3.6 sec in total
298 ms
2.6 sec
677 ms
Welcome to opiniion.com homepage info - get ready to check Opiniion best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about opiniion.com
Measure and manage your residents' experience from the time they tour until they move out. Identify strengths & resolve issues in real time.
Visit opiniion.comWe analyzed Opiniion.com page load time and found that the first response time was 298 ms and then it took 3.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.
opiniion.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.4 s
38/100
10%
Value15.5 s
0/100
25%
Value11.4 s
5/100
10%
Value510 ms
57/100
30%
Value0.043
99/100
15%
Value15.2 s
7/100
10%
298 ms
59 ms
61 ms
32 ms
206 ms
Our browser made a total of 100 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 69% of them (69 requests) were addressed to the original Opiniion.com, 27% (27 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 1% (1 request) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.3 sec) belongs to the original domain Opiniion.com.
Page size can be reduced by 443.1 kB (16%)
2.7 MB
2.3 MB
In fact, the total size of Opiniion.com main page is 2.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.6 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 117.5 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 117.5 kB or 85% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 325.6 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Opiniion needs image optimization as it can save up to 325.6 kB or 13% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 12 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Number of requests can be reduced by 39 (59%)
66
27
The browser has sent 66 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Opiniion. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 19 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 22 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
opiniion.com
298 ms
opiniion.com
59 ms
gtm.js
61 ms
script.js
32 ms
all.min.css
206 ms
font-icons.min.css
167 ms
elementor-icons.min.css
190 ms
frontend.min.css
250 ms
swiper.min.css
217 ms
post-971.css
185 ms
frontend.min.css
424 ms
global.css
394 ms
post-2261.css
351 ms
post-5963.css
374 ms
post-1949.css
370 ms
post-2105.css
399 ms
general.min.css
506 ms
css
57 ms
fontawesome.min.css
558 ms
solid.min.css
547 ms
brands.min.css
465 ms
regular.min.css
549 ms
jquery.min.js
644 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
627 ms
post-2435.css
575 ms
post-2441.css
787 ms
post-2446.css
822 ms
animations.min.css
628 ms
menu.min.js
787 ms
general.min.js
788 ms
jquery.sticky.min.js
787 ms
jquery.smartmenus.min.js
854 ms
imagesloaded.min.js
906 ms
webpack-pro.runtime.min.js
902 ms
webpack.runtime.min.js
948 ms
frontend-modules.min.js
986 ms
hooks.min.js
984 ms
i18n.min.js
907 ms
frontend.min.js
1089 ms
waypoints.min.js
1068 ms
core.min.js
1099 ms
log
414 ms
frontend.min.js
878 ms
elements-handlers.min.js
876 ms
Group-943.svg
460 ms
Group-947.png
592 ms
Rectangle-107.png
643 ms
Opiniion-Reporting-Page.png
621 ms
Cushman-Wakefield-Logo-300x78.png
607 ms
Edward-Rose-Logo-300x127.png
536 ms
Bridge-Property-Management-768x359-1.png
642 ms
logo-dark-1.png
712 ms
CAPREIT_logosmall.png
814 ms
zrs_transparent.png
827 ms
252_1583949771.png
814 ms
RPM-300x235.png
836 ms
Group-963.png
905 ms
Group-964.png
1026 ms
Group-952.png
1132 ms
Group-965-1.png
1164 ms
Group-966.png
1143 ms
unsplash_xbBaOa_dd5I-1.png
1022 ms
%E2%80%9C.png
948 ms
unsplash_0mN84vxigL0.png
1018 ms
unsplash_RtVGS4vGkgM.png
1109 ms
Frame-15.png
1013 ms
pxiEyp8kv8JHgFVrJJfedw.ttf
51 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLGT9Z1xlEA.ttf
73 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLDz8Z1xlEA.ttf
84 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLFj_Z1xlEA.ttf
84 ms
pxiGyp8kv8JHgFVrLPTucHtF.ttf
85 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLEj6Z1xlEA.ttf
128 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLCz7Z1xlEA.ttf
84 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLDD4Z1xlEA.ttf
86 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLBT5Z1xlEA.ttf
85 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Hw5aX8.ttf
87 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtZ6Hw5aX8.ttf
88 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCs16Hw5aX8.ttf
87 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvr6Hw5aX8.ttf
88 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Xw5aX8.ttf
88 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCu173w5aX8.ttf
121 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCuM73w5aX8.ttf
120 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvr73w5aX8.ttf
122 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvC73w5aX8.ttf
122 ms
eicons.woff
1258 ms
fa-brands-400.woff
1146 ms
JTUFjIg1_i6t8kCHKm459Wx7xQYXK0vOoz6jq6R9WXh0ow.ttf
88 ms
JTUFjIg1_i6t8kCHKm459Wx7xQYXK0vOoz6jq5Z9WXh0ow.ttf
88 ms
JTUFjIg1_i6t8kCHKm459Wx7xQYXK0vOoz6jq_p9WXh0ow.ttf
89 ms
JTUFjIg1_i6t8kCHKm459Wx7xQYXK0vOoz6jqyR9WXh0ow.ttf
89 ms
JTUFjIg1_i6t8kCHKm459Wx7xQYXK0vOoz6jq6R8WXh0ow.ttf
90 ms
JTUFjIg1_i6t8kCHKm459Wx7xQYXK0vOoz6jq3p6WXh0ow.ttf
91 ms
JTUFjIg1_i6t8kCHKm459Wx7xQYXK0vOoz6jq0N6WXh0ow.ttf
90 ms
JTUFjIg1_i6t8kCHKm459Wx7xQYXK0vOoz6jqyR6WXh0ow.ttf
91 ms
JTUFjIg1_i6t8kCHKm459Wx7xQYXK0vOoz6jqw16WXh0ow.ttf
91 ms
fa-solid-900.woff
1232 ms
fa-regular-400.woff
1027 ms
612fb45d2b8164b0a1547b2f_perk-01-techplus-x-template-1-1024x717.png
1155 ms
Group-22.png
1130 ms
Opiniion-RCA-2023-1024x1024.png
1266 ms
opiniion.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
opiniion.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
opiniion.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Opiniion.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Opiniion.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
opiniion.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Opiniion. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: