2.5 sec in total
535 ms
1.6 sec
390 ms
Click here to check amazing OPINATOR content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about opinator.net
Customer Experience Management. Boost response rates in your VoC, NPS, and CX Management programs with highly engaging surveys
Visit opinator.netWe analyzed Opinator.net page load time and found that the first response time was 535 ms and then it took 2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.
opinator.net performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.3 s
39/100
10%
Value10.6 s
0/100
25%
Value7.7 s
24/100
10%
Value3,020 ms
2/100
30%
Value0.294
41/100
15%
Value13.5 s
11/100
10%
535 ms
38 ms
106 ms
204 ms
289 ms
Our browser made a total of 49 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 0% of them (0 request) were addressed to the original Opinator.net, 31% (15 requests) were made to Web.opinator.com and 10% (5 requests) were made to Gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (535 ms) relates to the external source Web.opinator.com.
Page size can be reduced by 215.1 kB (20%)
1.1 MB
847.9 kB
In fact, the total size of Opinator.net main page is 1.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 421.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 197.4 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 197.4 kB or 84% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 7.0 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. OPINATOR images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 10.5 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 146 B
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Opinator.net has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 19 (73%)
26
7
The browser has sent 26 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of OPINATOR. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 16 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
web.opinator.com
535 ms
uc.js
38 ms
c34b6.css
106 ms
b2f55.css
204 ms
e970e.css
289 ms
a5ff7.css
368 ms
1f540.js
367 ms
f5135.js
418 ms
d9036.js
508 ms
38838.js
367 ms
api.js
42 ms
31730.js
378 ms
6db30.js
383 ms
068ff.js
417 ms
gtm.js
66 ms
CX_Banking_OPI_.png
418 ms
insight.min.js
52 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVuEorCGPrc.woff
17 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVuEorCGPrQ.ttf
30 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVtaorCGPrc.woff
46 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVtaorCGPrQ.ttf
60 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvao7CGPrc.woff
57 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvao7CGPrQ.ttf
58 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvaorCGPrc.woff
56 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvaorCGPrQ.ttf
57 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvoorCGPrc.woff
55 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvoorCGPrQ.ttf
60 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVsEpbCGPrc.woff
62 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVsEpbCGPrQ.ttf
61 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVs9pbCGPrc.woff
61 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVs9pbCGPrQ.ttf
61 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVtapbCGPrc.woff
87 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVtapbCGPrQ.ttf
87 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVtzpbCGPrc.woff
88 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVtzpbCGPrQ.ttf
104 ms
modules.ttf
237 ms
insight_tag_errors.gif
129 ms
recaptcha__en.js
39 ms
chica-home-1.png
277 ms
anchor
31 ms
styles__ltr.css
4 ms
recaptcha__en.js
12 ms
YiMnlwYAPK-5JOvV4HgQVh4BjdfeuDlm7M1GgLf3u0w.js
33 ms
webworker.js
64 ms
logo_48.png
21 ms
KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxPKTU1Kg.ttf
7 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9AMP6lQ.ttf
40 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtfBBc9AMP6lQ.ttf
41 ms
recaptcha__en.js
39 ms
opinator.net accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
opinator.net best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
opinator.net SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Opinator.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Opinator.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
opinator.net
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of OPINATOR. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: