Tools & Wizards About Us
opemed.net screenshot

Report Summary

  • 45

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    64% of other websites

  • 80

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 49% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 86

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    60% of websites

opemed.net

Opemed | Ceiling Hoists for Disabled Patient Handling

Page Load Speed

4.9 sec in total

First Response

405 ms

Resources Loaded

4.1 sec

Page Rendered

375 ms

opemed.net screenshot

About Website

Welcome to opemed.net homepage info - get ready to check Opemed best content for Singapore right away, or after learning these important things about opemed.net

Visit opemed.net

Key Findings

We analyzed Opemed.net page load time and found that the first response time was 405 ms and then it took 4.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

opemed.net performance score

45

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value5.6 s

5/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value12.1 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value11.4 s

5/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value160 ms

94/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.069

96/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value12.2 s

15/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.opemed.net

405 ms

menu-image.css

71 ms

dashicons.min.css

146 ms

magnific_popup.css

208 ms

animate.css

219 ms

Our browser made a total of 47 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 87% of them (41 requests) were addressed to the original Opemed.net, 9% (4 requests) were made to Use.fontawesome.com and 2% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.3 sec) belongs to the original domain Opemed.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 195.7 kB (16%)

Content Size

1.2 MB

After Optimization

1.0 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Opemed.net main page is 1.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 741.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-85%

Potential reduce by 188.7 kB

  • Original 222.1 kB
  • After minification 217.7 kB
  • After compression 33.4 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 188.7 kB or 85% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 3.8 kB

  • Original 741.8 kB
  • After minification 738.0 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Opemed images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 2.2 kB

  • Original 164.5 kB
  • After minification 164.5 kB
  • After compression 162.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 1.0 kB

  • Original 103.9 kB
  • After minification 103.7 kB
  • After compression 102.9 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Opemed.net has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 28 (64%)

Requests Now

44

After Optimization

16

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 44 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Opemed. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 15 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 15 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

www.opemed.net

www.opemed.net

405 ms

menu-image.css

menu-image.css

71 ms

dashicons.min.css

dashicons.min.css

146 ms

magnific_popup.css

magnific_popup.css

208 ms

animate.css

animate.css

219 ms

lazyload-shared.css

lazyload-shared.css

277 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

347 ms

css

css

34 ms

all.css

all.css

53 ms

all.css

all.css

76 ms

style.css

style.css

274 ms

v4-shims.css

v4-shims.css

70 ms

et-core-unified-16.min.css

et-core-unified-16.min.css

276 ms

mediaelementplayer-legacy.min.css

mediaelementplayer-legacy.min.css

281 ms

wp-mediaelement.min.css

wp-mediaelement.min.css

282 ms

lazyload-shared.js

lazyload-shared.js

336 ms

lazyload-youtube.js

lazyload-youtube.js

341 ms

lazyload-vimeo.js

lazyload-vimeo.js

472 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

473 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

472 ms

scripts.min.js

scripts.min.js

559 ms

jquery.fitvids.js

jquery.fitvids.js

474 ms

jquery.mobile.js

jquery.mobile.js

475 ms

easypiechart.js

easypiechart.js

1341 ms

salvattore.js

salvattore.js

475 ms

frontend-bundle.min.js

frontend-bundle.min.js

475 ms

common.js

common.js

483 ms

mediaelement-and-player.min.js

mediaelement-and-player.min.js

559 ms

mediaelement-migrate.min.js

mediaelement-migrate.min.js

492 ms

wp-mediaelement.min.js

wp-mediaelement.min.js

495 ms

Opemed-Logo-Astor-Bannerman_3.png

Opemed-Logo-Astor-Bannerman_3.png

622 ms

Ceiling-Hoists.jpg

Ceiling-Hoists.jpg

702 ms

Assisted-Bathing.jpg

Assisted-Bathing.jpg

634 ms

Changing-Tables.jpg

Changing-Tables.jpg

699 ms

Wash-Basins.jpg

Wash-Basins.jpg

699 ms

OT200-IMAGE-with-new-spreader-bar.jpg

OT200-IMAGE-with-new-spreader-bar.jpg

763 ms

Tracking-Image-02-300x300.jpg

Tracking-Image-02-300x300.jpg

707 ms

OT400-Image-01-300x300.jpeg

OT400-Image-01-300x300.jpeg

770 ms

Basin-Hero-Show-Brochure-cropped-scaled-e1632413856422.jpg

Basin-Hero-Show-Brochure-cropped-scaled-e1632413856422.jpg

841 ms

IMG_5866-400x250.png

IMG_5866-400x250.png

773 ms

Crawley-Hospital-CP-02-1-400x250.jpg

Crawley-Hospital-CP-02-1-400x250.jpg

778 ms

PCCPA178-We-Have-a-Winner-400x250.jpg

PCCPA178-We-Have-a-Winner-400x250.jpg

780 ms

ab-group-logos.jpg

ab-group-logos.jpg

712 ms

et-divi-dynamic-tb-41-16-late.css

et-divi-dynamic-tb-41-16-late.css

478 ms

font

font

22 ms

modules.woff

modules.woff

437 ms

fa-brands-400.ttf

fa-brands-400.ttf

36 ms

Accessibility Review

opemed.net accessibility score

80

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

opemed.net best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

opemed.net SEO score

86

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Opemed.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Opemed.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

opemed.net

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Opemed. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: