Tools & Wizards About Us
optimizepresspro.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 46

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    64% of other websites

  • 85

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 58% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 89

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    66% of websites

optimizepresspro.com

Page Load Speed

3.9 sec in total

First Response

276 ms

Resources Loaded

3.3 sec

Page Rendered

302 ms

optimizepresspro.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Optimizepresspro content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about optimizepresspro.com

Buy OptimizePress™ for WordPress and get our bonus product worth $134 for free. Find comparisons, reviews and tutorials here about OP & LeadPages.

Visit optimizepresspro.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Optimizepresspro.com page load time and found that the first response time was 276 ms and then it took 3.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

optimizepresspro.com performance score

46

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.9 s

54/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.1 s

74/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value6.5 s

38/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,060 ms

25/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.265

46/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value8.2 s

40/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

optimizepresspro.com

276 ms

www.optimizepresspro.com

1969 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

158 ms

mediaelementplayer.min.css

17 ms

wp-mediaelement.css

19 ms

Our browser made a total of 73 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 4% of them (3 requests) were addressed to the original Optimizepresspro.com, 53% (39 requests) were made to 2s1poij3kkm304tay14afajj.wpengine.netdna-cdn.com and 12% (9 requests) were made to Apis.google.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2 sec) belongs to the original domain Optimizepresspro.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 471.2 kB (53%)

Content Size

893.9 kB

After Optimization

422.7 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Optimizepresspro.com main page is 893.9 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 322.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 70.5 kB

  • Original 85.7 kB
  • After minification 82.9 kB
  • After compression 15.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 70.5 kB or 82% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-14%

Potential reduce by 45.7 kB

  • Original 322.4 kB
  • After minification 276.7 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Optimizepresspro needs image optimization as it can save up to 45.7 kB or 14% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-65%

Potential reduce by 184.9 kB

  • Original 285.8 kB
  • After minification 272.9 kB
  • After compression 100.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 184.9 kB or 65% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-85%

Potential reduce by 170.1 kB

  • Original 200.0 kB
  • After minification 160.5 kB
  • After compression 29.9 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Optimizepresspro.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 170.1 kB or 85% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 34 (49%)

Requests Now

69

After Optimization

35

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 69 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Optimizepresspro. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 26 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 10 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

optimizepresspro.com

optimizepresspro.com

276 ms

www.optimizepresspro.com

www.optimizepresspro.com

1969 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

wp-emoji-release.min.js

158 ms

mediaelementplayer.min.css

mediaelementplayer.min.css

17 ms

wp-mediaelement.css

wp-mediaelement.css

19 ms

style.css

style.css

19 ms

layout.css

layout.css

17 ms

flare.css

flare.css

26 ms

css

css

31 ms

player.min.js

player.min.js

27 ms

jquery.js

jquery.js

26 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

26 ms

third-party.js

third-party.js

26 ms

modernizr.js

modernizr.js

25 ms

jquery.flexslider.min.js

jquery.flexslider.min.js

26 ms

general.js

general.js

26 ms

shortcodes.css

shortcodes.css

27 ms

custom.css

custom.css

26 ms

tracking.js

tracking.js

60 ms

ga.js

ga.js

44 ms

optimizepress-2-vs-leadpages-review-bonus-blog.png

optimizepress-2-vs-leadpages-review-bonus-blog.png

240 ms

02f145416566ec34a2f79ba84d7d9574

02f145416566ec34a2f79ba84d7d9574

96 ms

d2483029c0d02f7467184cd373a93efa

d2483029c0d02f7467184cd373a93efa

95 ms

51b6f4121e58b652e9316f738d25afb6

51b6f4121e58b652e9316f738d25afb6

95 ms

optimize-press.jpg

optimize-press.jpg

772 ms

stripe-payment-optimizepress-2-100x100.png

stripe-payment-optimizepress-2-100x100.png

214 ms

increase-leads-630x315-100x100.jpg

increase-leads-630x315-100x100.jpg

214 ms

the-overlay-optimizer-op2-100x100.png

the-overlay-optimizer-op2-100x100.png

187 ms

optimizepress-2.0-logo-james-dyson-facebook--100x100.png

optimizepress-2.0-logo-james-dyson-facebook--100x100.png

185 ms

build-websites-with-optimizepress-100x100.png

build-websites-with-optimizepress-100x100.png

163 ms

facebook_logo_detail-100x100.gif

facebook_logo_detail-100x100.gif

342 ms

leadpages-review-100x100.jpeg

leadpages-review-100x100.jpeg

339 ms

free-landing-page-templates-100x100.png

free-landing-page-templates-100x100.png

369 ms

the-true-review-about-optimizepress-2.0.png

the-true-review-about-optimizepress-2.0.png

450 ms

conversation-rate.jpg

conversation-rate.jpg

379 ms

Fail.jpg

Fail.jpg

399 ms

optimizepress-2-vs-leadpages-review-bonus-blog-40x40.png

optimizepress-2-vs-leadpages-review-bonus-blog-40x40.png

494 ms

optimizepress-2.0-logo-james-dyson-facebook--40x40.png

optimizepress-2.0-logo-james-dyson-facebook--40x40.png

575 ms

stripe-payment-optimizepress-2-40x40.png

stripe-payment-optimizepress-2-40x40.png

579 ms

increase-leads-630x315-40x40.jpg

increase-leads-630x315-40x40.jpg

578 ms

the-overlay-optimizer-op2-40x40.png

the-overlay-optimizer-op2-40x40.png

582 ms

build-websites-with-optimizepress-40x40.png

build-websites-with-optimizepress-40x40.png

626 ms

61351286698afbca7cd15f49463590de

61351286698afbca7cd15f49463590de

120 ms

dce889ff416900f929d0fa521ad42ffb

dce889ff416900f929d0fa521ad42ffb

118 ms

plusone.js

plusone.js

117 ms

count.js

count.js

73 ms

wpBannerizeStyleDefault.css

wpBannerizeStyleDefault.css

474 ms

mediaelement-and-player.min.js

mediaelement-and-player.min.js

486 ms

wp-mediaelement.js

wp-mediaelement.js

493 ms

flare.dev.js

flare.dev.js

494 ms

wpBannerizeFrontend.min.js

wpBannerizeFrontend.min.js

495 ms

rss.png

rss.png

657 ms

02f145416566ec34a2f79ba84d7d9574

02f145416566ec34a2f79ba84d7d9574

137 ms

leadpages-review.jpeg

leadpages-review.jpeg

986 ms

__utm.gif

__utm.gif

13 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

668 ms

count-data.js

count-data.js

57 ms

count-data.js

count-data.js

63 ms

like.php

like.php

202 ms

cb=gapi.loaded_0

cb=gapi.loaded_0

22 ms

cb=gapi.loaded_1

cb=gapi.loaded_1

45 ms

fastbutton

fastbutton

230 ms

fastbutton

fastbutton

217 ms

postmessageRelay

postmessageRelay

43 ms

api.js

api.js

39 ms

core:rpc:shindig.random:shindig.sha1.js

core:rpc:shindig.random:shindig.sha1.js

89 ms

2536007149-postmessagerelay.js

2536007149-postmessagerelay.js

63 ms

vpc6VNjRPXV.js

vpc6VNjRPXV.js

276 ms

LVx-xkvaJ0b.png

LVx-xkvaJ0b.png

296 ms

rs=AGLTcCMjK4CJMIdNJ3yzirfRYfXhXxdyVw

rs=AGLTcCMjK4CJMIdNJ3yzirfRYfXhXxdyVw

14 ms

cb=gapi.loaded_0

cb=gapi.loaded_0

30 ms

cb=gapi.loaded_1

cb=gapi.loaded_1

25 ms

W5F8_SL0XFawnjxHGsZjJA.ttf

W5F8_SL0XFawnjxHGsZjJA.ttf

103 ms

Accessibility Review

optimizepresspro.com accessibility score

85

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

optimizepresspro.com best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools

SEO Factors

optimizepresspro.com SEO score

89

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Optimizepresspro.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Optimizepresspro.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

optimizepresspro.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Optimizepresspro. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: