99905606448_SR_Stats_01.min.js

264 ms

slick.min.js

slick.min.js

272 ms

2800395.js

2800395.js

445 ms

index.js

index.js

444 ms

interaction.min.js

interaction.min.js

443 ms

cf6928a937.js

cf6928a937.js

146 ms

ontime-staffing-logo.svg

ontime-staffing-logo.svg

123 ms

Group_207797-2.jpg

Group_207797-2.jpg

125 ms

hero-img.png

hero-img.png

127 ms

Group%207737.svg

Group%207737.svg

125 ms

Group%207738.svg

Group%207738.svg

120 ms

Group%207739.svg

Group%207739.svg

126 ms

cta-bg-clock-hero.webp

cta-bg-clock-hero.webp

130 ms

Group-7720.png

Group-7720.png

128 ms

Group-7719.png

Group-7719.png

130 ms

Group-7723.png

Group-7723.png

130 ms

crown-bakeries-logo.png

crown-bakeries-logo.png

131 ms

GreenYard.png

GreenYard.png

131 ms

Groupe%20Seb.png

Groupe%20Seb.png

132 ms

Neovia-logo.png

Neovia-logo.png

131 ms

Nfi.png

Nfi.png

133 ms

Ready_Pac_Logo.png

Ready_Pac_Logo.png

132 ms

Taylor_Farms_logo.png

Taylor_Farms_logo.png

133 ms

USUI.png

USUI.png

133 ms

Second%20section%20of%20the%20home%20page.jpg

Second%20section%20of%20the%20home%20page.jpg

145 ms

Group_207797-2.jpg

Group_207797-2.jpg

143 ms

700.woff

700.woff

65 ms

600.woff

600.woff

104 ms

regular.woff

regular.woff

35 ms

300.woff

300.woff

78 ms

2800395.js

2800395.js

109 ms

web-interactives-embed.js

web-interactives-embed.js

96 ms

collectedforms.js

collectedforms.js

86 ms

banner.js

banner.js

121 ms

fb.js

fb.js

85 ms

Accessibility Review

ontimestaffing.com accessibility score

95

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

ontimestaffing.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

ontimestaffing.com SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Ontimestaffing.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Ontimestaffing.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

ontimestaffing.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of On Time Staffing. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: