Tools & Wizards About Us
opticalexpressmagazine.co.uk screenshot

Report Summary

  • 29

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    49% of other websites

  • 81

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 51% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 93

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    83% of websites

opticalexpressmagazine.co.uk

Read our Laser Eye Surgery Patient Reviews | Optical Express

Page Load Speed

3.5 sec in total

First Response

308 ms

Resources Loaded

2.9 sec

Page Rendered

293 ms

opticalexpressmagazine.co.uk screenshot

About Website

Welcome to opticalexpressmagazine.co.uk homepage info - get ready to check Optical Express Magazine best content for United Kingdom right away, or after learning these important things about opticalexpressmagazine.co.uk

Laser eye surgery reviews from wonderful patients after choosing to have refractive surgery. Find out how it changed their life | Optical Express

Visit opticalexpressmagazine.co.uk

Key Findings

We analyzed Opticalexpressmagazine.co.uk page load time and found that the first response time was 308 ms and then it took 3.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

opticalexpressmagazine.co.uk performance score

29

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.2 s

19/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.7 s

33/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value9.5 s

12/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,970 ms

8/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.024

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value18.3 s

3/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

opticalexpressmagazine.co.uk

308 ms

opticalexpresschangedmylife.co.uk

415 ms

patient-reviews

605 ms

gtm.js

84 ms

script.js

36 ms

Our browser made a total of 36 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 3% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Opticalexpressmagazine.co.uk, 61% (22 requests) were made to Opticalexpress.co.uk and 11% (4 requests) were made to Google.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (764 ms) relates to the external source Opticalexpress.co.uk.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 711.5 kB (53%)

Content Size

1.4 MB

After Optimization

640.7 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Opticalexpressmagazine.co.uk main page is 1.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 497.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-88%

Potential reduce by 183.8 kB

  • Original 209.8 kB
  • After minification 151.9 kB
  • After compression 26.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 57.9 kB, which is 28% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 183.8 kB or 88% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-86%

Potential reduce by 430.4 kB

  • Original 497.6 kB
  • After minification 67.2 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Optical Express Magazine needs image optimization as it can save up to 430.4 kB or 86% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-10%

Potential reduce by 45.4 kB

  • Original 476.4 kB
  • After minification 476.4 kB
  • After compression 430.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-31%

Potential reduce by 51.9 kB

  • Original 168.5 kB
  • After minification 168.5 kB
  • After compression 116.6 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Opticalexpressmagazine.co.uk needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 51.9 kB or 31% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 13 (52%)

Requests Now

25

After Optimization

12

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 25 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Optical Express Magazine. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 14 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

opticalexpressmagazine.co.uk

opticalexpressmagazine.co.uk

308 ms

opticalexpresschangedmylife.co.uk

opticalexpresschangedmylife.co.uk

415 ms

patient-reviews

patient-reviews

605 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

84 ms

script.js

script.js

36 ms

2fd0f339.5a23ca96.8f645cbc.be3d46dd.c95fbabb.a19d14fd.39955c8c.eb64c235.54a4ea51.css.v202407041

2fd0f339.5a23ca96.8f645cbc.be3d46dd.c95fbabb.a19d14fd.39955c8c.eb64c235.54a4ea51.css.v202407041

657 ms

jquery-3.3.1.min.js

jquery-3.3.1.min.js

494 ms

13639a05.e90e7c15.44d4dc65.18abd51c.fd48138e.a8977e96.js.v202407041

13639a05.e90e7c15.44d4dc65.18abd51c.fd48138e.a8977e96.js.v202407041

171 ms

24ef4140.d4b332d6.js.v202407041

24ef4140.d4b332d6.js.v202407041

552 ms

53 ms

d6009b52.2df6fd21.c1827490.2c8f9d21.d086df8e.js.v202407041

d6009b52.2df6fd21.c1827490.2c8f9d21.d086df8e.js.v202407041

554 ms

simpleParallax.min.js

simpleParallax.min.js

57 ms

c3b18941.f9d56357.9954d74f.4d3b8027.7a003b01.9655bc9e.fe508414.e6a39279.js.v202407041

c3b18941.f9d56357.9954d74f.4d3b8027.7a003b01.9655bc9e.fe508414.e6a39279.js.v202407041

764 ms

masonry.pkgd.min.js

masonry.pkgd.min.js

19 ms

frank_small.png

frank_small.png

365 ms

oliviaalex_patient-reviews_thumbnail.jpg

oliviaalex_patient-reviews_thumbnail.jpg

133 ms

spinner.gif

spinner.gif

190 ms

keyboard-arrow-right.svg

keyboard-arrow-right.svg

129 ms

open-sans-regular.woff

open-sans-regular.woff

226 ms

open-sans-bold.woff

open-sans-bold.woff

227 ms

regular-medium.woff

regular-medium.woff

227 ms

regular-medium.woff

regular-medium.woff

228 ms

regular-semibold.woff

regular-semibold.woff

227 ms

regular-semibold.woff

regular-semibold.woff

228 ms

regular-bold.woff

regular-bold.woff

229 ms

regular-bold.woff

regular-bold.woff

228 ms

spinner.gif

spinner.gif

270 ms

trustpilot-inline-white-1024x121-4-5-stars.png

trustpilot-inline-white-1024x121-4-5-stars.png

134 ms

persistCampaign.php

persistCampaign.php

390 ms

spacer.png

spacer.png

232 ms

cse.js

cse.js

43 ms

cse_element__en.js

cse_element__en.js

32 ms

default+en.css

default+en.css

128 ms

default.css

default.css

130 ms

async-ads.js

async-ads.js

94 ms

branding.png

branding.png

63 ms

Accessibility Review

opticalexpressmagazine.co.uk accessibility score

81

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

opticalexpressmagazine.co.uk best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

opticalexpressmagazine.co.uk SEO score

93

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Opticalexpressmagazine.co.uk can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Opticalexpressmagazine.co.uk main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

opticalexpressmagazine.co.uk

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Optical Express Magazine. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: