Tools & Wizards About Us
opoint.no screenshot

Report Summary

  • 75

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    83% of other websites

  • 90

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 74% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 93

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    83% of websites

opoint.no

Medieovervåkning, analyse og rådgivning

Page Load Speed

3.1 sec in total

First Response

395 ms

Resources Loaded

1.2 sec

Page Rendered

1.5 sec

opoint.no screenshot

About Website

Visit opoint.no now to see the best up-to-date Opoint content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about opoint.no

Nordens ledende i media intelligence. Vi skaper resultater gjennom omfattende mediedata, ny digital teknologi og dyp innsikt i medier og kommunikasjon.

Visit opoint.no

Key Findings

We analyzed Opoint.no page load time and found that the first response time was 395 ms and then it took 2.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

opoint.no performance score

75

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.2 s

45/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.2 s

44/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value5.6 s

53/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value60 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value3.6 s

91/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

opoint.no

395 ms

infomedia.no

252 ms

uc.js

112 ms

lazyload.min.js

499 ms

wARDj0u

7 ms

Our browser made a total of 5 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 20% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Opoint.no, 40% (2 requests) were made to Infomedia.no and 20% (1 request) were made to Policy.app.cookieinformation.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (499 ms) relates to the external source Infomedia.no.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 689.7 kB (83%)

Content Size

830.0 kB

After Optimization

140.2 kB

  • HTML
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Opoint.no main page is 830.0 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only 10% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 817.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 689.7 kB

  • Original 817.4 kB
  • After minification 797.1 kB
  • After compression 127.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 689.7 kB or 84% of the original size.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 12 B

  • Original 12.6 kB
  • After minification 12.6 kB
  • After compression 12.6 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

2

After Optimization

2

  • JavaScript

The browser has sent 2 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Opoint. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Network Requests Diagram

opoint.no

opoint.no

395 ms

infomedia.no

infomedia.no

252 ms

uc.js

uc.js

112 ms

lazyload.min.js

lazyload.min.js

499 ms

wARDj0u

wARDj0u

7 ms

Accessibility Review

opoint.no accessibility score

90

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

ARIA IDs are not unique

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

opoint.no best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

opoint.no SEO score

93

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    NO

  • Language Claimed

    NB

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Opoint.no can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Norwegian is used on the page, and it does not match the claimed language. Our system also found out that Opoint.no main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

opoint.no

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Opoint. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: