Tools & Wizards About Us
ophthalmologyweb.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 19

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    36% of other websites

  • 80

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 49% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 75

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    32% of websites

ophthalmologyweb.com

OphthalmologyWeb | The Ultimate Resource for Ophthalmologists

Page Load Speed

1.5 sec in total

First Response

193 ms

Resources Loaded

1.1 sec

Page Rendered

257 ms

ophthalmologyweb.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Ophthalmology Web content for India. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about ophthalmologyweb.com

Find products, read reviews, and learn about the latest technologies and techniques on OphthalmologyWeb

Visit ophthalmologyweb.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Ophthalmologyweb.com page load time and found that the first response time was 193 ms and then it took 1.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 30% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

ophthalmologyweb.com performance score

19

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.2 s

19/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value7.8 s

3/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value6.6 s

37/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value920 ms

30/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.544

13/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value12.2 s

15/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.ophthalmologyweb.com

193 ms

CommonStyleSheet.ashx

77 ms

AllSitesCommonJavaScript.ashx

77 ms

css

121 ms

font-awesome.min.css

63 ms

Our browser made a total of 66 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 27% of them (18 requests) were addressed to the original Ophthalmologyweb.com, 32% (21 requests) were made to Media.ophthalmologyweb.com and 9% (6 requests) were made to Comparenetworks.engine.adglare.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (538 ms) relates to the external source Media.ophthalmologyweb.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 106.7 kB (19%)

Content Size

573.5 kB

After Optimization

466.7 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Ophthalmologyweb.com main page is 573.5 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 374.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-80%

Potential reduce by 48.1 kB

  • Original 60.3 kB
  • After minification 58.6 kB
  • After compression 12.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 48.1 kB or 80% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-5%

Potential reduce by 18.2 kB

  • Original 374.3 kB
  • After minification 356.2 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Ophthalmology Web images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-29%

Potential reduce by 40.5 kB

  • Original 138.8 kB
  • After minification 138.7 kB
  • After compression 98.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 40.5 kB or 29% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 21 (33%)

Requests Now

63

After Optimization

42

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 63 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Ophthalmology Web. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 22 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

www.ophthalmologyweb.com

www.ophthalmologyweb.com

193 ms

CommonStyleSheet.ashx

CommonStyleSheet.ashx

77 ms

AllSitesCommonJavaScript.ashx

AllSitesCommonJavaScript.ashx

77 ms

css

css

121 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

63 ms

BrightcoveExperiences.js

BrightcoveExperiences.js

129 ms

jav_omniture_oweb_236.js

jav_omniture_oweb_236.js

60 ms

mbox.js

mbox.js

121 ms

comparenetworks.engine.adglare.net

comparenetworks.engine.adglare.net

157 ms

index.min.js

index.min.js

184 ms

comparenetworks.engine.adglare.net

comparenetworks.engine.adglare.net

160 ms

comparenetworks.engine.adglare.net

comparenetworks.engine.adglare.net

159 ms

js

js

163 ms

spm.v1.min.js

spm.v1.min.js

59 ms

widgets.js

widgets.js

182 ms

AllSitesCommonFooterJavaScript.ashx

AllSitesCommonFooterJavaScript.ashx

125 ms

CommonJavaScript.ashx

CommonJavaScript.ashx

124 ms

ControlJavaScript.ashx

ControlJavaScript.ashx

124 ms

tracker.js

tracker.js

61 ms

standard

standard

52 ms

27.png

27.png

294 ms

cn_retina.png

cn_retina.png

135 ms

us.gif

us.gif

335 ms

607393-400x300.jpg

607393-400x300.jpg

375 ms

598119-400x300.jpg

598119-400x300.jpg

383 ms

585232-400x300.jpg

585232-400x300.jpg

448 ms

361326-52x39.jpg

361326-52x39.jpg

447 ms

558395-52x39.jpg

558395-52x39.jpg

449 ms

558394-52x39.jpg

558394-52x39.jpg

457 ms

612885-134x100.jpg

612885-134x100.jpg

456 ms

612625-134x100.jpg

612625-134x100.jpg

456 ms

612437-134x100.jpg

612437-134x100.jpg

458 ms

610445-134x100.jpg

610445-134x100.jpg

456 ms

608349-134x100.jpg

608349-134x100.jpg

456 ms

articledefault.png

articledefault.png

510 ms

19843-52x39.jpg

19843-52x39.jpg

523 ms

598119-52x39.jpg

598119-52x39.jpg

508 ms

39099-52x39.jpg

39099-52x39.jpg

493 ms

607393-52x39.jpg

607393-52x39.jpg

495 ms

592673-52x39.jpg

592673-52x39.jpg

512 ms

597797-134x100.jpg

597797-134x100.jpg

538 ms

187168-134x100.jpg

187168-134x100.jpg

535 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

174 ms

HeaderBackground.jpg

HeaderBackground.jpg

169 ms

SubHomeBackground.gif

SubHomeBackground.gif

61 ms

SearchButton.png

SearchButton.png

126 ms

comparenetworks.engine.adglare.net

comparenetworks.engine.adglare.net

39 ms

pv

pv

179 ms

z7NFdQDnbTkabZAIOl9il_O6KJj73e7Ff0GmDuXMQg.ttf

z7NFdQDnbTkabZAIOl9il_O6KJj73e7Ff0GmDuXMQg.ttf

103 ms

z7NFdQDnbTkabZAIOl9il_O6KJj73e7Ff1GhDuXMQg.ttf

z7NFdQDnbTkabZAIOl9il_O6KJj73e7Ff1GhDuXMQg.ttf

170 ms

SubscribeBackground.png

SubscribeBackground.png

158 ms

SubscribeButton.png

SubscribeButton.png

157 ms

FollowButtons.png

FollowButtons.png

91 ms

s66012517821509

s66012517821509

87 ms

FooterBackground.gif

FooterBackground.gif

148 ms

spriteLogo.gif

spriteLogo.gif

148 ms

comparenetworks.engine.adglare.net

comparenetworks.engine.adglare.net

77 ms

comparenetworks.engine.adglare.net

comparenetworks.engine.adglare.net

77 ms

selectedArrow.png

selectedArrow.png

299 ms

widget_iframe.2f70fb173b9000da126c79afe2098f02.html

widget_iframe.2f70fb173b9000da126c79afe2098f02.html

114 ms

collect

collect

58 ms

ChevronOverlay.png

ChevronOverlay.png

180 ms

eg5xm_krtuxe_5748294b.jpg

eg5xm_krtuxe_5748294b.jpg

197 ms

eg5xm_5w89pb_d89076e9.jpg

eg5xm_5w89pb_d89076e9.jpg

194 ms

settings

settings

152 ms

js

js

36 ms

Accessibility Review

ophthalmologyweb.com accessibility score

80

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

ophthalmologyweb.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

ophthalmologyweb.com SEO score

75

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Ophthalmologyweb.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Ophthalmologyweb.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

ophthalmologyweb.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Ophthalmology Web. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: