Tools & Wizards About Us
optionsmile.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 17

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    32% of other websites

  • 67

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 32% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 98

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    92% of websites

optionsmile.com

OptionSmile | Finding the Options Fair Value and Market Mispricing

Page Load Speed

4.8 sec in total

First Response

247 ms

Resources Loaded

3.8 sec

Page Rendered

800 ms

optionsmile.com screenshot

About Website

Visit optionsmile.com now to see the best up-to-date Options Mile content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about optionsmile.com

OptionSmile is an analytical online platform for calculation of the options Fair Values based on the underlying security returns distribution observed in the past. It identifies market mispricing and ...

Visit optionsmile.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Optionsmile.com page load time and found that the first response time was 247 ms and then it took 4.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

optionsmile.com performance score

17

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.5 s

15/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value22.8 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value11.3 s

5/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,640 ms

12/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.149

76/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value23.5 s

1/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

optionsmile.com

247 ms

www.optionsmile.com

867 ms

bootstrap.min.css

49 ms

style.css

239 ms

main%20v10.css

353 ms

Our browser made a total of 75 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 59% of them (44 requests) were addressed to the original Optionsmile.com, 7% (5 requests) were made to Youtube.com and 4% (3 requests) were made to Static.addtoany.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2 sec) belongs to the original domain Optionsmile.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 2.2 MB (69%)

Content Size

3.2 MB

After Optimization

993.1 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Optionsmile.com main page is 3.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 2.6 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-85%

Potential reduce by 75.9 kB

  • Original 89.3 kB
  • After minification 54.6 kB
  • After compression 13.4 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 34.6 kB, which is 39% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 75.9 kB or 85% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 2.2 MB

  • Original 2.6 MB
  • After minification 470.0 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Options Mile needs image optimization as it can save up to 2.2 MB or 82% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 8.6 kB

  • Original 446.6 kB
  • After minification 446.6 kB
  • After compression 438.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 1.7 kB

  • Original 73.5 kB
  • After minification 73.4 kB
  • After compression 71.8 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Optionsmile.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 40 (59%)

Requests Now

68

After Optimization

28

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 68 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Options Mile. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 30 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 12 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

optionsmile.com

optionsmile.com

247 ms

www.optionsmile.com

www.optionsmile.com

867 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

49 ms

style.css

style.css

239 ms

main%20v10.css

main%20v10.css

353 ms

grid%20v7.css

grid%20v7.css

359 ms

styles.css

styles.css

361 ms

foobox.free.min.css

foobox.free.min.css

361 ms

public.css

public.css

365 ms

addtoany.min.css

addtoany.min.css

378 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

47 ms

addtoany.min.js

addtoany.min.js

466 ms

foobox.free.min.js

foobox.free.min.js

485 ms

page.js

page.js

54 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

46 ms

common%20v4.js

common%20v4.js

477 ms

slick.js

slick.js

597 ms

jquery.cookie.min.js

jquery.cookie.min.js

485 ms

js

js

108 ms

api:client.js

api:client.js

43 ms

ajax-login-script.js

ajax-login-script.js

492 ms

social%20v3.js

social%20v3.js

577 ms

scripts.js

scripts.js

595 ms

page-scroll-to-id.min.js

page-scroll-to-id.min.js

600 ms

public-min.js

public-min.js

603 ms

wp-embed.min.js

wp-embed.min.js

611 ms

font.css

font.css

461 ms

slick.css

slick.css

482 ms

strat-table.css

strat-table.css

481 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

wp-emoji-release.min.js

269 ms

cb=gapi.loaded_0

cb=gapi.loaded_0

116 ms

CStSr1eAbno

CStSr1eAbno

245 ms

logo.png

logo.png

222 ms

dicecup-background.png

dicecup-background.png

1976 ms

front-pic1.png

front-pic1.png

1392 ms

front-pic2.png

front-pic2.png

1019 ms

slider-book.jpg

slider-book.jpg

241 ms

approach1.png

approach1.png

1253 ms

approach2.png

approach2.png

1261 ms

approach3.png

approach3.png

1052 ms

approach4.png

approach4.png

1255 ms

approach5_1.png

approach5_1.png

1630 ms

approach6.png

approach6.png

1393 ms

slider-logo200.png

slider-logo200.png

1390 ms

facebook.png

facebook.png

1391 ms

twitter.png

twitter.png

1489 ms

telegramm.png

telegramm.png

1493 ms

sm.25.html

sm.25.html

215 ms

eso.Ep5bSEmr.js

eso.Ep5bSEmr.js

230 ms

www.optionsmile.com

www.optionsmile.com

1723 ms

js

js

160 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

104 ms

HeliosCondC.otf

HeliosCondC.otf

1361 ms

HeliosCondC-Bold.otf

HeliosCondC-Bold.otf

1376 ms

cb=gapi.loaded_1

cb=gapi.loaded_1

26 ms

sdk.js

sdk.js

79 ms

arrow.png

arrow.png

1397 ms

foobox.woff

foobox.woff

1395 ms

www-player.css

www-player.css

32 ms

www-embed-player.js

www-embed-player.js

167 ms

base.js

base.js

247 ms

collect

collect

165 ms

iframe

iframe

718 ms

sdk.js

sdk.js

47 ms

collect

collect

589 ms

ad_status.js

ad_status.js

409 ms

6mt_jkCC8QEMfVv4UaXe0WVRezbgElH9_VSMBGBwk28.js

6mt_jkCC8QEMfVv4UaXe0WVRezbgElH9_VSMBGBwk28.js

304 ms

embed.js

embed.js

155 ms

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf

102 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf

110 ms

m=base

m=base

109 ms

Create

Create

149 ms

id

id

111 ms

iframerpc

iframerpc

131 ms

GenerateIT

GenerateIT

16 ms

Accessibility Review

optionsmile.com accessibility score

67

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles

High

[aria-hidden="true"] elements contain focusable descendents

High

ARIA input fields do not have accessible names

High

Elements with an ARIA [role] that require children to contain a specific [role] are missing some or all of those required children.

High

[aria-*] attributes do not have valid values

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

optionsmile.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

optionsmile.com SEO score

98

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Optionsmile.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Optionsmile.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

optionsmile.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Options Mile. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: