Report Summary

  • 55

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    72% of other websites

  • 95

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 86% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 98

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    92% of websites

optikcheck.de

Golf Fernmitgliedschaft PLUS ab 25€/Monat im DGV Golfclub! - Onegolf

Page Load Speed

4 sec in total

First Response

233 ms

Resources Loaded

3.2 sec

Page Rendered

563 ms

optikcheck.de screenshot

About Website

Visit optikcheck.de now to see the best up-to-date Optikcheck content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about optikcheck.de

Golf Fernmitgliedschaft / günstige Golfmitgliedschaft ab nur 25€/Monat ✓100% DGV Golfclub-Mitgliedschaft 2022 ✓ Billig golfen - 0€ Greenfee im Heimatclub!

Visit optikcheck.de

Key Findings

We analyzed Optikcheck.de page load time and found that the first response time was 233 ms and then it took 3.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

optikcheck.de performance score

55

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.7 s

13/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value5.8 s

15/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value7.6 s

25/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value150 ms

95/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.098

90/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value6.6 s

57/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

optikcheck.de

233 ms

onegolf.de

853 ms

css

29 ms

1e5cf.css

405 ms

22883.css

595 ms

Our browser made a total of 44 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 2% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Optikcheck.de, 93% (41 requests) were made to Onegolf.de and 2% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1 sec) relates to the external source Onegolf.de.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 63.9 kB (27%)

Content Size

238.1 kB

After Optimization

174.2 kB

In fact, the total size of Optikcheck.de main page is 238.1 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 20% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 149.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-76%

Potential reduce by 63.7 kB

  • Original 83.4 kB
  • After minification 81.3 kB
  • After compression 19.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 63.7 kB or 76% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 151 B

  • Original 149.8 kB
  • After minification 149.6 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Optikcheck images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 40 B

  • Original 5.0 kB
  • After minification 5.0 kB
  • After compression 5.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 10 (24%)

Requests Now

41

After Optimization

31

The browser has sent 41 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Optikcheck. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

optikcheck.de accessibility score

95

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

List items (<li>) are not contained within <ul> or <ol> parent elements.

Best Practices

optikcheck.de best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

optikcheck.de SEO score

98

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    DE

  • Language Claimed

    DE

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Optikcheck.de can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that German is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Optikcheck.de main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Optikcheck. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: